I'm not going to let my thread be hi-jacked any further
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2011 4:37 pm
Flash it's not hypocritical at all. There is a difference between sincerely posting views they are believed to be relevant to the discussion in a thread whetherattacks insults ad hominem complaints and jpegs that are not relevant in any way shape or form to the actual discussion.
Expressing a contrary or alternative opinion in a genuine discussion is not thread hi-jacking. Interfering with the exchange of genuine discussion is,and that is what you and others engage in constantly, and no one can say I do that.
You can debate whether my view is relevant to a thread but the fact is an argument can be made for that being the case. What is the relevance of posting a jpeg of a movie poster? What is the relevance of that? What is the relevance of stating a discussion you don't have to read or a thread you don;'t have to open is boring or irrelevant or anything?
I could care less what you have to post about me. I just think its disingenuous attempts at amateur censorship by making threads unreadable for those who might want to and really inconsiderate of the forum as a whole and wish you'd stop it and stop hiding behind this false equivalnecy in which what ever you define as hi-jacking is whether that is true or not and justiifies genuine hi-jacking on your part and others as well and wish the mods would in fact have a talk about this, as even though I never did anything to justify having to I did try to meet you people part way on this - but guess what - the same people complaining about theread hi-jacking complained about that too.
Have the courage of your convictions and admit what this is about you McDowell and the lot or else else give it up or I will formally ask someone to deal with it.
Expressing a contrary or alternative opinion in a genuine discussion is not thread hi-jacking. Interfering with the exchange of genuine discussion is,and that is what you and others engage in constantly, and no one can say I do that.
You can debate whether my view is relevant to a thread but the fact is an argument can be made for that being the case. What is the relevance of posting a jpeg of a movie poster? What is the relevance of that? What is the relevance of stating a discussion you don't have to read or a thread you don;'t have to open is boring or irrelevant or anything?
I could care less what you have to post about me. I just think its disingenuous attempts at amateur censorship by making threads unreadable for those who might want to and really inconsiderate of the forum as a whole and wish you'd stop it and stop hiding behind this false equivalnecy in which what ever you define as hi-jacking is whether that is true or not and justiifies genuine hi-jacking on your part and others as well and wish the mods would in fact have a talk about this, as even though I never did anything to justify having to I did try to meet you people part way on this - but guess what - the same people complaining about theread hi-jacking complained about that too.
Have the courage of your convictions and admit what this is about you McDowell and the lot or else else give it up or I will formally ask someone to deal with it.
