northbank123 wrote:markyp wrote:sadly he is never gonna be consistent enough to cut it in the premier league,against Norwich in the frist half all our attacking moves went through him only to break down at the crucial point,had we had a quality forward instead of a headless chicken norwich would have had a first half hiding and we could have all had our feet up in the second half,instead it was left to the cavalry and the footballing brain of Podloski and the pace of Wally and the ox to salvage the match,Klingon coud have still been there now and not got us a goal,he is best suited to the mediodcre french league,not the prem and definately no way not ever the Arsenal.

Stream was a bit dodgy in the first half but it almost invariably froze with Gervinho in possession in a dangerous area with plenty of options, only to skip 3 seconds with Norwich going forward and audible groans from the crowd.
The best players have fantastic vision and are aware of everything going on around them a second before anybody else but they are also able to make split-second decisions. At least two or three times every game he plays, Gervinho will be tentatively running at the defender(s) in a great position and will end up just sort of stopping or passing it straight at a defender because no blatantly obvious option has slapped him round the head. It's as if if his team-mates don't make it obvious what he has to do then he doesn't have a clue.
I have genuinely never seen an attacker with such little vision or creativity. Saying that, he could still be a semi-effective player if he was willing to be more direct and use his pace to run at full-backs - many of the regulars are embarrassing in the PL and just get the ball across into a dangerous area. Unfortunately it seems like he's forgotten how to do that, because whenever he gets the ball his first thought is to slow play down and allow the defence to organise and cover, thereby negating his one asset - pace.
Agreed 100%.
I know we’ve all discussed to death the best ways to use Giroud and Podolski and Arshavin (given that Wenger hasn’t a fucking clue on how to best use them

) but I also feel that Gervinho (whilst he is admittedly pretty shit) could be more effectively used by a more pragmatic manager. It’s obvious that Wenger is still insisting that everyone (from the keeper to the tea lady) play tippy tappy Barca-Lite. So I think as soon as Forehead gets running at an oppo FB he thinks “Oh hang the fuck on – I’ve got to stop and pass it 5 yards to someone!”.
Back in the day, old skool stylee, a player like him (see TONY DALY

) would have been told; “Son you got one thing in your game – pace. Push the ball 10 or 15 yards past the FB, put on the afterburner, get to the goal line, and whip in a cross for the big lad in the box.” Then said manager would have had said player practice whipping in hundreds of crosses every training session until he was expert at it. Wenger will NEVER do this, not even as a Plan B. It’s against his purist footballing beliefs.
So, for me, Forehead is shit, but like Giroud especially, we could get more out of him by playing to his obvious strengths rather than crowbarring him into a system that doesn’t suit him (or most of the rest of our players tbh).
Before augie intentionally misreads

what I just wrote, I’m not for a minute saying Forehead would suddenly become a great player, but I am saying he might become a better, more useful player. Might. Maybe.