Let's all laugh at Chelsea

[LeftfootlegendGooner]

Hold on have any of you guys actually read up on the tribunal? She is unlikely to get anywhere near £1.2m if the court finds in her favour. That suggests that she is doing this out of principal rather than trying to squeeze every last penny out of her former employer.

Why would you go through the humiliation of a tribunal, if all you was after was a decent payout?????

For me it's as much seeing how much Chelski and Maureen will squirm.

Ok then wait for her book to come out and multiple interviews bagging loads of dosh, I bet she already has an agent, it's all about money, I've seen ten times worse at workplaces, she was in a job where tensions run high ffs

This first meeting was to lift the cap on a payout...she will not accept £1.2 million....but not about money....

i would do the same, fuck them take them for everything you can

LOL, you can't just make up a figure there are guidelines that the courts go by. For example unfair dismissal is capped at 1 years salary up to around £78k. This is a constructive dismissal case granted, and a bit more complicated, but to say she can determine the amount she sues for is nonsense. This is determined by law.

Yes agreed Court will decide final payout, but she refused a 1.2 million payout, as she insisted a 40% pay rise on her 285K salary as well....

Go back to you ivory towers mate in HR.....

Yep as I said I have heard much much worse and most people have to get on with it or leave their job and find another one, why does she have the right to probably never have to work again after a little spat.

Surely a years salary is more than enough

[nut flush gooner]

Hold on have any of you guys actually read up on the tribunal? She is unlikely to get anywhere near £1.2m if the court finds in her favour. That suggests that she is doing this out of principal rather than trying to squeeze every last penny out of her former employer.

Why would you go through the humiliation of a tribunal, if all you was after was a decent payout?????

For me it's as much seeing how much Chelski and Maureen will squirm.

Ok then wait for her book to come out and multiple interviews bagging loads of dosh, I bet she already has an agent, it's all about money, I've seen ten times worse at workplaces, she was in a job where tensions run high ffs

This first meeting was to lift the cap on a payout...she will not accept £1.2 million....but not about money....

i would do the same, fuck them take them for everything you can

LOL, you can't just make up a figure there are guidelines that the courts go by. For example unfair dismissal is capped at 1 years salary up to around £78k. This is a constructive dismissal case granted, and a bit more complicated, but to say she can determine the amount she sues for is nonsense. This is determined by law.

Yes agreed Court will decide final payout, but she refused a 1.2 million payout, as she insisted a 40% pay rise on her 285K salary as well....

Go back to you ivory towers mate in HR.....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-36460728

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... ow-8126043

Note every reputable newspaper hasn't mentioned what you have quoted Chelsea's "allegations" against her salary demands. If the Daily Mirror is your source for news, I am quite happy to reside in an ivory tower.



Edit: By the way how much is Jamie Vardy's salary going up by this summer? Kind of smacks of double standards when a professional asks for something similar and it ends up in a tribunal. But that's not the issue is it her salary demands.

[Redarmy]

Ok then wait for her book to come out and multiple interviews bagging loads of dosh, I bet she already has an agent, it's all about money, I've seen ten times worse at workplaces, she was in a job where tensions run high ffs

This first meeting was to lift the cap on a payout...she will not accept £1.2 million....but not about money....

i would do the same, fuck them take them for everything you can

LOL, you can't just make up a figure there are guidelines that the courts go by. For example unfair dismissal is capped at 1 years salary up to around £78k. This is a constructive dismissal case granted, and a bit more complicated, but to say she can determine the amount she sues for is nonsense. This is determined by law.

Yes agreed Court will decide final payout, but she refused a 1.2 million payout, as she insisted a 40% pay rise on her 285K salary as well....

Go back to you ivory towers mate in HR.....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-36460728

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... ow-8126043

Note every reputable newspaper hasn't mentioned what you have quoted Chelsea's "allegations" against her salary demands. If the Daily Mirror is your source for news, I am quite happy to reside in an ivory tower.



Edit: By the way how much is Jamie Vardy's salary going up by this summer? Kind of smacks of double standards when a professional asks for something similar and it ends up in a tribunal. But that's not the issue is it her salary demands.

Yes you are good at editing and replying only on issues that you can....

OK yes these are "allegations" put forward by the Chelsea lawyers...i for one not doubting it

WTF has Vardys salary got to do with it...he is a contractor negotiating best deal he can with his employer...fair play to him

[northbank123]

Chelsea can paint her as attention-seeking, unprofessional, a slut or whatever but ultimately it is no defence at all to discrimination and if anything rather than persuading the judge to view her conduct in a poor light and take account of this when it comes to remedies, will just make the judge view Chelsea's employment practices and workplace culture for female employees in an even dimmer light.

[nut flush gooner]

This first meeting was to lift the cap on a payout...she will not accept £1.2 million....but not about money....

i would do the same, fuck them take them for everything you can

LOL, you can't just make up a figure there are guidelines that the courts go by. For example unfair dismissal is capped at 1 years salary up to around £78k. This is a constructive dismissal case granted, and a bit more complicated, but to say she can determine the amount she sues for is nonsense. This is determined by law.

Yes agreed Court will decide final payout, but she refused a 1.2 million payout, as she insisted a 40% pay rise on her 285K salary as well....

Go back to you ivory towers mate in HR.....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-36460728

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... ow-8126043

Note every reputable newspaper hasn't mentioned what you have quoted Chelsea's "allegations" against her salary demands. If the Daily Mirror is your source for news, I am quite happy to reside in an ivory tower.



Edit: By the way how much is Jamie Vardy's salary going up by this summer? Kind of smacks of double standards when a professional asks for something similar and it ends up in a tribunal. But that's not the issue is it her salary demands.

Yes you are good at editing and replying only on issues that you can....

OK yes these are "allegations" put forward by the Chelsea lawyers...i for one not doubting it

WTF has Vardys salary got to do with it...he is a contractor negotiating best deal he can with his employer...fair play to him

I do believe I have replied to everything you have said. If you can't quantify the dedication and hard work required to qualify as a doctor, versus an overpaid footballer I really am wasting my energy. If she was on £240k that's nothing special for a medical professional in the private sector but as I said before that isn't why she is in court. If maureen did call her the daughter of a whore he should be strung up. I get the feeling the players had a lot of time for her and this is one of the reasons Maureen lost the dressing room.

[northbank123]

Strung up for that alone - really?

Are we advocating prison sentences for anyone who calls somebody a son of a bitch as well?

[Redarmy]

Ok then wait for her book to come out and multiple interviews bagging loads of dosh, I bet she already has an agent, it's all about money, I've seen ten times worse at workplaces, she was in a job where tensions run high ffs

This first meeting was to lift the cap on a payout...she will not accept £1.2 million....but not about money....

i would do the same, fuck them take them for everything you can

LOL, you can't just make up a figure there are guidelines that the courts go by. For example unfair dismissal is capped at 1 years salary up to around £78k. This is a constructive dismissal case granted, and a bit more complicated, but to say she can determine the amount she sues for is nonsense. This is determined by law.

Yes agreed Court will decide final payout, but she refused a 1.2 million payout, as she insisted a 40% pay rise on her 285K salary as well....

Go back to you ivory towers mate in HR.....

Yep as I said I have heard much much worse and most people have to get on with it or leave their job and find another one, why does she have the right to probably never have to work again after a little spat.

Surely a years salary is more than enough

how do we know it was not deliberately instigated?

[Redarmy]

LOL, you can't just make up a figure there are guidelines that the courts go by. For example unfair dismissal is capped at 1 years salary up to around £78k. This is a constructive dismissal case granted, and a bit more complicated, but to say she can determine the amount she sues for is nonsense. This is determined by law.

Yes agreed Court will decide final payout, but she refused a 1.2 million payout, as she insisted a 40% pay rise on her 285K salary as well....

Go back to you ivory towers mate in HR.....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-36460728

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... ow-8126043

Note every reputable newspaper hasn't mentioned what you have quoted Chelsea's "allegations" against her salary demands. If the Daily Mirror is your source for news, I am quite happy to reside in an ivory tower.



Edit: By the way how much is Jamie Vardy's salary going up by this summer? Kind of smacks of double standards when a professional asks for something similar and it ends up in a tribunal. But that's not the issue is it her salary demands.

Yes you are good at editing and replying only on issues that you can....

OK yes these are "allegations" put forward by the Chelsea lawyers...i for one not doubting it

WTF has Vardys salary got to do with it...he is a contractor negotiating best deal he can with his employer...fair play to him

I do believe I have replied to everything you have said. If you can't quantify the dedication and hard work required to qualify as a doctor, versus an overpaid footballer I really am wasting my energy. If she was on £240k that's nothing special for a medical professional in the private sector but as I said before that isn't why she is in court. If maureen did call her the daughter of a whore he should be strung up. I get the feeling the players had a lot of time for her and this is one of the reasons Maureen lost the dressing room.

LOL hanging people...thats a very tolerant attitude....you just lost it

[Red Snapper]

Strung up for that alone - really?

Are we advocating prison sentences for anyone who calls somebody a son of a bitch as well?

Well we are talking about Mourinho here so I would add drawing and quartering too.

[augie]

This first meeting was to lift the cap on a payout...she will not accept £1.2 million....but not about money....

i would do the same, fuck them take them for everything you can

LOL, you can't just make up a figure there are guidelines that the courts go by. For example unfair dismissal is capped at 1 years salary up to around £78k. This is a constructive dismissal case granted, and a bit more complicated, but to say she can determine the amount she sues for is nonsense. This is determined by law.

Yes agreed Court will decide final payout, but she refused a 1.2 million payout, as she insisted a 40% pay rise on her 285K salary as well....

Go back to you ivory towers mate in HR.....

Yep as I said I have heard much much worse and most people have to get on with it or leave their job and find another one, why does she have the right to probably never have to work again after a little spat.

Surely a years salary is more than enough

how do we know it was not deliberately instigated?

How the f.uck can you "instigate" going in to treat an injured player ? Thats just ridiculous

[augie]

Eva Carneiro started her employment tribunal today, Chelsea offered £1.2m to settle out of court. They have labelled her a self publicist and she has alleged that Mourinho called her the "daughter of a whore" in Portugese. Lot's of other allegations about the way Chelsea treated her.

You would think in 2016, that women shouldn't have to put up with this sort of shit. As usual though, football is light years behind the real world.

Maureen is due to appear in the tribunal at some stage, will be interested to see how he tries to squirm out of this one.

WTF I've been called worse but didn't get offered 1.2 million, as usual it's all about the money, she'd have to work years for that, oh well let's use the women angle

Normally I would agree with you and it gets really tiresome and frustrating when people use the sexism or racism argument when it suits them, BUT lets be honest here and admit that moaninho probably wouldnt have spoken to a male physio like that cos he would have had his lights punched out for doing so. Lets also be honest and admit that most of us are subconsciously old fashioned in our views about women being involved in male soccer - I can only speak for myself and say that my interest in this case would be minimal if it was a male doctor that was suing the chavs and moaninho, and I certainly wouldnt have any interest in the case if she was some old dog that nobody would want to shag Straight away I am viewing this case as different because she is a (fit ) woman and I reckon there are thousands more like me even if they dont admit it.
Do you guys think that she could have walked into another top job in football if she had of just walked away from the chavs ? She would be viewed as weak and an easy target for every arrogant dickhead in the game, and in my opinion she had to sue to show that she will not accept being bullied by an arrogant c.unt like moaninho If the chavs as a club had anything about themselves then they would have dealt with this straight away by discipling moaninho, but instead they decided to stand by a manager that has history of being a bullying and causing trouble in every club he has been at.

Maybe I am blinded cos of a total hatred towards the chavs and moaninho, but I do think that she had to persue this. The most she can get for lack of earnings is 70k but of course she could then get a big payout for damages if she wins - that being said, is it likely that any payout will exceed £1.2m ? Personally I doubt it so I would lean on the side of saying that this isnt about the money, BUT at the same time I dont really care if it is cos she is perfectly right imo

Btw I really hope that she hasnt shagged hazard and/or ivanovic like the rumours have long suggested, cos the gloves will def come off now and she will get torn apart whether her husband is sitting beside her or not

[nut flush gooner]

LOL, you can't just make up a figure there are guidelines that the courts go by. For example unfair dismissal is capped at 1 years salary up to around £78k. This is a constructive dismissal case granted, and a bit more complicated, but to say she can determine the amount she sues for is nonsense. This is determined by law.

Yes agreed Court will decide final payout, but she refused a 1.2 million payout, as she insisted a 40% pay rise on her 285K salary as well....

Go back to you ivory towers mate in HR.....

Yep as I said I have heard much much worse and most people have to get on with it or leave their job and find another one, why does she have the right to probably never have to work again after a little spat.

Surely a years salary is more than enough

how do we know it was not deliberately instigated?

How the f.uck can you "instigate" going in to treat an injured player ? Thats just ridiculous

Haha, you really wonder what substances are consumed by the regulars on this forum.

[Clash]

I think I prefer the Hibs physio to this Eva whatsname!





No doubt more down to earth and an Edinburgh accent on a woman does me every time. Unless they're really fat obviously

[Redarmy]

LOL, you can't just make up a figure there are guidelines that the courts go by. For example unfair dismissal is capped at 1 years salary up to around £78k. This is a constructive dismissal case granted, and a bit more complicated, but to say she can determine the amount she sues for is nonsense. This is determined by law.

Yes agreed Court will decide final payout, but she refused a 1.2 million payout, as she insisted a 40% pay rise on her 285K salary as well....

Go back to you ivory towers mate in HR.....

Yep as I said I have heard much much worse and most people have to get on with it or leave their job and find another one, why does she have the right to probably never have to work again after a little spat.

Surely a years salary is more than enough

how do we know it was not deliberately instigated?

How the f.uck can you "instigate" going in to treat an injured player ? Thats just ridiculous

Not that particular incident...but Mourinho is a ticking bomb.....would not have to wait too long for any kind of incident, probably goes off on one every other day

[Redarmy]

She was around the first team quite frequently in her role as club doctor, IMO knowing Mourinho don't think he would respect anyone as his language has proved, this just happened to happen with live TV cameras watching