The Suarez bid was a farce, but about a year later J.Henry admitted that we
had met the buyout clause. Liverpool
illegally rejected the bid. Of course, by the time that news came out, no-one gave a fuck. Liverpool should have been done for that. Bastards.
We should have bid £40.5M or £45M. We would have won at least two league titles by now. Another turning point that didn't go our way
I do think that the first decade of success was largely down to the inherited players who ran the dressing room and gave orders on the pitch and a few canny signings. Dein's influence was also a big factor in actually signing these players, whereas TOF on his own (as he is now) would have baulked at paying 'over the odds' even for a good player. That early influence had died out by 2005-07 when Keown, Vieira, Bergkamp and Henry had all left the club. It's no co-incidence that we've been soft as shite ever since.
augie wrote:I have no doubt that serious fan protests would change things within the club (although whether it would force enough change I don't know) - wenker doesn't like being challenged and would be in no doubt that we are no longer willing to accept this bullshit. I think that serious fan protest would also awaken the board - vocal protests inside and outside the bowl, fan fighting inside and outside, and empty seats aplenty would certainly create alarm in the boardroom and might make them realise that is no longer a minority who want him out
I agree. Fan pressure can make a difference; it just needs to be sustained. I have heard about the Terry Neill protests and the Billy Wright protests. It doesn't happen often at our club, granted, but the end goal was a success.
The board will never sack The Old Fraud, but he
hates to be questioned by any 'peasant' supporter or journalist. It's the only way we can provoke him into having a massive hissy fit and finally fucking off. We need to try to stop that 2019 extension if it's possible. He needs to know he has outstayed his welcome by at least five years and it's time to go.