DarylAFC wrote:Babatunde wrote:Can we please just clear something up here.
Olly Giroud was, is and always will be, shite.
"Once he finds the net"? LOL
Even Jeffers and Chamakh found the net now and then!
There's a reason this pillock gets booed on his second France appearance. There's a reason no other big team wanted him.
There's a reason he's got zero European club competition experience! At that age!

He's SHIT
Oh shut up, you really do my head in.
So he doesn't score in his first 3 games and he's shit? NO other top club wanted him, so he's shite.
So Bergkamp is shite then? He didnt score right away. He wasn't wanted by top teams.
How about Henry? Is he shite?
Chelsea wanted Giroud, by the way. He chose us because, in his words, "I wasnt sure they even knew me". Deny it all you want, but whose word am I going to take? The player himself who has no reason to lie or someone on a forum who was adamant that we were going for Kalou?
I am really sick and tired of this absolute drivel.
Oh bla bla 'Berkamp must be shite' since it took him ages to score bla bla.
Oh PLEASE. Invoking Bergkamp's great name to justofy this piece of turd is nonsense. For a start, Bergkamp was never an out and out striker whose job is to score goals alone.
Henry? Again, he was learning a new position and was younger than Giroud. Henry had also already proved he had it in his locker, when he was TOP SCORER FOR THE TEAM THAT WON THE WORLD CUP
Bergkamp was a massive signing, a club record, everyone knew who he was and Inter, a huge club, had taken a punt on him but it hadn't worked out. So please, don't abuse the usage of your two brain cells with such bilge.
'Chelsea wanted Giroud'
LMFAO. This has been proven to be categorical bollocks by the by, ROn Gourlay at Chelski laughed at the suggestion. Yes, I am really sure the club that lost Didier Drogba and were looking for the best were really after Giroud.
In which case I take it that Kevin Mirallas snubbed Arsenal for Everton then yes? Or will you choose to ignore that snippet
Giroud is someone I have watched play several several times. He is a target man. He isn't a playmaking number 10 with a deft touch who also scored the odd goal, as Bergkamp did. It shows what a baseless knowledge of football you truly possess, comparing a target man number 9 with a great number 10 and goalscoring
Giroud is the French Grant Holt. His job is to be a big lump up front and SCORE GOALS. The only person judging him on 3 games in the PL is you, and the Arsene lovers. I am judging him on the dozens of matches I saw him play at Tours, then at Montpellier. He might have top scored in Ligue 1 but then again, so did Guivarch, Kevin Gameiro, Gignac and Pierre-Alain Frau. All shite players.
Giroud is like Grant Holt (minus the ability to score a few in a big league). He's already performed like complete dog turd in the opening three PL games and missed absolute sitters in EVERY single game he's played. As if to reinforce that this is no accident, he then went to play with France and was torrid, missed his customary sitter and played like shite.
Only difference being, the France fans didn't come out with comical bollocks excuses like 'Oh Trezeguet never scored in his first debut game , does that mean he was shit bla bla'
Giroud is shite. I hope for his sake that he scores a couple of goals, and I'm sure you'll be smug after he's buried a hat-trick in the Carling Cup against Bury Town....
