LOL!! yeah probably Barca as all of europes elite want Wengerxisstential wrote:By the time that happens, at the end of the season, he will have bigger problems, as he'll be in the process of getting fired from his new club.markyp wrote:I have a feeling Wenger is scared to leave as I imagine he is wary of someone coming in and doing a whole lot better than him possibly wining the league straight off and making him look a right dick,imagine the embarrassment it would cause him if that did happen,TOF really would have nowhere to hide
THE WENGER THREAD
Re: THE WENGER THREAD
Re: THE WENGER THREAD
Cech 10m, Debuchy 8m, Kosicleny 10m, Mustafi 35m, Monreal 8m, Sanchez 35m, Ramsey 5m, Walcott 12m, Ozil 42m, Xhaka 35m, Welveck 16m, Chambers 16m, Perez 16m, Chamberlain 10m, Cazorla 17m, Giroud 12m, Elneny 5m, Gabriel 15m, Mertesacker 8m.
Any player who cost the club over 5m and is still on the books = 325m.
Begovic 8m, Courtious 6m, Ivanovic 8m, Cahill 8m, Luiz 30m, Zouma 15m, Azperliceuta 7m, Kante 30m, Fabregas 35m, Costa 30m, Hazard 32m, Willian 30m, Matic 25m, Pedro 20m, Batshuayi 33m, Moses 8m, Cuadrado 26m.
Any player on the books who cost Chelsea over 5m = 352m.
I had to double check to make sure my Microsoft excel wasnt broken. So thats the difference in costs between out two squads - 27m pounds. Tell me if I am missing any Chelsea player, tell me if I am underselling the cost of their sqaud.
And yet, 'unlike Chelsea, Wenger is working on a budget'. Honest go do, why does no *word censored* in the media point this out? It really is a shocking failure in journalism to keep reporting on Wenger's 'budget'.
We cant fuk this french fool of soon enough. He really needs to be fuked off. I always thought our expenditure to Chelsea, United and City was much closer than people believe, however I never expected it to be so close.
If Wenger didnt have the 'works on a budget' narrative, he would be talked about in the same breadth as Steve McClaren.
Any player who cost the club over 5m and is still on the books = 325m.
Begovic 8m, Courtious 6m, Ivanovic 8m, Cahill 8m, Luiz 30m, Zouma 15m, Azperliceuta 7m, Kante 30m, Fabregas 35m, Costa 30m, Hazard 32m, Willian 30m, Matic 25m, Pedro 20m, Batshuayi 33m, Moses 8m, Cuadrado 26m.
Any player on the books who cost Chelsea over 5m = 352m.
I had to double check to make sure my Microsoft excel wasnt broken. So thats the difference in costs between out two squads - 27m pounds. Tell me if I am missing any Chelsea player, tell me if I am underselling the cost of their sqaud.
And yet, 'unlike Chelsea, Wenger is working on a budget'. Honest go do, why does no *word censored* in the media point this out? It really is a shocking failure in journalism to keep reporting on Wenger's 'budget'.
We cant fuk this french fool of soon enough. He really needs to be fuked off. I always thought our expenditure to Chelsea, United and City was much closer than people believe, however I never expected it to be so close.
If Wenger didnt have the 'works on a budget' narrative, he would be talked about in the same breadth as Steve McClaren.
- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62208
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: THE WENGER THREAD
Where did you get those figures? From the hyper-reliable tabloid press?Wilson wrote:Cech 10m, Debuchy 8m, Kosicleny 10m, Mustafi 35m, Monreal 8m, Sanchez 35m, Ramsey 5m, Walcott 12m, Ozil 42m, Xhaka 35m, Welveck 16m, Chambers 16m, Perez 16m, Chamberlain 10m, Cazorla 17m, Giroud 12m, Elneny 5m, Gabriel 15m, Mertesacker 8m.
Any player who cost the club over 5m and is still on the books = 325m.
Begovic 8m, Courtious 6m, Ivanovic 8m, Cahill 8m, Luiz 30m, Zouma 15m, Azperliceuta 7m, Kante 30m, Fabregas 35m, Costa 30m, Hazard 32m, Willian 30m, Matic 25m, Pedro 20m, Batshuayi 33m, Moses 8m, Cuadrado 26m.
Any player on the books who cost Chelsea over 5m = 352m.
I had to double check to make sure my Microsoft excel wasnt broken. So thats the difference in costs between out two squads - 27m pounds. Tell me if I am missing any Chelsea player, tell me if I am underselling the cost of their sqaud.
And yet, 'unlike Chelsea, Wenger is working on a budget'. Honest go do, why does no *word censored* in the media point this out? It really is a shocking failure in journalism to keep reporting on Wenger's 'budget'.
We cant fuk this french fool of soon enough. He really needs to be fuked off. I always thought our expenditure to Chelsea, United and City was much closer than people believe, however I never expected it to be so close.
If Wenger didnt have the 'works on a budget' narrative, he would be talked about in the same breadth as Steve McClaren.

- DB10GOONER
- Posts: 62208
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:06 pm
- Location: Dublin, Ireland.
- Contact:
Re: THE WENGER THREAD
The speculation (and that is all it is) about Sanchez and Ozil's "demands" needs a bit of perspective here.
1. We have no idea how much they have "demanded" from Arsenal. That is all media speculation.
2. We have no idea what the club have decided or what they have said to both players. That is all media speculation.
So let's all try and keep our knickers unbunched until something official is announced...

1. We have no idea how much they have "demanded" from Arsenal. That is all media speculation.
2. We have no idea what the club have decided or what they have said to both players. That is all media speculation.
So let's all try and keep our knickers unbunched until something official is announced...


-
- Posts: 825
- Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2016 1:06 pm
Re: THE WENGER THREAD
The 67-year-old duffer has confirmed, from his power base in Islington, that he has no plans to step down in the next three years at least despite clear evidence of relentless decline under his leadership
http://metro.co.uk/2017/02/26/jeremy-co ... w-6474534/
http://metro.co.uk/2017/02/26/jeremy-co ... w-6474534/
-
- Posts: 4861
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:33 am
- Location: In a darkened room
Re: THE WENGER THREAD
Bob Bayliss wrote:The 67-year-old duffer has confirmed, from his power base in Islington, that he has no plans to step down in the next three years at least despite clear evidence of relentless decline under his leadership
http://metro.co.uk/2017/02/26/jeremy-co ... w-6474534/

Re: THE WENGER THREAD
Those are the general figures. They are not exact to a point. However the deals are always leaked to the press - the fees of transfers is one of the things the press normally get right.DB10GOONER wrote:Where did you get those figures? From the hyper-reliable tabloid press?Wilson wrote:Cech 10m, Debuchy 8m, Kosicleny 10m, Mustafi 35m, Monreal 8m, Sanchez 35m, Ramsey 5m, Walcott 12m, Ozil 42m, Xhaka 35m, Welveck 16m, Chambers 16m, Perez 16m, Chamberlain 10m, Cazorla 17m, Giroud 12m, Elneny 5m, Gabriel 15m, Mertesacker 8m.
Any player who cost the club over 5m and is still on the books = 325m.
Begovic 8m, Courtious 6m, Ivanovic 8m, Cahill 8m, Luiz 30m, Zouma 15m, Azperliceuta 7m, Kante 30m, Fabregas 35m, Costa 30m, Hazard 32m, Willian 30m, Matic 25m, Pedro 20m, Batshuayi 33m, Moses 8m, Cuadrado 26m.
Any player on the books who cost Chelsea over 5m = 352m.
I had to double check to make sure my Microsoft excel wasnt broken. So thats the difference in costs between out two squads - 27m pounds. Tell me if I am missing any Chelsea player, tell me if I am underselling the cost of their sqaud.
And yet, 'unlike Chelsea, Wenger is working on a budget'. Honest go do, why does no *word censored* in the media point this out? It really is a shocking failure in journalism to keep reporting on Wenger's 'budget'.
We cant fuk this french fool of soon enough. He really needs to be fuked off. I always thought our expenditure to Chelsea, United and City was much closer than people believe, however I never expected it to be so close.
If Wenger didnt have the 'works on a budget' narrative, he would be talked about in the same breadth as Steve McClaren.
-
- Posts: 9800
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 3:05 pm
Re: THE WENGER THREAD
the similarities between Corbyn and Wenger are remarkable reallyfalkirk goon wrote:Bob Bayliss wrote:The 67-year-old duffer has confirmed, from his power base in Islington, that he has no plans to step down in the next three years at least despite clear evidence of relentless decline under his leadership
http://metro.co.uk/2017/02/26/jeremy-co ... w-6474534/

AKBs - current Labour Party members
Corbyn is even chasing his own 4th place finish behind the Tories, Lib Dems and UKIP

- OneBardGooner
- Posts: 48313
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
- Location: Close To The Edge
Re: THE WENGER THREAD
Gunner Rob wrote:the similarities between Corbyn and Wenger are remarkable reallyfalkirk goon wrote:Bob Bayliss wrote:The 67-year-old duffer has confirmed, from his power base in Islington, that he has no plans to step down in the next three years at least despite clear evidence of relentless decline under his leadership
http://metro.co.uk/2017/02/26/jeremy-co ... w-6474534/![]()
AKBs - current Labour Party members
Corbyn is even chasing his own 4th place finish behind the Tories, Lib Dems and UKIP

Re: THE WENGER THREAD
I keep hearing fans say that it's a disgrace if Sanchez is allowed to leave, but id argue that an increased wage is low down on Sanchez's priority list. The club could offer him a crazy amount of money, but does anyone expect Sanchez to sign up for top 4 finishes, embarrassment's in Europe, and being surrounded by average players. The guy is a winner, and will leave because he knows we are miles away from challenging for actual success.
- OneBardGooner
- Posts: 48313
- Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
- Location: Close To The Edge
Re: THE WENGER THREAD
BBC Website:
"Arsenal defender Hector Bellerin, 21, will reject a move to Barcelona in favour of joining Manchester City. (Don Balon, via Daily Star)"
So we are still a selling club despite the millions in the bank earning interest for wiggy & the cluelessCUNT
#WENGER OUT - NOTHING ELSE WILL SUFFICE - NOTHING ELSE MATTERS! (Cue Metallica!)

"Arsenal defender Hector Bellerin, 21, will reject a move to Barcelona in favour of joining Manchester City. (Don Balon, via Daily Star)"
So we are still a selling club despite the millions in the bank earning interest for wiggy & the cluelessCUNT
#WENGER OUT - NOTHING ELSE WILL SUFFICE - NOTHING ELSE MATTERS! (Cue Metallica!)



Re: THE WENGER THREAD
Well either way it's the board and manager to blame - we have the money so no excuse there and if it's because he wants to win things then it is also their fault because we haven't shown enough intent to win them. Either way I'm done with Arsene FC or Arsenal PLC (Kroenke).BFG4 wrote:I keep hearing fans say that it's a disgrace if Sanchez is allowed to leave, but id argue that an increased wage is low down on Sanchez's priority list. The club could offer him a crazy amount of money, but does anyone expect Sanchez to sign up for top 4 finishes, embarrassment's in Europe, and being surrounded by average players. The guy is a winner, and will leave because he knows we are miles away from challenging for actual success.
-
- Posts: 9800
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 3:05 pm
Re: THE WENGER THREAD
OneBardGooner wrote:Gunner Rob wrote:the similarities between Corbyn and Wenger are remarkable reallyfalkirk goon wrote:Bob Bayliss wrote:The 67-year-old duffer has confirmed, from his power base in Islington, that he has no plans to step down in the next three years at least despite clear evidence of relentless decline under his leadership
http://metro.co.uk/2017/02/26/jeremy-co ... w-6474534/![]()
AKBs - current Labour Party members
Corbyn is even chasing his own 4th place finish behind the Tories, Lib Dems and UKIPI see you have been reading my Posts in the Basement !?
no I had thought that for some time - will go and read your post now though

- Perryashburtongroves
- Posts: 16097
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 6:18 pm
- Location: At the start of a glorious era.
Re: THE WENGER THREAD
After that Oscars mix-up, I'm praying that we'll all find out later today that it was meant to be Wenger who was sacked not Ranieri.
-
- Posts: 4861
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 1:33 am
- Location: In a darkened room
Re: THE WENGER THREAD
Perryashburtongroves wrote:After that Oscars mix-up, I'm praying that we'll all find out later today that it was meant to be Wenger who was sacked not Ranieri.
