Posted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 11:31 am
I bet Jack was sat at home last night watching that crap saying im so glad that I wasnt a part of that piss poor excuse for a team.
LeftfootlegendGooner wrote:TBH i'd rather read us martins posts, it's all the usual anti-english guff but i should be used to it and not read it but ocassionally i do and disagree with all of it.....is that ok?????augie wrote:LeftfootlegendGooner wrote:augie wrote:Another good night at the office for pearce and his team![]()
![]()
![]()
I watched most of the game last night and tbh it was dire stuffAnybody just looking at the result and seeing engerland concede two late goals might think that they were unlucky but the reality was a different story as far as I am concerned although for me a draw would have been about right
Right I am gonna stick my head out and say this........as a footballer sturidge is shit. His control of the ball is fcuking woeful and I thought his awareness of the game around him was poor - at one stage he took 10 touches of the ball before passing it and he hadnt moved 5 yardsUnless it is hoofed long english players have no concept of moving the ball fast or perpetual motion from their players. Henderson again looked anything but a 20m player and to listen to tyler practically wanking himself about the scum player (naughton) at right full you would think he was cafu when in reality he was just another version of theo.......head down, run at pace and no fcuking brains
![]()
It was good to see pearce adopting the same age old policy of having a dig at the media in his post match comments - he had a go at their criticism over englands first two performances when the reality was that they were absolute garbage in both games
What does that mean ? If you are disagreeing then please feel free to say where you think I am wrong
I think you hit the nail on the head, augieaugie wrote:LeftfootlegendGooner wrote:TBH i'd rather read us martins posts, it's all the usual anti-english guff but i should be used to it and not read it but ocassionally i do and disagree with all of it.....is that ok?????augie wrote:LeftfootlegendGooner wrote:augie wrote:Another good night at the office for pearce and his team![]()
![]()
![]()
I watched most of the game last night and tbh it was dire stuffAnybody just looking at the result and seeing engerland concede two late goals might think that they were unlucky but the reality was a different story as far as I am concerned although for me a draw would have been about right
Right I am gonna stick my head out and say this........as a footballer sturidge is shit. His control of the ball is fcuking woeful and I thought his awareness of the game around him was poor - at one stage he took 10 touches of the ball before passing it and he hadnt moved 5 yardsUnless it is hoofed long english players have no concept of moving the ball fast or perpetual motion from their players. Henderson again looked anything but a 20m player and to listen to tyler practically wanking himself about the scum player (naughton) at right full you would think he was cafu when in reality he was just another version of theo.......head down, run at pace and no fcuking brains
![]()
It was good to see pearce adopting the same age old policy of having a dig at the media in his post match comments - he had a go at their criticism over englands first two performances when the reality was that they were absolute garbage in both games
What does that mean ? If you are disagreeing then please feel free to say where you think I am wrong
Not especially no - like many others on here I take the piss when england lose but all that is is just banter. I watched the games cos I am a footie fan and I like to see what young talent there is coming through in the game both inside england and across europe. During the tournament I would say that I had what you would call a pop at 3 engerland players (sturidge, wellbeck and naughton) who, in my opinion, were over-hyped and I also said twice that jordan henderson is over-priced at 20m........you tell me where that equals an anto english agenda
Not only that, but the original summary of the game was spot on. Sturridge was woeful. Henderson was subbed off early in the second half as he had no impact on the game whatsoever.marcengels wrote:I think you hit the nail on the head, augieaugie wrote:LeftfootlegendGooner wrote:TBH i'd rather read us martins posts, it's all the usual anti-english guff but i should be used to it and not read it but ocassionally i do and disagree with all of it.....is that ok?????augie wrote:LeftfootlegendGooner wrote:
What does that mean ? If you are disagreeing then please feel free to say where you think I am wrong
Not especially no - like many others on here I take the piss when england lose but all that is is just banter. I watched the games cos I am a footie fan and I like to see what young talent there is coming through in the game both inside england and across europe. During the tournament I would say that I had what you would call a pop at 3 engerland players (sturidge, wellbeck and naughton) who, in my opinion, were over-hyped and I also said twice that jordan henderson is over-priced at 20m........you tell me where that equals an anto english agenda
In addtion, to the above, I think Henderson being played in one midfield position rather than another midfield position, and not even as a winger, should not preclude him from showing general awareness, intelligence and vision.I Hate Hleb wrote:Having told my pal how impressed I'd been with him during the season (and especially against us) I have to say my mackem matey that Henderson was shockingly bad during this tournament. Now I know we can't make proper assessments based on a couple of England U21 games but bearing everything in mind, it looks like you've got the best end of this deal and that Steve Bruce has mugged off Liverpool big-time!!
Oh I agree mate, he was poor, didnt influence any of the games and, whilst not any worse than most of the others, he was shite. Like I say though, its hard for the lad when inexplicably played as a holding midfield player, he's a right sided midfielder so should have either been on ahead of cleverley, or at least pushed forward to link between midfield and attack. Playing him so badly out of position was always going to lead to him struggling to influence the games imoI Hate Hleb wrote:Having told my pal how impressed I'd been with him during the season (and especially against us) I have to say my mackem matey that Henderson was shockingly bad during this tournament. Now I know we can't make proper assessments based on a couple of England U21 games but bearing everything in mind, it looks like you've got the best end of this deal and that Steve Bruce has mugged off Liverpool big-time!!
to be fair, gullitt is a clueless bellend who got sacked for stupidly deciding to play an inexperienced striker up front for a derby game, leaving one of the best srtikers in the world on the bench before losing. He then went to fucking wherever he went to (some shit hole no one has ever heard of) and got sacked because instead of managing his team as he was paid to, he decided he was better off going out and getting fucked in nightclubs all day every day. The day anyone listens to anything that comes out of that useless pricks mouth is a sad day in world history- great footballer, but a fucking idiot.MEDINABOY wrote:don't give a flying f.... about international football.the biggest comp is the prem .england and the cl can all take a hike .gullit said it years ago,you got to make a choice.you can have full club grounds and a shit national team or half empty grounds and a good national side .do you really want the prem to become la liga or serie a and sleep for 90 mins?
That's open to debate.safcftm wrote: We could be producing much better players with actual technical ability whilst still maintaining an exciting and popular premier league