THE CHELSKI CONSPIRACY - FINAL THOUGHTS
- QuartzGooner
- Posts: 14474
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 pm
- Location: London
GOONARMY SAID
"what really happened was Chelsea threw the match to cover their tracks and put him off of this theory, so know one will suspect if they win it next year. it's a conspiracy inside a conspiracy, the good ol' serbian jew double bluff"
QUARTZGOONERSAYS
Goon..just what is your whole thing with Jews? You previously called Abramovich "AbramaJew", now you are at it again?
(I have no idea how Serbians fit into this).
Do you hate Jews?
"what really happened was Chelsea threw the match to cover their tracks and put him off of this theory, so know one will suspect if they win it next year. it's a conspiracy inside a conspiracy, the good ol' serbian jew double bluff"
QUARTZGOONERSAYS
Goon..just what is your whole thing with Jews? You previously called Abramovich "AbramaJew", now you are at it again?
(I have no idea how Serbians fit into this).
Do you hate Jews?
- flash gunner
- Posts: 29243
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:55 am
- Location: Armchairsville. FACT.
Well thats blown Rolys mad man conspiricy out of the water. There can be no easier way of fixing a match than by penalties, paid off players could sky a penalty 20 foot over the bar and no one would suspect foul play so if there was corruption involved Chavs would have won on pens last nght and gotten away scot free. Also as Roly has claimed Mr A. got the Chavs to the final by corrupt means surely if you were going to bribe players, officials etc (risking imprisonment if found out) to get you to the final you would make sure you paid that bit extra to get a win.
Anyway Roly the straight jacket awaits

Anyway Roly the straight jacket awaits


- flash gunner
- Posts: 29243
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:55 am
- Location: Armchairsville. FACT.
- I Hate Hleb
- Posts: 18632
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 3:36 pm
- Location: London
Don't think it mattered to Roly either way who the eventual winners were - apart from giving his conspiracy theory a little more legitimacy, in his mind anyway - as he apparently already made his wedge from the mere fact Chelsea got to the final.
So if I were you, I wouldn't be expecting any humble pie eating from Rolypoly (mrgnu, yes because he does love a pie
).

So if I were you, I wouldn't be expecting any humble pie eating from Rolypoly (mrgnu, yes because he does love a pie




- flash gunner
- Posts: 29243
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:55 am
- Location: Armchairsville. FACT.
goonarmy, not being offensive or anything, but can you please answer the above questions (both the "jews conspiracy" and the "do you hate jewish people" one)?QuartzGooner wrote:GOONARMY SAID
"what really happened was Chelsea threw the match to cover their tracks and put him off of this theory, so know one will suspect if they win it next year. it's a conspiracy inside a conspiracy, the good ol' serbian jew double bluff"
QUARTZGOONERSAYS
Goon..just what is your whole thing with Jews? You previously called Abramovich "AbramaJew", now you are at it again?
(I have no idea how Serbians fit into this).
Do you hate Jews?
- Cockerill's chin
- Posts: 1278
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 12:57 pm
- Location: Found the transfer fund... in Bendtner/Diaby/Denilson's pockets
Quartz and DanielD
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... uble+Bluff
It's a South Park remark to point out reverse psychology. How did you get jew hater from that?
On another thread, Quartz you accused Khalid's judgements of being clouded by his heritage. I think your accusation might have been similarly clouded.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... uble+Bluff
It's a South Park remark to point out reverse psychology. How did you get jew hater from that?
On another thread, Quartz you accused Khalid's judgements of being clouded by his heritage. I think your accusation might have been similarly clouded.
Mate, he called Chelsea's owner Abramajew. In my book that's racist. If someone would write nicknames like Didier Drogblack or something like that, would you protect him in the same way?
I didn't accused him on anything. Quarz asked a question and he didn't answer yet. I just gave him a chance to clarify what he meant.On another thread, Quartz you accused Khalid's judgements of being clouded by his heritage. I think your accusation might have been similarly clouded.
- Cockerill's chin
- Posts: 1278
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 12:57 pm
- Location: Found the transfer fund... in Bendtner/Diaby/Denilson's pockets
- Magic Merse
- Posts: 905
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 2:08 pm
- Location: Stanford-le-hope, home of the world famous Dougie from McFly
I just wanner say i am 100% anti racist but calling someone a Jew isn't a racist comment.DanielD wrote:Mate, he called Chelsea's owner Abramajew. In my book that's racist. If someone would write nicknames like Didier Drogblack or something like that, would you protect him in the same way?
I didn't accused him on anything. Quarz asked a question and he didn't answer yet. I just gave him a chance to clarify what he meant.On another thread, Quartz you accused Khalid's judgements of being clouded by his heritage. I think your accusation might have been similarly clouded.
Jew's are a race, it is a relgion. So saying i hate jew's is now worse than saying i hate christians.
Personally i hate all relgions and find it funny when people have a go at scientology beacuse it's based on a sci-fi book. Well, how many other relgions are based on books?