As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Clash wrote:I think I prefer the Hibs physio to this Eva whatsname!
No doubt more down to earth and an Edinburgh accent on a woman does me every time. Unless they're really fat obviously
When hibs won the cup final it showed a clip of her singing "sunshine on leith" and the way she moved her tongue as she was singing certainly got my juices flowing
Was she hanging from the cross bar pitch singing this then
Yer feckin' joking PAL! ( )Even the poshest one's from scoh land sound like they wanna beat ye feckin hid in even when being nice. ya nooooo!
DB10GOONER wrote:Having seen my brother go through something similar years ago, I can tell you straight up, it's all about brinkmanship and bluffing. Both sides hold out as long as possible hoping the other side will crack first. By the time it reaches a tribunal the employer is usually the one that folds as going through the whole process can take away the confidentiality that an out of court settlement "on the steps" (as it's called in Oireland) can offer and can make them look very bad in the media. Most employers are far more concerned with bad publicity than most individuals would be. I was there with my brother as a witness and it was bizarre to see his lawyer scum go to their lawyer scum and "barter" the offered amount back and forth.
There is absolutely no way to know if the ex-chav doctor chick was standing up for her principles or if she is just a money hungry bastard. How could any one of you know that? Do any of you know her personally?
As I said in my summary, I think it may have been a combination of money and principle but I am very doubtful it is money only. Not many people play poker with £1.2m stakes unless they think they will win.
Would have been fun to see Chelsea's noses rubbed in it mind.
I was hoping it would be very public and very embarrassing for the chav and in particular Moron-hio himself. Shame it wasn't.
everyone was hoping he would be in the dock, fuck only knows what he would have said...now that would be interesting
"Please don’t call me arrogant, but I’m European champion and I think I’m a special one. I offered the bitch my special cock. She said no. She is limited. I think she is one of these people who is a voyeur. She likes to watch other people. There are some bitches who, when they are at home, have a big telescope to see what happens in other families. She speaks, speaks, speaks about Hazard. Fuck her".
I hate that modern "Selfie Bimbo / Argos catalogue Model" look. The over elaborate eyebrows, the heavy orange Oompa-Loompa make up, and the fucking retarded fucking stupid fucking pout. So many 18-25 year old birds nowadays have that look. You scrape all that make-up off and 90% of them are dogs.
northbank123 wrote:Fair point DB10 however (and I believe this is the correct modern-day PC terminology) she would most definitely "get it".
Alright, Keysey - calm down. Plenty of them out there for you and Greysey to "smash".
TBH, if my previous beer to common sense / taste ratio is anything to go by, she would either "get it", or a couple hours and 10 more beers later, her fat ugly friend would "get it".
I hate that modern "Selfie Bimbo / Argos catalogue Model" look. The over elaborate eyebrows, the heavy orange Oompa-Loompa make up, and the fucking retarded fucking stupid fucking pout. So many 18-25 year old birds nowadays have that look. You scrape all that make-up off and 90% of them are dogs.
money grabbing dogs....cannot see the Vardy lookalike with a WAG in tow, wonder why that is
nut flush gooner wrote:So it's done. Settlement reached so we will never know exactly what happened.
One thing though Maureen turned up today 6 days before he was summoned. So it would appear he/chelski have apologised to her and possibly increased the compensation. Clearly carrying on with the tribunal would probably expose Chelsea and Maureen in a bad way. But we already know what a nasty club and nasty piece of work Maureen is.
Right last word on this one....
IF it was a matter of principal an apology would suffice, but will wait a long time for that one
She had a just grievance, but anything up to £5 million seems a tad excessive, but thats Chelsea money so not too bothered
There you go I'm done.....dont really give a fuck about any of them
Unreal you talk bollocks for a day then you say you don't give a fuck about them, lmao.
As I said Chelsea backed down because they know her allegations where true, and would be damaging to the clubs reputation. She didn't take the case to tribunal purely for the money, it was because she had a genuine grievance. Where did you get the "up to £5m" settlement from the daily star?
nut flush gooner wrote:So it's done. Settlement reached so we will never know exactly what happened.
One thing though Maureen turned up today 6 days before he was summoned. So it would appear he/chelski have apologised to her and possibly increased the compensation. Clearly carrying on with the tribunal would probably expose Chelsea and Maureen in a bad way. But we already know what a nasty club and nasty piece of work Maureen is.
Right last word on this one....
IF it was a matter of principal an apology would suffice, but will wait a long time for that one
She had a just grievance, but anything up to £5 million seems a tad excessive, but thats Chelsea money so not too bothered
There you go I'm done.....dont really give a fuck about any of them
Unreal you talk bollocks for a day then you say you don't give a fuck about them, lmao.
As I said Chelsea backed down because they know her allegations where true, and would be damaging to the clubs reputation. She didn't take the case to tribunal purely for the money, it was because she had a genuine grievance. Where did you get the "up to £5m" settlement from the daily star?
northbank123 wrote:Fair point DB10 however (and I believe this is the correct modern-day PC terminology) she would most definitely "get it".
Alright, Keysey - calm down. Plenty of them out there for you and Greysey to "smash".
TBH, if my previous beer to common sense / taste ratio is anything to go by, she would either "get it", or a couple hours and 10 more beers later, her fat ugly friend would "get it".
Sometimes shit just happens.
I have a buddy who has shagged some ugly birds in his time, and he has always justified it by claiming that "it is a results business"
northbank123 wrote:Fair point DB10 however (and I believe this is the correct modern-day PC terminology) she would most definitely "get it".
Alright, Keysey - calm down. Plenty of them out there for you and Greysey to "smash".
TBH, if my previous beer to common sense / taste ratio is anything to go by, she would either "get it", or a couple hours and 10 more beers later, her fat ugly friend would "get it".
Sometimes shit just happens.
I have a buddy who has shagged some ugly birds in his time, and he has always justified it by claiming that "it is a results business"
Many years ago, back in the day, in my foolish youth, etc etc, my mates and I would often hold "Ugly Night". The premise being we would get drunk as fuck, go clubbing and a competition would ensue to see who could shift the ugliest bird. The "winner", and I use that term fucking loosely, got a free night on the beer the following night.
This competition took on a bit of a life of it's own and at one point had descended into not just pulling the ugliest bird but having to shark her - and then, Dear God alcohol will fuck you up, we got to the point where at least one other lad had to witness said sharking. Christ, me being the competitive type, the amount of times I'd be banging away on Mary Jane Godzilla in the back of a car and look over my shoulder to see one or two of the lads peering in the window, having a drink, sometimes a bag of chips, and scoring me out of 10.
northbank123 wrote:Fair point DB10 however (and I believe this is the correct modern-day PC terminology) she would most definitely "get it".
Alright, Keysey - calm down. Plenty of them out there for you and Greysey to "smash".
TBH, if my previous beer to common sense / taste ratio is anything to go by, she would either "get it", or a couple hours and 10 more beers later, her fat ugly friend would "get it".
Sometimes shit just happens.
I have a buddy who has shagged some ugly birds in his time, and he has always justified it by claiming that "it is a results business"
Many years ago, back in the day, in my foolish youth, etc etc, my mates and I would often hold "Ugly Night". The premise being we would get drunk as fuck, go clubbing and a competition would ensue to see who could shift the ugliest bird. The "winner", and I use that term fucking loosely, got a free night on the beer the following night.
This competition took on a bit of a life of it's own and at one point had descended into not just pulling the ugliest bird but having to shark her - and then, Dear God alcohol will fuck you up, we got to the point where at least one other lad had to witness said sharking. Christ, me being the competitive type, the amount of times I'd be banging away on Mary Jane Godzilla in the back of a car and look over my shoulder to see one or two of the lads peering in the window, having a drink, sometimes a bag of chips, and scoring me out of 10.
I don't drink anymore.
You do realise that mary jane Godzilla was probably having a similar competition with her buddies don't you ??
northbank123 wrote:Fair point DB10 however (and I believe this is the correct modern-day PC terminology) she would most definitely "get it".
Alright, Keysey - calm down. Plenty of them out there for you and Greysey to "smash".
TBH, if my previous beer to common sense / taste ratio is anything to go by, she would either "get it", or a couple hours and 10 more beers later, her fat ugly friend would "get it".
Sometimes shit just happens.
I have a buddy who has shagged some ugly birds in his time, and he has always justified it by claiming that "it is a results business"
Many years ago, back in the day, in my foolish youth, etc etc, my mates and I would often hold "Ugly Night". The premise being we would get drunk as fuck, go clubbing and a competition would ensue to see who could shift the ugliest bird. The "winner", and I use that term fucking loosely, got a free night on the beer the following night.
This competition took on a bit of a life of it's own and at one point had descended into not just pulling the ugliest bird but having to shark her - and then, Dear God alcohol will fuck you up, we got to the point where at least one other lad had to witness said sharking. Christ, me being the competitive type, the amount of times I'd be banging away on Mary Jane Godzilla in the back of a car and look over my shoulder to see one or two of the lads peering in the window, having a drink, sometimes a bag of chips, and scoring me out of 10.
I don't drink anymore.
You do realise that mary jane Godzilla was probably having a similar competition with her buddies don't you ??
Yep. I believe they called it the "Who can pull the biggest cock" competition.
And you know, I've always wondered which definition of "cock" they adhered to!
Btw for all you non dubs, when DB10 talks about shagging some dog in the back of a car, he either means that he is shagging her in the back of his pony and cart, or he means that he was shagging her in the back of a car that they had tea-leafed earlier in the night
augie wrote: Btw for all you non dubs, when DB10 talks about shagging some dog in the back of a car, he either means that he is shagging her in the back of his pony and cart, or he means that he was shagging her in the back of a car that they had tea-leafed earlier in the night
Shame it wasn't. 
