I agree with last paragraph though I am not so high on Gary Cahill myself but agree all those players just aren't up to it. I could keep Diaby if I had more all-around quality in the squad and maybe Eboue for his versatility but that is it at most.QuartzGooner wrote:The budget exists to strengthen the squad.USMartin wrote:And you think the selection of thos players has nothing to do with mooney made available not simply to sign new players but to pay and keep the players already here?
We could have new players on same wages who would enhance the squad.
It is up to Wenger.
Before we even think about a big money striker signing that could be made from profits, how about keeping wage costs the same and replacing?
Bendtner with Piquionne
Arshavin with Marin
Denilson with Annan
Sell off Vela, Squillachi, Diaby, Rosicky, Traore, Watt, Randall, Eboue and we could use the £13M or so raised in transfer fees plus money saved in wages to buy Gary Cahill too.
Besides we are selling Cesc so why worry about all that. We should get 30-40 million for him alone so we should have if we follow your suggestion up to 55 million available plus whatever is already available to the manager now.
As to your comparisons, maybe valid maybe not. But the only really valid one would be the most debatable which is Arshavin/Marin and the reason it would be valid is that you have to look at both wages and transfer fee.
In the other cases we paid far lower transfer fees and now are overpaying them based on their performance.
Thge thing about all this is if they do not restructure the wages properly it doesn't matter who is available - if we are unable to match their wages or the wages on offer from other suitors we will not sign the players we could, no matter what we are able or willing to pay to buy them from their clubs.
Why do you think we have so few Bosmans since we bought Sol Campbell? The answer is simple - we do not want to pay the wages needed to sign those players or else we will have to pay higher wages at the top end of the scale which costs more money and also means we might be abale to signtraditional transfers on those wages which costs even more money then.
As long as we won't pay top wages we can get away with not spending big and still deny we don't want to spend more. It's a con and a calculated one on the supporters. If that is wrong show me all those those bigger-wage players we signed since 2006.
In fact I would say we overpay these players to make the wage bill look bigger so the false claim that we pay our best players as much as everyone else or at least as much as we should can be made. Again show me the proof I am wrong.
Oh that's right there is no need for proof of that because the Board is right no matter what.