As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
SPUDMASHER wrote:Pancho is right that about why Haarland quit
He really isn't, Spud - Haaland would have had to quit anyway, but the day was brought forward by Keane's actions.
which leg did keane injure..which leg forced his retirement 17months later...
someone take that f++king shovel off him
Sorry Pancho, I've tried explaining it in simple terms, but you're clearly unable to comprehend anything but Fergiespeak - I'm out.
perhaps we should deal with FACTS...did keane end haarland career as you keep stating .. I think beyond any shaodw of doubt I have PROVED he didnt...you got a bit upset about references in a book..but the FACTS are
he played on in that game...career still going
he played for the remaining 10+ gmaes that season ..career going
he played the follwoing season ..career still going
he injures his LEFT LEG..the opposite to the RIGHT leg keane injured...
now perhpas I m missing something here but how can you have an explian to me your FACTUAL based argeuments .. then perhaps I can comprehend your point ..apart from the ABU urban myth
26may1989 wrote:
... you're clearly unable to comprehend anything but Fergiespeak ...
Maybe He IS Fergie...?
No, even Fergie can understand simple statements made in English. This muppet doesn't even seem to understand the word "prove", which he thinks means "repeatedly state something in the face of objective facts indicating the opposite is true".
26may1989 wrote:
... you're clearly unable to comprehend anything but Fergiespeak ...
Maybe He IS Fergie...?
No, even Fergie can understand simple statements made in English. This muppet doesn't even seem to understand the word "prove", which he thinks means "repeatedly state something in the face of objective facts indicating the opposite is true".
Ok I have one question for you ...prove the keane ended his career..just facts not conjecture..FACTS...upto now you have failed to give me ONE FACT..I gave you four that cannot be disputed...I ask you for just ONE FACT
26may1989 wrote:
... you're clearly unable to comprehend anything but Fergiespeak ...
Maybe He IS Fergie...?
No, even Fergie can understand simple statements made in English. This muppet doesn't even seem to understand the word "prove", which he thinks means "repeatedly state something in the face of objective facts indicating the opposite is true".
And he can't post on a website, despite working in IT.
26may1989 wrote:
... you're clearly unable to comprehend anything but Fergiespeak ...
Maybe He IS Fergie...?
No, even Fergie can understand simple statements made in English. This muppet doesn't even seem to understand the word "prove", which he thinks means "repeatedly state something in the face of objective facts indicating the opposite is true".
And he can't post on a website, despite working in IT.
still waiting for this fact!!..youre not trying to squirm out of proving your statement are you?....
Pancho wrote:Ok I have one question for you ...prove the keane ended his career..just facts not conjecture..FACTS...upto now you have failed to give me ONE FACT..I gave you four that cannot be disputed...I ask you for just ONE FACT
Ok, I did say I was out, but I can't resist! Go back to my 3rd, 4th, 6th, 7th and 8th posts on this thread - it's all there - cause of damage to left-knee, pre-existing injury, Keane's intent, views of Haaland's doctors, Haaland's attempts to revive his career, strength of Haaland's legal case were it not for the pre-existing injury. These are all facts. If you have trouble reading, I can get my five-year old to help you.
As I said earlier, "Pancho, you don't know what you're talking about here. Best to shut up, rather than come back with bullshit developed by United fans to explain away what one of their heroes, on his own admission, did."