As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
franksav63 wrote:Actually, as I was reading your comment there, it made me think of the opening line to the song..... Love is all around....
... "I feel it in my toes"!
That'll be the 2nd photo. Kroenke with his shoe off lifting his foot up to his nose to catch another whiff of Lady Nina's creamy fish pie, and PHW thinking "By jove, what's that smell? Reminds of that time me & Arsene had that Indian bird on the floors of the Marble Halls. Good Times!"
I reckon Radford'll probably see the funny side of that. And that other bloke/gimp who types on his behalf.
Yeah I forgot he/they has/have selective grievences.
To be fair, I agreed with Radford on that one the other day. Not so much with how he went about it but on his/their original points. Or some of them at least.
I reckon Radford'll probably see the funny side of that. And that other bloke/gimp who types on his behalf.
Yeah I forgot he/they has/have selective grievences.
To be fair, I agreed with Radford on that one the other day. Not so much with how he went about it but on his/their original points. Or some of them at least.
This is it man, you don't appear to be a hypocrite though. Whilst making a valid point he let himself down by coming on the next day and going on about ****.
Who wants to go down Golders Green calling all Jewish people ****?
Being a pasty white catholic boy I have zero experience to call upon and even less real life experience of such situations.
Number 5 wrote:This is it man, you don't appear to be a hypocrite though. Whilst making a valid point he let himself down by coming on the next day and going on about y**s.
Who wants to go down Golders Green calling all Jewish people y**s?
Good point. Seriously would have liked to see his response to that one.
Number 5 wrote:Being a pasty white catholic boy I have zero experience to call upon and even less real life experience of such situations.
But I do think it's all or nothing.
See where you're coming from, I just take everything on a case by case basis though. You could have two instances of "racism" (as deemed by the same person), made by the same person, about the same race etc but I might see the humour in one & find the other just ignorant vitriolic shite. Plus sometimes I can be bothered & other times frankly I cant.
This has all gone a bit sensible. Who'd have thought Stanley's sticky finger sniffing on the sly would have led to that?
franksav63 wrote:Just a suggestion but have you (Number 5 - IU4GN) ever met? Because I think you two would make a great double act on stage (in a comedy sense that is)
Better comedy double than Radders? Nope, never met the big man. Dont know what makes me think he's a big man, mind! Just got this image of him being a giant!
franksav63 wrote:Just a suggestion but have you (Number 5 - IU4GN) ever met? Because I think you two would make a great double act on stage (in a comedy sense that is)
Better comedy double than Radders? Nope, never met the big man. Dont know what makes me think he's a big man, mind! Just got this image of him being a giant!
franksav63 wrote:Just a suggestion but have you (Number 5 - IU4GN) ever met? Because I think you two would make a great double act on stage (in a comedy sense that is)
Better comedy double than Radders? Nope, never met the big man. Dont know what makes me think he's a big man, mind! Just got this image of him being a giant!
Isn't Radders a trio.... ????
I'm not sure. He speaks in the third person. But in that case who is the third person? There's Radford, and the bloke that types his posts for him. But who's the other one? And what does he do?
franksav63 wrote:Just a suggestion but have you (Number 5 - IU4GN) ever met? Because I think you two would make a great double act on stage (in a comedy sense that is)
Better comedy double than Radders? Nope, never met the big man. Dont know what makes me think he's a big man, mind! Just got this image of him being a giant!
You guys fans of Kevin Smith? Clerks?
Cos I'd be up for a double act on stage, but only with me at the back end of the donkey.
RNTGOONER wrote:the thing that pisses me off is they wait till we (the fans )have paid a good chunk of the debt first, if he did it 3 years ago fair play, but if he buys the club by loaning cash and then secures it against our club he is stealing our cash, and i would want to ring his neck
Sorry mate but that doesn't make sense.
sense is overated
you must get what i mean to "re-morgage" the club after we have just got its debts down woud be a pisstake
Never saw Clerks. Might actually check it out based on your perverted sense of humour being about as decent a vouch for a comedy film as I can think of. It better not be shit now.
Its Up 4 Grabs Now wrote:Never saw Clerks. Might actually check it out based on your perverted sense of humour being about as decent a vouch for a comedy film as I can think of. It better not be shit now.
Oh it's good. Clerks 2 is good too.
Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back.
They have a cameo in Dogma.
Funny as fuck.
On a Stan Kroenke finger rating? 4 plus half a thumb.
Its Up 4 Grabs Now wrote:Never saw Clerks. Might actually check it out based on your perverted sense of humour being about as decent a vouch for a comedy film as I can think of. It better not be shit now.
Oh it's good. Clerks 2 is good too.
Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back.
They have a cameo in Dogma.
Funny as fuck.
On a Stan Kroenke finger rating? 4 plus half a thumb.
So basically it's not quite a classic but they made a decent fist of it. Gotcha.
