Weekend games 11/12th Jan

[northbank123]

How does Skertel get away with dragging the jersey off opponents every single fucking week?? The referees in this league are beyond ridicule at this stage

Much better defender but Carvalho used to do the same. The bloke didn't even try and head corners clear, instead he just grabbed a fistful of his runner's shirt.

[LeftfootlegendGooner]

Good game tbh 2-2, two good goals by the orcs

[augie]

Obviously I am on my own here but if a player has to duck out of the way of the ball, then how can he be deemed as not interfering as all seem to be suggesting ? If the guy is standing offside on the other side of the 6 yard box then clearly he wouldn't be interfering but the ball goes towards him to the point that it almost hits him then he cant really be classed as peripheral imo

Of course my stance might also be due to the fact that I like citeeh and I despise pardew (c*nt). I believe that had we a top quality striker then we could be real genuine challengers but because that aint gonna happen, I would much rather see citeeh win the league than the chavs or victims. In case I forget to mention, pardew is a despicable c*nt

[LeftfootlegendGooner]

Obviously I am on my own here but if a player has to duck out of the way of the ball, then how can he be deemed as not interfering as all seem to be suggesting ? If the guy is standing offside on the other side of the 6 yard box then clearly he wouldn't be interfering but the ball goes towards him to the point that it almost hits him then he cant really be classed as peripheral imo

Of course my stance might also be due to the fact that I like citeeh and I despise pardew (c*nt). I believe that had we a top quality striker then we could be real genuine challengers but because that aint gonna happen, I would much rather see citeeh win the league than the chavs or victims. In case I forget to mention, pardew is a despicable c*nt

Your wrong mate, ted sort him out

[rodders999]

You are 100% correct there Augie......you are on your own with that one

[northbank123]

Obviously I am on my own here but if a player has to duck out of the way of the ball, then how can he be deemed as not interfering as all seem to be suggesting ? If the guy is standing offside on the other side of the 6 yard box then clearly he wouldn't be interfering but the ball goes towards him to the point that it almost hits him then he cant really be classed as peripheral imo

Of course my stance might also be due to the fact that I like citeeh and I despise pardew (c*nt). I believe that had we a top quality striker then we could be real genuine challengers but because that aint gonna happen, I would much rather see citeeh win the league than the chavs or victims. In case I forget to mention, pardew is a despicable c*nt

Augie - for the Newcastle goal what difference would it have made if he hadn't have been there? None, the ball would have flown in before Hart could get a dive in, exactly as it did. That's why he wasn't interfering for me.

[dPmunky]

5' - Ryan Shawcross (OG)

He scores when he waaaaannts

[augie]

Obviously I am on my own here but if a player has to duck out of the way of the ball, then how can he be deemed as not interfering as all seem to be suggesting ? If the guy is standing offside on the other side of the 6 yard box then clearly he wouldn't be interfering but the ball goes towards him to the point that it almost hits him then he cant really be classed as peripheral imo

Of course my stance might also be due to the fact that I like citeeh and I despise pardew (c*nt). I believe that had we a top quality striker then we could be real genuine challengers but because that aint gonna happen, I would much rather see citeeh win the league than the chavs or victims. In case I forget to mention, pardew is a despicable c*nt

Augie - for the Newcastle goal what difference would it have made if he hadn't have been there? None, the ball would have flown in before Hart could get a dive in, exactly as it did. That's why he wasn't interfering for me.

So by that logic he could have stood in front of hart cos that shot was so good he was never gonna save it anyway ? If I'm the keeper I hesitate when that shot goes towards the striker cos I don't know if he will try to head/deflect it in or not - granted I wasn't gonna save it anyway but the strikers mere presence near that ball has to affect harts thought process surely

Anyway at the end of the day I don't really give a shit - if I'm wrong then I am wrong cos it isn't that important to me either way

[augie]

That is a disgraceful penalty decision for the victims

[father_ted]

Obviously I am on my own here but if a player has to duck out of the way of the ball, then how can he be deemed as not interfering as all seem to be suggesting ? If the guy is standing offside on the other side of the 6 yard box then clearly he wouldn't be interfering but the ball goes towards him to the point that it almost hits him then he cant really be classed as peripheral imo

Of course my stance might also be due to the fact that I like citeeh and I despise pardew (c*nt). I believe that had we a top quality striker then we could be real genuine challengers but because that aint gonna happen, I would much rather see citeeh win the league than the chavs or victims. In case I forget to mention, pardew is a despicable c*nt

Augie - for the Newcastle goal what difference would it have made if he hadn't have been there? None, the ball would have flown in before Hart could get a dive in, exactly as it did. That's why he wasn't interfering for me.

So by that logic he could have stood in front of hart cos that shot was so good he was never gonna save it anyway ? If I'm the keeper I hesitate when that shot goes towards the striker cos I don't know if he will try to head/deflect it in or not - granted I wasn't gonna save it anyway but the strikers mere presence near that ball has to affect harts thought process surely

Anyway at the end of the day I don't really give a shit - if I'm wrong then I am wrong cos it isn't that important to me either way

What a laughably bad attempt at a post. I hope someone ends this back and forth soon because it's worse than watching monkey's fling shit at each other in the zoo.

[northbank123]

Obviously I am on my own here but if a player has to duck out of the way of the ball, then how can he be deemed as not interfering as all seem to be suggesting ? If the guy is standing offside on the other side of the 6 yard box then clearly he wouldn't be interfering but the ball goes towards him to the point that it almost hits him then he cant really be classed as peripheral imo

Of course my stance might also be due to the fact that I like citeeh and I despise pardew (c*nt). I believe that had we a top quality striker then we could be real genuine challengers but because that aint gonna happen, I would much rather see citeeh win the league than the chavs or victims. In case I forget to mention, pardew is a despicable c*nt

Augie - for the Newcastle goal what difference would it have made if he hadn't have been there? None, the ball would have flown in before Hart could get a dive in, exactly as it did. That's why he wasn't interfering for me.

So by that logic he could have stood in front of hart cos that shot was so good he was never gonna save it anyway ? If I'm the keeper I hesitate when that shot goes towards the striker cos I don't know if he will try to head/deflect it in or not - granted I wasn't gonna save it anyway but the strikers mere presence near that ball has to affect harts thought process surely

Anyway at the end of the day I don't really give a shit - if I'm wrong then I am wrong cos it isn't that important to me either way

Not exactly - because then he'd have been interfering with Hart. The fact Hart had no chance wasn't the basis of my argument, I was merely pointing put that it was the reason Hart didn't dive (and not because he was put off by Gouffran being there).

In general terms though I do agree that it's extremely off-putting when an attacking player dives in or sticks out a leg and doesn't get anything on the ball, because it tends to make the keeper hesitate. Just don't think that was the case here, at all.

I do think that generally the 'interference' rule is interpreted too leniently towards the attacking side. It frustrates me when defenders push up to play a striker offside, a player plays the ball to the striker and he then dummies or leaves it for somebody else to run onto, because they never get given and I don't think that's particularly fair on the defending team.

[northbank123]

Victims win. Citeh win. Chavs win. United win. Scum win. Even the fucking Shammers won

Better take 3 fucking points tomorrow night!

[father_ted]

And it continues..... fuckin' 'ell

[arseofacrow]

Obviously I am on my own here but if a player has to duck out of the way of the ball, then how can he be deemed as not interfering as all seem to be suggesting ? If the guy is standing offside on the other side of the 6 yard box then clearly he wouldn't be interfering but the ball goes towards him to the point that it almost hits him then he cant really be classed as peripheral imo

Of course my stance might also be due to the fact that I like citeeh and I despise pardew (c*nt). I believe that had we a top quality striker then we could be real genuine challengers but because that aint gonna happen, I would much rather see citeeh win the league than the chavs or victims. In case I forget to mention, pardew is a despicable c*nt

Augie - for the Newcastle goal what difference would it have made if he hadn't have been there? None, the ball would have flown in before Hart could get a dive in, exactly as it did. That's why he wasn't interfering for me.

So by that logic he could have stood in front of hart cos that shot was so good he was never gonna save it anyway ? If I'm the keeper I hesitate when that shot goes towards the striker cos I don't know if he will try to head/deflect it in or not - granted I wasn't gonna save it anyway but the strikers mere presence near that ball has to affect harts thought process surely

Anyway at the end of the day I don't really give a shit - if I'm wrong then I am wrong cos it isn't that important to me either way

Not exactly - because then he'd have been interfering with Hart. The fact Hart had no chance wasn't the basis of my argument, I was merely pointing put that it was the reason Hart didn't dive (and not because he was put off by Gouffran being there).

In general terms though I do agree that it's extremely off-putting when an attacking player dives in or sticks out a leg and doesn't get anything on the ball, because it tends to make the keeper hesitate. Just don't think that was the case here, at all.

I do think that generally the 'interference' rule is interpreted too leniently towards the attacking side. It frustrates me when defenders push up to play a striker offside, a player plays the ball to the striker and he then dummies or leaves it for somebody else to run onto, because they never get given and I don't think that's particularly fair on the defending team.

they shouln't be pushing up then

[LeftfootlegendGooner]

Thought shitty looked vulnerable at the back and the black and whites had a perfectly good goal ruled out that would have changed the game, when they come to ours we will fuck them up