The Gooner's Online Message Board
https://forum.onlinegooner.com/
Amen, brother Gus.Gooner Gus wrote:aint got a clue. fuk it not really that bothered. dont take any offence.flash gunner wrote:Were you baptised in a Catholic church Gus? If you were youre Catholic if you were baptised in C of E church youre C of E but Catholics, Church of England, Baptist, Methodist etc etc etc are all Christian religions and deep down all the same
ill just stick to the one religion i know, 12:45 at my church this saturday
no no no, you miss read it. i ment then almighty ALLAH who we all love and praiseDB10GOONER wrote: You might get an IED for that one, mate!
Gooner Gus wrote:no no no, you miss read it. i ment then almighty ALLAH who we all love and praiseDB10GOONER wrote: You might get an IED for that one, mate!
forgive me
Chippy wrote:radford can tell you that princess anne was married there back in the 70'sREBEL GOONER wrote:Chippy wrote:Don't forget to sign up! Heading for a hundred people at the mo!Chippy wrote:For those of you on Facebook (sorry Percy), I have started a group called "No taxes for the Royal Wedding".
If you want to join go here
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=gro ... 5663136711
a royal wedding is good for the economy surely. all them tourists coming in and spending there euros to have a look at westminster cathedral etc ,
This is what the establishment are now putting out to try to justify the expense. Any tourists for the wedding will just crowd out the normal tourists and businessmen that are in London.
BTW Westminster Cathedral is the catholic one. If they get married there that will cause a stir!
There will be an element of crowding out, but I'd wager that you'd still end up quids in at the end of the day.Radford149 wrote:Chippy wrote:radford can tell you that princess anne was married there back in the 70'sREBEL GOONER wrote:Chippy wrote:Don't forget to sign up! Heading for a hundred people at the mo!Chippy wrote:For those of you on Facebook (sorry Percy), I have started a group called "No taxes for the Royal Wedding".
If you want to join go here
http://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=gro ... 5663136711
a royal wedding is good for the economy surely. all them tourists coming in and spending there euros to have a look at westminster cathedral etc ,
This is what the establishment are now putting out to try to justify the expense. Any tourists for the wedding will just crowd out the normal tourists and businessmen that are in London.
BTW Westminster Cathedral is the catholic one. If they get married there that will cause a stir!
Anne was married in the AbbeyChippy wrote:Radford is wrong.
Exactly. Give that man a tennis racket!flash gunner wrote:Anne was married in the AbbeyChippy wrote:Radford is wrong.
Chippy wrote:Exactly. Give that man a tennis racket!flash gunner wrote:Anne was married in the AbbeyChippy wrote:Radford is wrong.
Thanks another one to add to the collection 
http://www.republic.org.uk/What%20we%20 ... _date__dayLDB wrote:There will be an element of crowding out, but I'd wager that you'd still end up quids in at the end of the day.Radford149 wrote:Chippy wrote:radford can tell you that princess anne was married there back in the 70'sREBEL GOONER wrote:Chippy wrote: Don't forget to sign up! Heading for a hundred people at the mo!
a royal wedding is good for the economy surely. all them tourists coming in and spending there euros to have a look at westminster cathedral etc ,
This is what the establishment are now putting out to try to justify the expense. Any tourists for the wedding will just crowd out the normal tourists and businessmen that are in London.
BTW Westminster Cathedral is the catholic one. If they get married there that will cause a stir!
All this establishment lark gets on my tits, i was surrounded by it at uni, people who rally against anything and everything purely because they see it as the work of the 'elite' and will disbelieve any argument put to them purely on the grounds of who it is making the argument.
If we make a tidy profit from tourism and a few old housewives enjoy the spectacle of a royal wedding in the process then whats the problem?
We see no evidence that this event will generate any more revenue than a major football fixture - so subsidising the wedding would be no more tolerable than subsidising Wayne Rooney's salary."
Brilliant! I hadn't realised it was still on the chat page!goonersid wrote:Can we please have this in the basement, we are going to be sickened to fucking death of these 2 bastards, on the front pages of every bastard newspaper from now until they get hitched.
Then we will have the inevitible pregnancy, as another fucking royal mouth, for us all to feed is born into the world.
Then we will be sickened to bastard death when he starts shagging some ugly old aristocrat, and comparing her to a fucking tampon just like his c**t of a father.
Meanwhile she will be getting the arse fucked off her on a yacht by some big cocked arab.
The nation will be plunged into sadness when one or preferably both of the parasritic bastards are taken out by some secret military organisation.