The Gooner Forum

can you just delete every topic that has anything to do with today and stop locking and unlocking threads to reply with a witty comment and close them again? :S

Not that im bothered with what i posted and not really sorry for its content but i am just getting a headache reading all of radford's posts in third person.

So just decide, make it all disappear or keep it all open for discussion but don't let some threads stay open and some locked and others deleted because people who don't know what happened just ask questions and then it starts over again meaning it is just a stupid circle of events.

Captain Fabregas wrote:Not that im bothered with what i posted and not really sorry for its content but i am just getting a headache reading all of radford's posts in third person

Tell me about it

The guy should get an ultimatum, you either speak like a normal person or you're getting banned

Captain Fabregas wrote:can you just delete every topic that has anything to do with today and stop locking and unlocking threads to reply with a witty comment and close them again? :S

Not that im bothered with what i posted and not really sorry for its content but i am just getting a headache reading all of radford's posts in third person.

So just decide, make it all disappear or keep it all open for discussion but don't let some threads stay open and some locked and others deleted because people who don't know what happened just ask questions and then it starts over again meaning it is just a stupid circle of events.

Hey fucker, why start another thread?

Captain Fabregas wrote:can you just delete every topic that has anything to do with today and stop locking and unlocking threads to reply with a witty comment and close them again? :S

Not that im bothered with what i posted and not really sorry for its content but i am just getting a headache reading all of radford's posts in third person.

So just decide, make it all disappear or keep it all open for discussion but don't let some threads stay open and some locked and others deleted because people who don't know what happened just ask questions and then it starts over again meaning it is just a stupid circle of events.

Radford can tell you the the people involved had actually closed the matter, it was the mods who kept stirring the flames.

Radford is cool with the posters but is very unhappy with the mods.

khalid_red wrote:

Captain Fabregas wrote:Not that im bothered with what i posted and not really sorry for its content but i am just getting a headache reading all of radford's posts in third person

Tell me about it

The guy should get an ultimatum, you either speak like a normal person or you're getting banned

Radford is not surprised with that type of nazi attitude

Captain Fabregas wrote:because people who don't know what happened just ask questions and then it starts over again meaning it is just a stupid circle of events.

Stop talking in code and just tell us all what the fuck happened?! (not aimed at you, CF )

Deleting threads pisses g88ner off... if people are willing to write a post, then they should stand by it and stop being so gutless as to ask for it to be removed.

Now that Calo has fucked off, we're all adullts so no need to delete threads. If a photo isn't within the rules, then delete the photo... of a post is against forum rules, then delete the post.... not the thread.

Anyway, reading between the lines.... it's something to do with paedo's, racists, Radford, ds and ****. So, without any evidence (after it was deleted) I'll assume one of the latter is one of the former. And that's that.

g88ner wrote:

Captain Fabregas wrote:because people who don't know what happened just ask questions and then it starts over again meaning it is just a stupid circle of events.

Stop talking in code and just tell us all what the fuck happened?!

Deleting threads pisses g88ner off... if people are willing to write a post, then they should stand by it and stop being so gutless as to ask for it to be removed.

Now that Calo has fucked off, we're all adullts so no need to delete threads. If a photo isn't within the rules, then delete the photo... of a post is against forum rules, then delete the post.... not the thread.

Anyway, reading between the lines.... it's something to do with paedo's, racists, Radford, ds and ****. So, without any evidence (after it was deleted) I'll assume one of the latter is one of the former. And that's that.

radford suggest that you ask the mods

Radford149 wrote:
radford suggest that you ask the mods

shouldn't MODS be MOD, as Spuddy deleted the thread, not Rebel, DB10, etc, didn't he?

Don't tar them all with the same brush

(no offence Spuddy! )

sounds to me Radders took offence to a black fella being abused with big lips and big eyes - i think

g88ner wrote:

Radford149 wrote:
radford suggest that you ask the mods

shouldn't MODS be MOD, as Spuddy deleted the thread, not Rebel, DB10, etc, didn't he?

Don't tar them all with the same brush

(no offence Spuddy! )

radford accepts the point. but today efforts by the mod/s was poor.

and on a forum that prides it's self of being very open, it was sad to see and read

Chunky Monkey wrote:sounds to me Radders took offence to a black fella being abused with big lips and big eyes - i think

radford still says that as you have no idea how the hell can you comment

- I posted a topic showing everyone the new Arsenal v Tottenham wallpaper

- Mrgnu then made a topic with a picture of ledley king singing an al johnson song

-I replyed with a picture of a shoop da woop over ledley and fabregas's face ( http://images.google.co.uk/images?hl=en ... q=&start=0 )

- Radford found it all racist and it spiraled from there. I had no intent of mine being racist and had created the picture even before i saw ****'s post because when i saw the wallpaper ledley's and fabregas's open mouths reminded me of shoop da woop lol so i thought i would make it, i didn't even know the shoopdawhoop thing was racist untill i actually looked at orgins of it but it is a fucking internet meme and is suppost to be a joke and isn't just used on black people and was originally used on an alien in a cartoon (dragon ball z).

I guess radford's age and political correctness had taken over and he doesn't really understand what happens on the internet apart from on this forum.

g88ner wrote:

Captain Fabregas wrote:because people who don't know what happened just ask questions and then it starts over again meaning it is just a stupid circle of events.

Stop talking in code and just tell us all what the fuck happened?! (not aimed at you, CF )

Deleting threads pisses g88ner off... if people are willing to write a post, then they should stand by it and stop being so gutless as to ask for it to be removed.

Now that Calo has fucked off, we're all adullts so no need to delete threads. If a photo isn't within the rules, then delete the photo... of a post is against forum rules, then delete the post.... not the thread.

Anyway, reading between the lines.... it's something to do with paedo's, racists, Radford, ds and ****. So, without any evidence (after it was deleted) I'll assume one of the latter is one of the former. And that's that.

PM'd you mate

Captain Fabregas wrote:can you just delete every topic that has anything to do with today and stop locking and unlocking threads to reply with a witty comment and close them again? :S

Not that im bothered with what i posted and not really sorry for its content but i am just getting a headache reading all of radford's posts in third person.

So just decide, make it all disappear or keep it all open for discussion but don't let some threads stay open and some locked and others deleted because people who don't know what happened just ask questions and then it starts over again meaning it is just a stupid circle of events.

I have to agree with that point, a mod has chosen to lock down a thread and has given his reason for doing so, I don'r agree but he has done so. Then two other mods several hours later feel they have the right to unlock the thread just so they can chip in with a comment before locking it down again. That is not on