Olivier Giroud - Another Alan Smith or "Le Chapman"?
- northbank123
- Posts: 12436
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Olivier Giroud aka Le Chapman
I think/hope I made it clear in earlier posts that I was dissecting his stats in response to the somewhat alarming number of people who put forward the point that his goalscoring stats are actually good for his first season in English football, which is offered up far more than any actual defence of his abilities and general contributions. Unfortunately it's all too easy to try and counter any criticism with "it's his first season in a new league etc etc".
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62104
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: Olivier Giroud aka Le Chapman
Yeah, I agree about the number of goals. He's done "ok" but not good enough for a club of our supposed aspirations. "OK" might be good enough at Stoke or Wigan but it should never be good enough for us, with the ticket prices we pay and the known wealth the club has generated and 2 billionaires owning stock...northbank123 wrote:I think/hope I made it clear in earlier posts that I was dissecting his stats in response to the somewhat alarming number of people who put forward the point that his goalscoring stats are actually good for his first season in English football, which is offered up far more than any actual defence of his abilities and general contributions. Unfortunately it's all too easy to try and counter any criticism with "it's his first season in a new league etc etc".

But then we are talking about a manager/Board that renewed and improved conntracts for shit like Song, Legohead, Bendtner, Vela, Mannone, Flappy, Almunia, Camel, Djourou and wasters like Diaby and Arshavings when they had done simply fuck all to deserve it. The money we spent on their wages alone would have signed at least 2 maybe 3 world class players and paid them handsomely too.
We encourage failure. Shocking state of affairs.


Re: Olivier Giroud aka Le Chapman
I just think in todays market we got what we paid for. That's by no means a defence as I agree Giroud's been pretty poor this season given the chances/appearances he's had.northbank123 wrote:I think/hope I made it clear in earlier posts that I was dissecting his stats in response to the somewhat alarming number of people who put forward the point that his goalscoring stats are actually good for his first season in English football, which is offered up far more than any actual defence of his abilities and general contributions. Unfortunately it's all too easy to try and counter any criticism with "it's his first season in a new league etc etc".
I said it before but the longer we purchase players in this price bracket the longer we'll be disappointed by the outcome.
- northbank123
- Posts: 12436
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Olivier Giroud aka Le Chapman
I agree with the overriding principle that if we're paying lemonade money we ain't going to get champagne players! Although £10m isn't that insignificant and I would still have hoped for better.kiwomya wrote:I just think in todays market we got what we paid for. That's by no means a defence as I agree Giroud's been pretty poor this season given the chances/appearances he's had.northbank123 wrote:I think/hope I made it clear in earlier posts that I was dissecting his stats in response to the somewhat alarming number of people who put forward the point that his goalscoring stats are actually good for his first season in English football, which is offered up far more than any actual defence of his abilities and general contributions. Unfortunately it's all too easy to try and counter any criticism with "it's his first season in a new league etc etc".
I said it before but the longer we purchase players in this price bracket the longer we'll be disappointed by the outcome.
- franksav63
- Posts: 14520
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:07 pm
- Location: Home - Whitechapel - Arsenal Block 6 - Twitter - @franksav63
- Contact:
Re: Olivier Giroud aka Le Chapman
10m isn't when compared to Michu... and didn't Wenger come out with some crap about him when he was available before going to Swansea? Something about he didn't like Michu's playing record at not staying at his previous teams very long?northbank123 wrote:I agree with the overriding principle that if we're paying lemonade money we ain't going to get champagne players! Although £10m isn't that insignificant and I would still have hoped for better.kiwomya wrote:I just think in todays market we got what we paid for. That's by no means a defence as I agree Giroud's been pretty poor this season given the chances/appearances he's had.northbank123 wrote:I think/hope I made it clear in earlier posts that I was dissecting his stats in response to the somewhat alarming number of people who put forward the point that his goalscoring stats are actually good for his first season in English football, which is offered up far more than any actual defence of his abilities and general contributions. Unfortunately it's all too easy to try and counter any criticism with "it's his first season in a new league etc etc".
I said it before but the longer we purchase players in this price bracket the longer we'll be disappointed by the outcome.

- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62104
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: Olivier Giroud aka Le Chapman
Michu has had a good season, agreed, Fwank. But I get the feeling with him that he's the new Le Tiss - the big fish in the small pond. There is no guarantee that he would have been a success at The Arsenal, same as there was no guarantee that Giroud would be. You take a punt. Sometimes you get Henry, sometimes you get Chamakh!franksav63 wrote:10m isn't when compared to Michu... and didn't Wenger come out with some crap about him when he was available before going to Swansea? Something about he didn't like Michu's playing record at not staying at his previous teams very long?northbank123 wrote:I agree with the overriding principle that if we're paying lemonade money we ain't going to get champagne players! Although £10m isn't that insignificant and I would still have hoped for better.kiwomya wrote:I just think in todays market we got what we paid for. That's by no means a defence as I agree Giroud's been pretty poor this season given the chances/appearances he's had.northbank123 wrote:I think/hope I made it clear in earlier posts that I was dissecting his stats in response to the somewhat alarming number of people who put forward the point that his goalscoring stats are actually good for his first season in English football, which is offered up far more than any actual defence of his abilities and general contributions. Unfortunately it's all too easy to try and counter any criticism with "it's his first season in a new league etc etc".
I said it before but the longer we purchase players in this price bracket the longer we'll be disappointed by the outcome.

- northbank123
- Posts: 12436
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Olivier Giroud aka Le Chapman
I think sometimes Michu is overused as a comparator - he can hardly be used as a benchmark £2m player, very much the exception rather than the norm.
Re: Olivier Giroud aka Le Chapman
Giroud is out for the season. Appeal denied so 4 games ban it is.
Re: Olivier Giroud aka Le Chapman
3 game ban stands. No further game added mate.p206ab wrote:Giroud is out for the season. Appeal denied so 4 games ban it is.
- Eboue-Why?
- Posts: 4216
- Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Sunny Surrey
- spendsum4uckingmoney
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 2:30 pm
Re: Olivier Giroud aka Le Chapman
I blame the scouts more than AW. It seems like our scouts just go for the easy target. What player is doing well in an average league, and who isn't attracting interest from big clubs we will sign.
If we don't finish in top 4 the whole club is to blame top down. Awful scouts, physios, players, coaches, board etc. Complete failure. Spurs are paying atleast 2/5ths less wages and are out performing us. We can no longer say we are a well run club.
If we don't finish in top 4 the whole club is to blame top down. Awful scouts, physios, players, coaches, board etc. Complete failure. Spurs are paying atleast 2/5ths less wages and are out performing us. We can no longer say we are a well run club.
Re: Olivier Giroud aka Le Chapman
How much did Villa pay for Benteke?
- spendsum4uckingmoney
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 2:30 pm
Re: Olivier Giroud aka Le Chapman
7mNumber 5 wrote:How much did Villa pay for Benteke?
- Perryashburtongroves
- Posts: 16049
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 6:18 pm
- Location: At the start of a glorious era.
Re: Olivier Giroud aka Le Chapman
spendsum4uckingmoney wrote:I blame the scouts more than AW. It seems like our scouts just go for the easy target. What player is doing well in an average league, and who isn't attracting interest from big clubs we will sign.
If we don't finish in top 4 the whole club is to blame top down. Awful scouts, physios, players, coaches, board etc. Complete failure. Spurs are paying atleast 2/5ths less wages and are out performing us. We can no longer say we are a well run club.
To be fair, I'd rather have a couple of Scouts or Girl Guides up front than Le Chapman and Gervinhodear.
- highburyJD
- Posts: 4982
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:36 pm
- Location: Highbury
Re: Olivier Giroud aka Le Chapman
wage bill is as meaningless in isolation as the net spend transfer table (since Abramothief arrival in '03 we're 20th)spendsum4uckingmoney wrote:Spurs are paying atleast 2/5ths less wages and are out performing us. We can no longer say we are a well run club.
http://transferleague.co.uk/
Wenger recognised wage bill correlates more to final league position than transfer spend
without our transfer market profits our wage bill of the last few years would have been unsustainable
Giroud, as Kiwomya points out, is a mid market player
all signings are a gamble, Giroud is a slightly longer shot but less money risked
he's had some poor poor games recently. I think he's had far too much responsibility foisted on him, that's the fault of the manager not the player. I still believe Giroud can be a good player for us.
Benteke was relatively cheap but Lambert bought a lot of players,
he spent £23M (Net) on a relegation battle