Ozil and Sanchez want £250k a week

[augie]

PAY THEM!!!

DUMP RAMSEY!!!!

But include a clause in their contracts that every time they go missing in a big game, they don't get paid anything that month

[DB10GOONER]

PAY THEM!!!

DUMP RAMSEY!!!!

But include a clause in their contracts that every time they go missing in a big game, they don't get paid anything that month

I have no problem with that!

Also; DUMP WENGER!!

[augie]

PAY THEM!!!

DUMP RAMSEY!!!!

But include a clause in their contracts that every time they go missing in a big game, they don't get paid anything that month

I have no problem with that!

Also; DUMP WENGER!!

And every time that c.unt gets tactically outsmarted in a game, he should pay us back £1m - when he starts losing money left right and centre, he wont be long packing his bag and fcuking off back to france

[DB10GOONER]

PAY THEM!!!

DUMP RAMSEY!!!!

But include a clause in their contracts that every time they go missing in a big game, they don't get paid anything that month

I have no problem with that!

Also; DUMP WENGER!!

And every time that c.unt gets tactically outsmarted in a game, he should pay us back £1m - when he starts losing money left right and centre, he wont be long packing his bag and fcuking off back to france

I like your plan. It would take half a game to be rid of him!

[begeegs]

Interesting story in the Telegraph this morning saying that we are likely going to pay Sanchez, but not Ozil. For me, that is the right thing to do. I like Ozil, but I think that he is definitely more expendable than Sanchez. Although if his replacement is Jack, I would say 'hell no!'.

I'd rather see Jack playing deep next season and Rambo sold.

[rodders999]

Interesting story in the Telegraph this morning saying that we are likely going to pay Sanchez, but not Ozil. For me, that is the right thing to do. I like Ozil, but I think that he is definitely more expendable than Sanchez. Although if his replacement is Jack, I would say 'hell no!'.

I'd rather see Jack playing deep next season and Rambo sold.

It's hard to know what to believe, John Cross a few weeks back said he heard the Ozil deal was all but done and the Sanchez deal had hit a snag because he wanted a release clause put in it that the club refused. Who knows.....

[Gunner Rob]

Interesting story in the Telegraph this morning saying that we are likely going to pay Sanchez, but not Ozil. For me, that is the right thing to do. I like Ozil, but I think that he is definitely more expendable than Sanchez. Although if his replacement is Jack, I would say 'hell no!'.

I'd rather see Jack playing deep next season and Rambo sold.

the club must realise that if they let Sanchez go then all this talk in recent years of being able to afford the best players is going to look a bit stupid.
they will be able to cover up Ozil leaving if they kept Sanchez, although we would also have to spend big again to replace him

[Redarmy]

When asked about the situation on Thursday morning, Wenger said: 'I believe we live in the world where Sanchez and Ozil have a lot of money and can choose where they play.
We will do the maximum we can for every single player. These players have 18 months left. They will stay for 18 months and hopefully much longer. 'I can't give any assurances. They have 18 months and are completely committed.


hardly reassuring...this moron Wenger undertaking the negotiations.....the wanker struggles with a Coat Zip FFS

[augie]

Maybe I am naïve but I do not think that wages will be the deal breaker if either/both leave - for me I think that they will leave either for a new challenge or to win trophies elsewhere. Of course if they leave, the akb will say that it was down to the extortinate demands both were making

[Kypie1990]

Yes please

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... nd-9287158

For me marco reus is twice the player that alexis is

id rather have reus and sachez and sell ozil tbh.

Reus is a top player but he's not on the level of Sanchez and has been injured quite a lot as of late, and ozil is a completely different player to reus and wouldn't replace the hole that ozil left!

[augie]

Yes please

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... nd-9287158

For me marco reus is twice the player that alexis is

id rather have reus and sachez and sell ozil tbh.

Reus is a top player but he's not on the level of Sanchez and has been injured quite a lot as of late, and ozil is a completely different player to reus and wouldn't replace the hole that ozil left!

Reus is a better player than sanchez - alexis is a streaky player imo, and when he is in a run of form like he is at the mo, then he is almost unplayable However it also should be recognized that on big days he often goes missing and his ball control and link up are sometimes horrendous

[Gunner Rob]

for me it comes down to this.
say we pay Sanchez £250,000 per week what do you find more obscene - Sanchez on £250,000 or Walcott on £140,000.

personally I find paying Walcott £140,000 is more obscene (I would find that if it were per year as well!)

[Redarmy]

for me it comes down to this.
say we pay Sanchez £250,000 per week what do you find more obscene - Sanchez on £250,000 or Walcott on £140,000.

personally I find paying Walcott £140,000 is more obscene (I would find that if it were per year as well!)

ha ha ...yes don't think Walcott or Ramsey are rushing to leave...

more obscene is Wenger on £9MILLION a year!!!!

[OneBardGooner]

Interesting story in the Telegraph this morning saying that we are likely going to pay Sanchez, but not Ozil. For me, that is the right thing to do. I like Ozil, but I think that he is definitely more expendable than Sanchez. Although if his replacement is Jack, I would say 'hell no!'.

I'd rather see Jack playing deep next season and Rambo sold.

I think we should keep them both - Ozil and Alexis are not only on a totally other level compared to the rest of the team/squad - as their footballing skills go, but they are 2 or 3 moves/thoughts/decisions ahead of everyone - BUT Alexis and Ozil ARE On the same wavelength - And they have started to 'click' beautifully. They compiment one another and if one of them goes it would not only be detrimental to the team as a whole but to the other player - because they dovetail amazingly well on the pitch.

Also: Chelsea are prepared to move for Alexis Sanchez if the 27-year-old striker does not resolve a contract stand-off with the Gunners. The Blues want to pair the Chilean with Diego Costa, 28. (Daily Mirror)

Well FUCKOFF You CHAVSCUM CUN.TS...

And I think we should dump: Ramsey, Gibbs, and Walnutt.

[butts8]

Then it needs to be done. We cant get caught cold, lagging behind the times with regards to salaries and transfer fees....again

You give these players that cash, and they are never distracted or tempted to leave again.

Same goes for Bellerin. Why not anticipate his potential, and give him 150k a week?

We are a cash rich club with tremendous cash flow and revenue streams. We have the capacity to spend this type of money. So spend it.

Caving in and paying 35m for Mustafi is now looking an excellent decision. Imagine if the penny pinching ways go the better of Wenger and he chose not to drop 35m on Mustafi - Kosicleny would be baby sitting Rob Holding. Although instead, we have a top centre half pairing - the best since Campbell and Toure in 2005.

Im over losing players. We havent sold anyone of note since RVP, and I could not tolerate ever going down that route again.

Bellerin, Ozil, Sanchez need to be tied up. If even one of them is lost - it just sends a message that Arsenal are willy nilly in terms of a desire to actually compete.

A winning culture starts in the boardroom. If you go to long lengths to keep your best players, it will translate to success on the field.

Well said