Arteta.augie wrote:northbank123 wrote:DIRTY DIRTY PRICK. I'm embarrassed to say that he came through the ranks at our club because every time I watch him now he has nothing else to his game.
Could see straight away he went over the ball, disgusting tackle. Of course, he's English so it's a little bit clumsy etc and not in fact a potential leg/ankle-breaker.
No fucking excuses now AFC!!!
Who was the "assault" on ?
Fulham Away
Re: Fulham Away
Re: Fulham Away
arteta.
hilariously Fulham have come far closer to scoring than us since sidwell went off
hilariously Fulham have come far closer to scoring than us since sidwell went off
- northbank123
- Posts: 12436
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Fulham Away
It was on Arteta Augie. Just a ridiculous tackle,straight over the ball (and a bit late) but from a standing position so can't even try and use the excuse of momentum or whatever.
Really worrying how easily we were carved open by 10 men just because our striker lost the ball just then. Very early doors yet but we've created zero, disappointed (despite possession) that we've let them settle - Madrid at Old Trafford was a great example of being ruthless against 10 men.
Have a feeling Walcott will just decide to play essentially as a striker off the last man's shoulder now they're down to 10 - tbh wouldn't really be a bad thing, no point keeping negative 4-5-1 against 10.
Really worrying how easily we were carved open by 10 men just because our striker lost the ball just then. Very early doors yet but we've created zero, disappointed (despite possession) that we've let them settle - Madrid at Old Trafford was a great example of being ruthless against 10 men.
Have a feeling Walcott will just decide to play essentially as a striker off the last man's shoulder now they're down to 10 - tbh wouldn't really be a bad thing, no point keeping negative 4-5-1 against 10.
Re: Fulham Away
Agreed. Just had another good attack.nexum5me wrote:arteta.
hilariously Fulham have come far closer to scoring than us since sidwell went off
- northbank123
- Posts: 12436
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:05 am
- Location: Newcastle
Re: Fulham Away
Very novel approach they're taking to attacking - moving the ball with pace and running with purpose and direction. Well I never.
So far massive similarities between this game and Southampton away (and probably a fair few others!). They're just getting men behind the ball, defending narrowly and forcing us out wide and we're more than happy to let them dictate to us how to play. We're just being forced to either pass the ball across the midfield or go out wide, in which case our full-back will have one man to aim for in the box.
We need somebody who can beat a man. Unfortunately Wilshere and Podolski are the best at that and they're on the bench. Still, plenty of time
So far massive similarities between this game and Southampton away (and probably a fair few others!). They're just getting men behind the ball, defending narrowly and forcing us out wide and we're more than happy to let them dictate to us how to play. We're just being forced to either pass the ball across the midfield or go out wide, in which case our full-back will have one man to aim for in the box.
We need somebody who can beat a man. Unfortunately Wilshere and Podolski are the best at that and they're on the bench. Still, plenty of time

Last edited by northbank123 on Sat Apr 20, 2013 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:41 pm
- Location: Yorkshire
Re: Fulham Away
Just got back in for the game- hows it going lads?
Are we playing well or is it the side to side stuff?
Are we playing well or is it the side to side stuff?
- VoiceOfReason
- Posts: 879
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:48 pm
Re: Fulham Away
Is that allowed? I hope Wenger's complaining to the fourth official accordingly.northbank123 wrote:Very novel approach they're taking to attacking - moving the ball with pace and running with purpose and direction. Well I never.
-
- Posts: 6663
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:13 pm
- Location: Having a cup of tea and waiting for all this to blow over
Re: Fulham Away
This is unwatchable
Re: Fulham Away
it's bad isn't it? how the fuck are we making ten man Fulham look dangerous every single time they get the ball?!LDB wrote:This is unwatchable
and LOL at the commentaters suggesting wenger might make a tactical changes or even actually make a sub at half time!
Re: Fulham Away
if i had just turned this game on, i would think its us down to 10 men!!!!
shocking so far, bit of urgency and meaning to our play please!! why no Podolski again? would love to know whats going on there!
surely we can put a goal in against a 10 man team with Senderos at centre back???
shocking so far, bit of urgency and meaning to our play please!! why no Podolski again? would love to know whats going on there!
surely we can put a goal in against a 10 man team with Senderos at centre back???
- Ryanswannell
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 6:47 pm
- Location: Treatment Table
Re: Fulham Away
'bout
time!!!!!
Merty

Merty

Re: Fulham Away
2 CBs combine at a free kick to score?? holy shit!!!! lol







-
- Posts: 6663
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:13 pm
- Location: Having a cup of tea and waiting for all this to blow over
Re: Fulham Away
That's a relief but with the way we've been playing in this game the shrewd money will be on a fulham equaliser second half.
If we had a proper striker that doesn't just stand next to the centre half for 90 minutes and a right winger who hasn't been on the beach since becoming the highest paid player at the club then we could easily pick this lot apart.
If we had a proper striker that doesn't just stand next to the centre half for 90 minutes and a right winger who hasn't been on the beach since becoming the highest paid player at the club then we could easily pick this lot apart.
Re: Fulham Away
It can't be true because it is against the rules of Wengerball, but the move for the goal looked like it was worked out on the training field!
We are still looking horribly vulnerable.



We are still looking horribly vulnerable.