




I Hate Hleb wrote:Nope - still no clearer!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Put down your Camberwell Carrot, or email ir to me, that may help.I Hate Hleb wrote:Nope - still no clearer!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Or a woman pregnant - thankfully!!Top Londoner wrote:One swallow doesn't make a summer...
Steve_I wrote:I Hate Hleb wrote:Nope - still no clearer!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
lolOk, final attempt.
We haven't got a suitable striker available, we play without anyone specifically in that role. better?
Oh, I get it now. So playing with 5 strikers thenSteve_I wrote:lolarmchair supporter wrote:W. T. F. kind of wierd shit is this? Ive read this like 4 times and still dont know wtf you're on about?Steve_I wrote:Nothing wrong with playing a 4 6, the 6 being a sort of 1 5 with the 5 being a sort of 4+1 where the 1 can be any of the 5, imo.
Had a couple here btw. to clarify, was really meaning play 6 of our midfielders if we lose Giroud. hence the 4-6
of the 6 we should include someone holding leaving 5 other free to do as they need. so really a 4-1-5, but with the false 9 the five would/could, at any given time, either remain a 5 or become a 4-1 as necessary with any of the 5 being able to 'fill that hole' as the mood and situation dictate. However, if there are 2 or more on the field capable of holding in front of the two centre halves then that 1 (in the 4-1-5 scenario within the 4-6) need not be so rigid making it a 2 with permission to move, but not simultaneously. this makes the formation a 4-6 with the 6 being a 1+5 where the 1 could be 1 of the 2 (or possibly more) capabable of that holding role. this would have to be worked with the 4+1 as mentioned in the first post ensuring that the 1 there was probable not one of the 2 (or more) able to play the 1 in the 1+5 bit.
I Hate Hleb wrote:Steve_I wrote:I Hate Hleb wrote:Nope - still no clearer!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
lolOk, final attempt.
We haven't got a suitable striker available, we play without anyone specifically in that role. better?
But, but, but.....aren't you forgetting about 'Super Nicky Bendtner'?![]()
![]()
![]()
exactlywibble wrote:Oh, I get it now. So playing with 5 strikers thenSteve_I wrote:lolarmchair supporter wrote:W. T. F. kind of wierd shit is this? Ive read this like 4 times and still dont know wtf you're on about?Steve_I wrote:Nothing wrong with playing a 4 6, the 6 being a sort of 1 5 with the 5 being a sort of 4+1 where the 1 can be any of the 5, imo.
Had a couple here btw. to clarify, was really meaning play 6 of our midfielders if we lose Giroud. hence the 4-6
of the 6 we should include someone holding leaving 5 other free to do as they need. so really a 4-1-5, but with the false 9 the five would/could, at any given time, either remain a 5 or become a 4-1 as necessary with any of the 5 being able to 'fill that hole' as the mood and situation dictate. However, if there are 2 or more on the field capable of holding in front of the two centre halves then that 1 (in the 4-1-5 scenario within the 4-6) need not be so rigid making it a 2 with permission to move, but not simultaneously. this makes the formation a 4-6 with the 6 being a 1+5 where the 1 could be 1 of the 2 (or possibly more) capabable of that holding role. this would have to be worked with the 4+1 as mentioned in the first post ensuring that the 1 there was probable not one of the 2 (or more) able to play the 1 in the 1+5 bit.
I Hate Hleb wrote:Nope - still no clearer!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Altenatively just roll a two skin regular green one and put some scuff in it then all of the above will make sense but impossible to acheive .DB10GOONER wrote:I Hate Hleb wrote:Nope - still no clearer!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Ok. Look at it this way, in words you’ll understand. You have regular Rizla+ and king size Rizla+. Instead of using 3 regular Rizla+ skins to roll your joint, you use a combination of king size and regular. Now, to combat the inherent thickness to filter issues, you mix some mid strength Red Leb with that baggy of potent-as-fuck Moroccan your cell mate Stabby Pete carried in up his ass. Capiche?
![]()
And yes before you go all Italian on us, I know it can also be spelled "capisce".![]()
Herd wrote:Altenatively just roll a two skin regular green one and put some scuff in it then all of the above will make sense but impossible to acheive .DB10GOONER wrote:I Hate Hleb wrote:Nope - still no clearer!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Ok. Look at it this way, in words you’ll understand. You have regular Rizla+ and king size Rizla+. Instead of using 3 regular Rizla+ skins to roll your joint, you use a combination of king size and regular. Now, to combat the inherent thickness to filter issues, you mix some mid strength Red Leb with that baggy of potent-as-fuck Moroccan your cell mate Stabby Pete carried in up his ass. Capiche?
![]()
And yes before you go all Italian on us, I know it can also be spelled "capisce".![]()
DB u are an old got ,I havent seen real red leb or even yellow from the wonderful baalbek valley for many many years ,was my alltime favourite and got me through Ummaguma to the Wall !