

What part of "He has never done a leveraged buyout" do you not understand?Rugby Gooner wrote:The time has come for us to stand up and be counted! We owe it to the people who have supported this club for the past 125 years to act as checks and balances to this guys financial slights of hand.We must not allow him to buy OUR club by borrowing against it!!!USMartin wrote:That is the key to this. It certainly makes a lie of the claims that we didn't want his sort at Arsenal.Mr FINSBURY PARK GOONER wrote:Please also remember that Stan Kroenke could not afford to pay £50m he owed former share holders (whos shares he purchesed) just over a year ago. so how the hell is going to finance £500m to buy The Arsenal?
Sorry I was out earlier watching my niece's band concert...Henry Norris 1913 wrote:Hill Wood or Kroenke? It ain't exactly an enticing choice......
USM could you enlighten me please? I promise to read your whole post- honest!![]()
This is one reason why SWLGooner!!!Mr FINSBURY PARK GOONER wrote:Please also remember that Stan Kroenke could not afford to pay £50m he owed former share holders (whos shares he purchesed) just over a year ago. so how the hell is going to finance £500m to buy The Arsenal?
No....but the question is does he now have the resources to buy the club without one? He just bought full ownership of the St Louis Rams last year, and holds full ownership of the Nuggets Avalnche and Rapids in Denver. It is a valid and responsible question to ask does he have the resources to buy Arsenal without a leveraged buyout at this point?1989 wrote:What part of "He has never done a leveraged buyout" do you not understand?Rugby Gooner wrote:The time has come for us to stand up and be counted! We owe it to the people who have supported this club for the past 125 years to act as checks and balances to this guys financial slights of hand.We must not allow him to buy OUR club by borrowing against it!!!USMartin wrote:That is the key to this. It certainly makes a lie of the claims that we didn't want his sort at Arsenal.Mr FINSBURY PARK GOONER wrote:Please also remember that Stan Kroenke could not afford to pay £50m he owed former share holders (whos shares he purchesed) just over a year ago. so how the hell is going to finance £500m to buy The Arsenal?
Read my reply to Rebel on the previous page.
Talk about negative for the sake of being negative.
Usmanov wouldn't sack Wenger, he's part of the "Arsene can do no wrong" brigade.Bergkamp-Genius wrote:I hope this isn't true...and if it is i hope Usmanov steps in and trumps his offer.
I don't see what Kroenke can offer us, this would be an out and out business venture for him so i can't see him doing anything different to those who currently run the club...
As for Usmanov that would be an exciting prospect he has the funds to take over the club and clear the debts and invest in playing staff, i would expect immediate big changes if he took over now, big changes for the better, with Kroenke i see business as usual..what is the point in that...
Not forced to sell in a legal sense. He does not have to sell. However he may want to sell if he genuinely had buying the club as his goal and Mr. Kroenke would not sell to him why would he want to sit on those shares making little or nothingEboue-Why? wrote:So is it possible for Kroenke to end up buying most of the shares and then him and Usmanov being the only 2 shareholders? In that scenario, would Usmanov be forced to sell at any stage?
I wasn't suggesting he would sack Wenger...but what he would do is expect more from him...I see no way he would tolerate him going with youth and bargain buys if he was winning f all..1989 wrote:Usmanov wouldn't sack Wenger, he's part of the "Arsene can do no wrong" brigade.Bergkamp-Genius wrote:I hope this isn't true...and if it is i hope Usmanov steps in and trumps his offer.
I don't see what Kroenke can offer us, this would be an out and out business venture for him so i can't see him doing anything different to those who currently run the club...
As for Usmanov that would be an exciting prospect he has the funds to take over the club and clear the debts and invest in playing staff, i would expect immediate big changes if he took over now, big changes for the better, with Kroenke i see business as usual..what is the point in that...