THE WENGER THREAD

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
User avatar
Henry Norris 1913
Posts: 8374
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:25 pm

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by Henry Norris 1913 »

father_ted wrote:
Chippy wrote:
kiwomya wrote:
MrT wrote: To get constantly ridiculed by babatunde of all people shows you are probably an absolute tosser.
:roll: Yeah it definitely means that. Keep posting, you sound like a really nice bloke.
No personal attacks Mr T. :evil:
Where is the ban threat for this like I received? Oh wait, he is anti Wenger so he gets more leeway :roll:
stop being a whiny bitch. get some nuts *throws snickers bar*
Top
User avatar
Chippy
Posts: 9480
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:09 pm
Location: A town called malice.

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by Chippy »

father_ted wrote:
Chippy wrote:
kiwomya wrote:
MrT wrote: To get constantly ridiculed by babatunde of all people shows you are probably an absolute tosser.
:roll: Yeah it definitely means that. Keep posting, you sound like a really nice bloke.
No personal attacks Mr T. :evil:
Where is the ban threat for this like I received? Oh wait, he is anti Wenger so he gets more leeway :roll:
This is his first warning, you've had about 4.
Top
father_ted
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 11:51 am

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by father_ted »

Chippy wrote:
father_ted wrote:
Chippy wrote:
kiwomya wrote:
MrT wrote: To get constantly ridiculed by babatunde of all people shows you are probably an absolute tosser.
:roll: Yeah it definitely means that. Keep posting, you sound like a really nice bloke.
No personal attacks Mr T. :evil:
Where is the ban threat for this like I received? Oh wait, he is anti Wenger so he gets more leeway :roll:
This is his first warning, you've had about 4.
As I said in another thread, other than when I had banter with Augie and called him a *word censored* none of my posts have actually involved a direct insult. If mine are worth 4 then his must be worth 10 in this thread alone. Ah but then he is anti-Wenger. It's all agenda driven here.
Top
User avatar
SteveO 35
Posts: 22142
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm
Location: Abou's fan club

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by SteveO 35 »

ONE ARSENE WENGER.........THERE'S ONLY ONE ARSENE WENGER

:barscarf: :barscarf: :barscarf:
Top
LDB
Posts: 6663
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:13 pm
Location: Having a cup of tea and waiting for all this to blow over

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by LDB »

Image
Top
father_ted
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 11:51 am

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by father_ted »

SteveO 35 wrote:ONE ARSENE WENGER.........THERE'S ONLY ONE ARSENE WENGER

:barscarf: :barscarf: :barscarf:

Careful, you will get a warning.
Top
User avatar
SteveO 35
Posts: 22142
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm
Location: Abou's fan club

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by SteveO 35 »

father_ted wrote:
SteveO 35 wrote:ONE ARSENE WENGER.........THERE'S ONLY ONE ARSENE WENGER

:barscarf: :barscarf: :barscarf:

Careful, you will get a warning.
The only warning I get is from Rodders that I may need to throw out all my burgers as There's Only One might not be staying.......but we know different don't we ?
Top
falkirk goon
Posts: 4847
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:33 am
Location: In a darkened room

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by falkirk goon »

Im still in Tenerife 8) Le bumholes still a furburger and im still against :barscarf:
Top
armchair
Posts: 4279
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:30 pm
Location: Wengerhell

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by armchair »

father_ted wrote:
SteveO 35 wrote:ONE ARSENE WENGER.........THERE'S ONLY ONE ARSENE WENGER

:barscarf: :barscarf: :barscarf:

Careful, you will get a warning.
Yea steveo...
How come you are now allowed to post that, and bbq posts?
Does this mean Im allowed to criticise Wenger again without being told to "just enjoy the moment and stop moaning"? :rubchin:

#flipflop
Top
User avatar
SteveO 35
Posts: 22142
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm
Location: Abou's fan club

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by SteveO 35 »

armchair supporter wrote:
father_ted wrote:
SteveO 35 wrote:ONE ARSENE WENGER.........THERE'S ONLY ONE ARSENE WENGER

:barscarf: :barscarf: :barscarf:

Careful, you will get a warning.
Yea steveo...
How come you are now allowed to post that, and bbq posts?
Does this mean Im allowed to criticise Wenger again without being told to "just enjoy the moment and stop moaning"? :rubchin:

#flipflop
You need to be careful what you wish for you ungrateful bastard ! Remember if we spend 30m of the 70m+ available free cash on a striker we'll end up like these

Image

Image
Top
mcdowell42
Posts: 18139
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:19 pm
Location: ireland

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by mcdowell42 »

Can anyone else hear a squeak,sounds like a rat ,better not say to much in case the rat goes squealing to a mod.
Top
User avatar
SteveO 35
Posts: 22142
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 7:01 pm
Location: Abou's fan club

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by SteveO 35 »

Someone's handed Rodders phone in by the way

Image
Top
armchair
Posts: 4279
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:30 pm
Location: Wengerhell

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by armchair »

kiwomya wrote:
Oh yeah I know some of the players were at the end but still we terminated the contracts of Chamakh, Denilson and wasn't Andre Santos also released? We also sold Gervinho.

We've added much needed "proven" talent over the last few years (Arteta, Mertesacker, Cazorla, Podolski, Flamini, Ozil etc etc) whereas in the past would have instead signed young players with potential.

We finally went out and signed a massive name in world football with Ozil. Would these things have happened in the years before? I personally don't see it.
I agree with everything you've said and you have highlighted some of the reasons that re-enforce my opinion why Wenger should have been sacked years ago.

How many points/trophys has he thrown away by failing to get rid of the shit? By rewarding them with lucrative, extended contracts? By not buying some "proven talent" and strengthing the squad year on year? By instead signing "young players with potential"?

So now he has supposedly turned his back on his "project" and failed "socialist wage policy" and signed Ozil, (although I dont believe Wenger signed Ozil. I believe he was a marquee signing to boost falling season tickets) Mert Arteta, Poldi. I wouldnt put Flamini in that bracket as he was a free that fell into his lap ffs.
Are we supposed to now #flipflop and laud him as a genuis again after begging him for years to do these things?

Are we supposed to call for a new bumper contract for him on the strength that "we are top of the league right now and might win something this time" Like so many keep saying every fukin year - judge him in May?

Been there. Done that. :(
Top
father_ted
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 11:51 am

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by father_ted »

mcdowell42 wrote:Can anyone else hear a squeak,sounds like a rat ,better not say to much in case the rat goes squealing to a mod.
Expand.....?
Top
mcdowell42
Posts: 18139
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:19 pm
Location: ireland

Re: WENGER - Views For and Against.

Post by mcdowell42 »

Does anyone have actual proof Ozil wasnt a wenger buy/ choice ,i know i have no proof to say if he was or not.Seems to be a stupid thing to claim when theres no proof to suggest he was or wasnt a wenger buy. :rubchin:
Top
Post Reply

Return to “On the Terraces”