Re: "The window is almost open!" Transfer Rumour thread
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:06 pm
Well if ba goes to chelski leaves us open to get falcao


The Gooner's Online Message Board
https://forum.onlinegooner.com/
Love to mate, but if we didn't have it all in one place, the delusion that we might buy a decent player in the transfer window would spread like a plague to every thread.goonerus28 wrote:close this fuckin thread. Jesus!
Spot on, £7 million for Ba is a steal, not that the *word censored* Wenger would look at it that way, hed rather spend £11 million on shit like Gervinho, Ba is miles better than that *word censored* and Giroud put togetherTeeCee wrote:So the question remains.....who the fuck have Arsenal got to play up front if Giroud isn't fit? Wally yes, but will he stay?
For everyone who says 'No' to signing Ba............I'll fooking remind you of that when the senile muppet in charge plays Gervinho up front again!!![]()
![]()
Ba is a no brainer at 7m, he's been more reliable injury wise than at least half of the Arsenal squad so how can people question his injury potential??
9 goals and 11 assists in his first 6 months at the arsenal is Giroud that shit?GoonerN5 wrote:Spot on, £7 million for Ba is a steal, not that the *word censored* Wenger would look at it that way, hed rather spend £11 million on shit like Gervinho, Ba is miles better than that *word censored* and Giroud put togetherTeeCee wrote:So the question remains.....who the fuck have Arsenal got to play up front if Giroud isn't fit? Wally yes, but will he stay?
For everyone who says 'No' to signing Ba............I'll fooking remind you of that when the senile muppet in charge plays Gervinho up front again!!![]()
![]()
Ba is a no brainer at 7m, he's been more reliable injury wise than at least half of the Arsenal squad so how can people question his injury potential??
Why does the walcott contract matter we need another forward no matter whatQuartzGooner wrote:I would be happy with Ba but two uncertainties over him -
He has dodgy knees.
He might stir things up a bit, looks as if his departure from Newcastle is a bit acrimonious?
Anyway if Chelsea are involved, then as others have pointed out Chelsea will trump us with wages so we are not going to get him.
Llorente or Lopez or even Remy might come in the summer?
Much depends on Walcott's contract.
swimmer1 wrote:
Why does the walcott contract matter we need another forward no matter what
But only 6 goals and 1 assist were in the league so far.swimmer1 wrote:9 goals and 11 assists in his first 6 months at the arsenal is Giroud that shit?GoonerN5 wrote:Spot on, £7 million for Ba is a steal, not that the *word censored* Wenger would look at it that way, hed rather spend £11 million on shit like Gervinho, Ba is miles better than that *word censored* and Giroud put togetherTeeCee wrote:So the question remains.....who the fuck have Arsenal got to play up front if Giroud isn't fit? Wally yes, but will he stay?
For everyone who says 'No' to signing Ba............I'll fooking remind you of that when the senile muppet in charge plays Gervinho up front again!!![]()
![]()
Ba is a no brainer at 7m, he's been more reliable injury wise than at least half of the Arsenal squad so how can people question his injury potential??
Agreed. And also as far as January goes, unless Walcott suddenly signs in the next week or 2, or states outright he's going, I can imagine Wenger dilly-dallying over whether to buy a striker for fear of it tipping Walcott's decision in favour of leaving in the summer. Indecisiveness is Wenger's forte.QuartzGooner wrote:swimmer1 wrote:
Why does the walcott contract matter we need another forward no matter what
I agree we need a new striker even if Walcott stays.
His contract matters because I think it might effect both our transfer/wage budget, and what type of striker we buy.
If he goes, then Lopez could well be a favourite as he is able to play wide right or up front, if Walcott stays then Wenger may favour a taller more traditional target man in the mould of Llorente.