Legends Statues

SWLGooner · Post by **SWLGooner** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 11:42 pm

Oops, ignore me

frankbutcher · Post by **frankbutcher** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 11:47 pm

SWLGooner wrote:Oops, ignore me

I already had.

Post by **HashKads** » Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:10 am

SWLGooner wrote:Oops, ignore me

Who doesn't?

*word censored*.

SWLGooner · Post by **SWLGooner** » Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:17 am

You, if you know what's good for you, shirt lifter...

frankbutcher · Post by **frankbutcher** » Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:18 am

SWLGooner wrote:You, if you know what's good for you, shirt lifter...

Tin hats on....

Red Member · Post by **Red Member** » Thu Dec 01, 2011 10:48 am

is it just me but what is the significance of 125 years?

I can understand 100 years, 150 years even but I have never known there to be a celebration for 125 years

what is actually quite funny is I can remember the 100 years anniversary and there was much less fuss than now

in those days players just got on with winning games. that was the perfect way to celebrate 100 years

Post by **HashKads** » Thu Dec 01, 2011 10:57 am

Red Member wrote:is it just me but what is the significance of 125 years?

I can understand 100 years, 150 years even but I have never known there to be a celebration for 125 years

what is actually quite funny is I can remember the 100 years anniversary and there was much less fuss than now

in those days players just got on with winning games. that was the perfect way to celebrate 100 years

You still here WUM?

Red Member · Post by **Red Member** » Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:03 am

Kingjayson I don't understand how my comment can be interpreted as being a WUM.

Please elaborate

donaldo · Post by **donaldo** » Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:09 am

Red Member wrote:is it just me but what is the significance of 125 years?
I can understand 100 years, 150 years even but I have never known there to be a celebration for 125 years

what is actually quite funny is I can remember the 100 years anniversary and there was much less fuss than now

in those days players just got on with winning games. that was the perfect way to celebrate 100 years

It gives the club another chance to bring out another kit.Remember we are a business not a football club.

Post by **HashKads** » Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:23 am

Red Member wrote:Kingjayson I don't understand how my comment can be interpreted as being a WUM.

Please elaborate

Who said anything about that comment? I am just asking are you still here Mr WUM?

:awnker:

Red Member · Post by **Red Member** » Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:44 am

kingjayson1 wrote:
Red Member wrote:Kingjayson I don't understand how my comment can be interpreted as being a WUM.

Please elaborate
Who said anything about that comment? I am just asking are you still here Mr WUM? :awnker:

I think if you are asking that then you are a bit thicker than I gave you credit for.

by calling yourself "King" you appear to have an over inflated opinion of yourself. I am not quite sure why.

Red Member · Post by **Red Member** » Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:47 am

donaldo wrote:
Red Member wrote:is it just me but what is the significance of 125 years?
I can understand 100 years, 150 years even but I have never known there to be a celebration for 125 years

what is actually quite funny is I can remember the 100 years anniversary and there was much less fuss than now

in those days players just got on with winning games. that was the perfect way to celebrate 100 years
It gives the club another chance to bring out another kit.Remember we are a business not a football club.

well more fool those idiots that buy it then.
I have never understood the obsesion with buying a shirt in the first place.
I never have and never will.

you wear the shirt if you play for the team. the job of supporters is to support the team

Henry Norris 1913 · Post by **Henry Norris 1913** » Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:50 am

Red Member wrote:
kingjayson1 wrote:
Red Member wrote:Kingjayson I don't understand how my comment can be interpreted as being a WUM.

Please elaborate
Who said anything about that comment? I am just asking are you still here Mr WUM? :awnker:
I think if you are asking that then you are a bit thicker than I gave you credit for.

by calling yourself "King" you appear to have an over inflated opinion of yourself. I am not quite sure why.

Ooooooh OUCH! are you saying KJ isn't the studmuffin he's been made out to be?

Post by **HashKads** » Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:13 pm

Henry Norris 1913 wrote:
Red Member wrote:
kingjayson1 wrote:
Red Member wrote:Kingjayson I don't understand how my comment can be interpreted as being a WUM.

Please elaborate
Who said anything about that comment? I am just asking are you still here Mr WUM? :awnker:
I think if you are asking that then you are a bit thicker than I gave you credit for.

by calling yourself "King" you appear to have an over inflated opinion of yourself. I am not quite sure why.
Ooooooh OUCH! are you saying KJ isn't the studmuffin he's been made out to be?

I will let my bf SWL be the judge of that not some scum WUM *word censored*

Red Member · Post by **Red Member** » Thu Dec 01, 2011 12:23 pm

kingjayson1 wrote:
Henry Norris 1913 wrote:
Red Member wrote:
kingjayson1 wrote:
Red Member wrote:Kingjayson I don't understand how my comment can be interpreted as being a WUM.

Please elaborate
Who said anything about that comment? I am just asking are you still here Mr WUM? :awnker:
I think if you are asking that then you are a bit thicker than I gave you credit for.

by calling yourself "King" you appear to have an over inflated opinion of yourself. I am not quite sure why.
Ooooooh OUCH! are you saying KJ isn't the studmuffin he's been made out to be?

I will let my bf SWL be the judge of that not some scum WUM c**t

he must be a bit desperate.
no doubt you both take what you can get though