As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Technically not Arsenal related cos we all recognize that we wont be signing anyone today, but I thought that a debate on transfers involving other clubs might be worth having. I'm curious to see what deals us Gooners think are good deals for those involved, or which are bad moves, or which are absolutely bizarre
Personally I think hull's business to date is bizarre - selling two first 11 starters (Snodgrass and Livermore) when you are up to your tits in a relegation battle, seems absolutely ridiculous to me Anyone joining them at this stage better have a relegation release clause in their contracts
The mackems dealings to date seem ok - getting rid of the left back chav reject for £14m, and buying Oviedo and Gibson (an average player) from the money and still having change, seems to be good business. Of course they still need centre backs and strikers
In an effort to make this boring as a bastard vanity thread even a tad interesting, I will repost this from the transfer thread.
Discuss.
Rodders, did you see your Nat in her sprayed on white dress yesterday...? Man, her belly and ass have chubbed out a bit. Nice tits but she's a tubby fucker now.
I don't watch the hysterical fabricated non-event that is transfer deadline day, but am I right in thinking tubby Nat was replaced beside that arse-vadge Jim White for the run in last night... by a younger fitter blonde bird...?
DB10GOONER wrote:In an effort to make this boring as a bastard vanity thread even a tad interesting, I will repost this from the transfer thread.
Discuss.
Rodders, did you see your Nat in her sprayed on white dress yesterday...? Man, her belly and ass have chubbed out a bit. Nice tits but she's a tubby fucker now.
I don't watch the hysterical fabricated non-event that is transfer deadline day, but am I right in thinking tubby Nat was replaced beside that arse-vadge Jim White for the run in last night... by a younger fitter blonde bird...?
I suggested last year that she was putting on weight - as they said in Bad Boys 2, I hate it when a bitch lets herself go like that
DB10GOONER wrote:In an effort to make this boring as a bastard vanity thread even a tad interesting, I will repost this from the transfer thread.
Discuss.
Rodders, did you see your Nat in her sprayed on white dress yesterday...? Man, her belly and ass have chubbed out a bit. Nice tits but she's a tubby fucker now.
I don't watch the hysterical fabricated non-event that is transfer deadline day, but am I right in thinking tubby Nat was replaced beside that arse-vadge Jim White for the run in last night... by a younger fitter blonde bird...?
I suggested last year that she was putting on weight - as they said in Bad Boys 2, I hate it when a bitch lets herself go like that
I believe the correct response to that would be for me to write; "Word, motherfucker".
augie wrote:Technically not Arsenal related cos we all recognize that we wont be signing anyone today, but I thought that a debate on transfers involving other clubs might be worth having. I'm curious to see what deals us Gooners think are good deals for those involved, or which are bad moves, or which are absolutely bizarre
Personally I think hull's business to date is bizarre - selling two first 11 starters (Snodgrass and Livermore) when you are up to your tits in a relegation battle, seems absolutely ridiculous to me Anyone joining them at this stage better have a relegation release clause in their contracts
The mackems dealings to date seem ok - getting rid of the left back chav reject for £14m, and buying Oviedo and Gibson (an average player) from the money and still having change, seems to be good business. Of course they still need centre backs and strikers
Any other thoughts ?
Thought Fat Sam pulled off some good deals. Jeffrey Schlupp, Patrick van Aanholt, Mamdou Sakho, Milovojevic all look like good signings, addressing the primary problems they have. Hull have filled out their squad but Sunderland have signed players that were good 5 years ago, none of whom can score goals, which is their main problem.