THE WENGER THREAD

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62236
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by DB10GOONER »

g88ner wrote:
Goonerpath wrote:Cannot believe we are about to be surpassed by Spurs, they are going to be a major force next season, they have bought Paulinho, Soldado and Capoue to add to an already very strong squad.
Never heard that before. :roll: :lol: Always next season. The doom mongers have being calling it for years... eventually they'll be right of course because Sp*rs are one of the best teams in England, but I think you should wait to see what happens to Bale and who we sign before you say we are about to be surpassed by a team that hasn't finished above us for nearly 20 years.
Goonerpath wrote: Arsenal on the other hand have spent £0.
Good thing the window hasn't closed then. Does anyone GENUINELY believe we won't spend anything before the window closes? honestly? - I think it's a certainty that we will.
Oh, he WILL spend, mate. But it will be £8million on the next Song/LegoHead/Forehead/Camel/Diaby/Mannone. And it will probably be a last day of the transfer window panic buy or two. :roll: :|

User avatar
flash gunner
Posts: 29243
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:55 am
Location: Armchairsville. FACT.

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by flash gunner »

Get rid ASAP your time has been and gone Wenger!!!!!!

User avatar
TeeCee
Posts: 10074
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:26 pm
Location: On the Cusp in SW France

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by TeeCee »

Oh, he WILL spend, mate. But it will be £8million on the next Song/LegoHead/Forehead/Camel/Diaby/Mannone. And it will probably be a last day of the transfer window panic buy or two. :roll: :|
You beat me to it DB,

Of course he will spend, last minute panic buys as he realises that our squad is piss poor and lacks strength. But we all know that any signings made late will be fairly weak, mediocre and probably French. No 'big' team is likely to sell a super quality player at the last second without being able to sign a replacement.......except most of the small French clubs of course and Wanger does like to boost the French football economy every window!!

Clash
Posts: 2991
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:46 pm

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by Clash »

Jonny_Gooner wrote:Oh dear, I made the mistake of commenting on an article somewhere, and have incurred the wrath of elitist Wenger supporters who do not dare hear anything said against their overlord and master.

The author of the article implied that those who do not support Wenger, can not call themselves true 'Gooners'. I said that this was a ridiculous attitude to have and that the author should be ashamed of writing in such a way. But then again, my measured approach was not to the liking of others. Sad really.

Makes me feel like :banghead:
I made the mistake of opening a link a mate sent me which was an article on Untold Arsenal written by Tony Attwood. It may even have been the same article you read. The article was saying we didn't need to sign players and that anyone who wanted big signings was just being dictated to by the media and couldn't think for themselves (oh the irony).

This Attwood guy tries so hard to portray himself as an intellectual who can think outside the box. He so badly wants to be seen as a cut above. But his article was full of childish references to the AAA (Anti-Arsenal Arsenal). He must have said AAA about a dozen times. How juvenile is that? There is no AAA but sometimes people need to create an enemy to feel like they are fighting for a cause.

Another thing about people like Attwood - they like to belittle the views of critics of Wenger by claiming they are only interested in trophies and cannot see the more important work Wenger has been doing. As though critics of Wenger cannot see the bigger picture. Yet it is because of the trophies Wenger has won that the likes of Attwood worship him in the first place - so spare me the holier than thou shite about trophies not being important you condescending pricks!

People list the trophies Wenger won to defend him and show how great he is - then when he wins nothing for 8 years, trophies are not important all of a sudden. Funny that!

(And yes, I know I shouldn't ever have read anything wriiten on Untold Arsenal ... )

User avatar
DB10GOONER
Posts: 62236
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Contact:

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by DB10GOONER »

Lads, we have had issues with Attwood before so let's not let this thread descend into abuse aimed at him, ok?

Clash
Posts: 2991
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:46 pm

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by Clash »

DB10GOONER wrote:Lads, we have had issues with Attwood before so let's not let this thread descend into abuse aimed at him, ok?
Apologies DB10 - that must have been before my time on here as I didn't know about that.

User avatar
Ryanswannell
Posts: 423
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 6:47 pm
Location: Treatment Table

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by Ryanswannell »

Just nicked this image from goonersworld.com

A hint to wengers last day bargain hunt :lol: :lol:


Image

User avatar
highburyJD
Posts: 4982
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:36 pm
Location: Highbury

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by highburyJD »

Wenger said his biggest regret was not signing Eto'o (and a few Chelski players, Drogs and Cech I think)
hope he can make up for that and sign Eto'o. He's a proper winner.
Won consecutive trebles!

User avatar
northbank123
Posts: 12436
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
Location: Newcastle

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by northbank123 »

I wonder if Wenger's position on "financial doping" etc and consequent reticence to spend now would have become so entrenched had it been United that romped to the title in 2005 and 2006 and not Chelsea?

User avatar
TeeCee
Posts: 10074
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:26 pm
Location: On the Cusp in SW France

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by TeeCee »

Wenger said his biggest regret was not signing Eto'o
Along with another 1000 blatant lies in the past couple of years or so!! Can't believe a single word the liar says. :banghead:

User avatar
Natural Born Gooner
Posts: 3388
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:06 pm
Location: Taking aim, ready to FIRE!

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by Natural Born Gooner »

Clash wrote:
Jonny_Gooner wrote:Oh dear, I made the mistake of commenting on an article somewhere, and have incurred the wrath of elitist Wenger supporters who do not dare hear anything said against their overlord and master.

The author of the article implied that those who do not support Wenger, can not call themselves true 'Gooners'. I said that this was a ridiculous attitude to have and that the author should be ashamed of writing in such a way. But then again, my measured approach was not to the liking of others. Sad really.

Makes me feel like :banghead:
I made the mistake of opening a link a mate sent me which was an article on Untold Arsenal written by Tony Attwood. It may even have been the same article you read. The article was saying we didn't need to sign players and that anyone who wanted big signings was just being dictated to by the media and couldn't think for themselves (oh the irony).

This Attwood guy tries so hard to portray himself as an intellectual who can think outside the box. He so badly wants to be seen as a cut above. But his article was full of childish references to the AAA (Anti-Arsenal Arsenal). He must have said AAA about a dozen times. How juvenile is that? There is no AAA but sometimes people need to create an enemy to feel like they are fighting for a cause.

Another thing about people like Attwood - they like to belittle the views of critics of Wenger by claiming they are only interested in trophies and cannot see the more important work Wenger has been doing. As though critics of Wenger cannot see the bigger picture. Yet it is because of the trophies Wenger has won that the likes of Attwood worship him in the first place - so spare me the holier than thou shite about trophies not being important you condescending pricks!

People list the trophies Wenger won to defend him and show how great he is - then when he wins nothing for 8 years, trophies are not important all of a sudden. Funny that!

(And yes, I know I shouldn't ever have read anything wriiten on Untold Arsenal ... )
Had never been on that site before, and after seeing your post thought I'd take a look. Fuck me, a little bit of me died while reading both the posts and comments sections :oops: .

Arsenal has officially been taken over by the loons, and Wenger & FFP will lead us all to salvation.

Image
:barscarf: :barscarf:

User avatar
franksav63
Posts: 14520
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:07 pm
Location: Home - Whitechapel - Arsenal Block 6 - Twitter - @franksav63
Contact:

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by franksav63 »

Natural Born Gooner wrote:
Clash wrote:
Jonny_Gooner wrote:Oh dear, I made the mistake of commenting on an article somewhere, and have incurred the wrath of elitist Wenger supporters who do not dare hear anything said against their overlord and master.

The author of the article implied that those who do not support Wenger, can not call themselves true 'Gooners'. I said that this was a ridiculous attitude to have and that the author should be ashamed of writing in such a way. But then again, my measured approach was not to the liking of others. Sad really.

Makes me feel like :banghead:
I made the mistake of opening a link a mate sent me which was an article on Untold Arsenal written by Tony Attwood. It may even have been the same article you read. The article was saying we didn't need to sign players and that anyone who wanted big signings was just being dictated to by the media and couldn't think for themselves (oh the irony).

This Attwood guy tries so hard to portray himself as an intellectual who can think outside the box. He so badly wants to be seen as a cut above. But his article was full of childish references to the AAA (Anti-Arsenal Arsenal). He must have said AAA about a dozen times. How juvenile is that? There is no AAA but sometimes people need to create an enemy to feel like they are fighting for a cause.

Another thing about people like Attwood - they like to belittle the views of critics of Wenger by claiming they are only interested in trophies and cannot see the more important work Wenger has been doing. As though critics of Wenger cannot see the bigger picture. Yet it is because of the trophies Wenger has won that the likes of Attwood worship him in the first place - so spare me the holier than thou shite about trophies not being important you condescending pricks!

People list the trophies Wenger won to defend him and show how great he is - then when he wins nothing for 8 years, trophies are not important all of a sudden. Funny that!

(And yes, I know I shouldn't ever have read anything wriiten on Untold Arsenal ... )
Had never been on that site before, and after seeing your post thought I'd take a look. Fuck me, a little bit of me died while reading both the posts and comments sections :oops: .

Arsenal has officially been taken over by the loons, and Wenger & FFP will lead us all to salvation.

Image
:barscarf: :barscarf:
Why shouldn't Attwood be criticised? If it's not abusive but criticisim I can't see what the problem really is..!!! :roll: :roll:

User avatar
g88ner
Posts: 14693
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:17 pm

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by g88ner »

franksav63 wrote: Why shouldn't Attwood be criticised? If it's not abusive but criticisim I can't see what the problem really is..!!! :roll: :roll:
Who said he shouldn't?! :shock: :?

User avatar
franksav63
Posts: 14520
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:07 pm
Location: Home - Whitechapel - Arsenal Block 6 - Twitter - @franksav63
Contact:

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by franksav63 »

g88ner wrote:
franksav63 wrote: Why shouldn't Attwood be criticised? If it's not abusive but criticisim I can't see what the problem really is..!!! :roll: :roll:
Who said he shouldn't?! :shock: :?
Well DB10 aluded to it above... I can't see anything wrong with what the poster said... I'll re-read again... :? :?

User avatar
franksav63
Posts: 14520
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:07 pm
Location: Home - Whitechapel - Arsenal Block 6 - Twitter - @franksav63
Contact:

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by franksav63 »

franksav63 wrote:
g88ner wrote:
franksav63 wrote: Why shouldn't Attwood be criticised? If it's not abusive but criticisim I can't see what the problem really is..!!! :roll: :roll:
Who said he shouldn't?! :shock: :?
Well DB10 aluded to it above... I can't see anything wrong with what the poster said... I'll re-read again... :? :?
I have and Clash doesn't imo... !!!

Post Reply