Clash wrote:sk-gtfo wrote:armchair wrote:
Even Wenger himself has revealed Gazidis' frustration with him over using the resources he has available. Gazidis wanting to actually improve tha squad and Wenger holding him back.
Fucking arsehole.
But yea let the AKB's and apologists divert the blame onto Kroenke with the "no money, his hands are tied" argument. Its Wenger holding us back with his penny-pinching, dithering and incompetence.
http://arsenal.news/news/arsene-wenger- ... ew-players
Yet again you miss the glaringly obvious point - Kroenke employs Wenger and has seen fit to award Wenger's failures with new contracts each time. Shifting the blame onto Kroenke nope, Wenger and Kroenke are basically one and the same thing.
I have no reason to claim that what you say about Kroenke isn't completely right ... but Wenger was like he is now
before Kroenke arrived.
In other words we have seen what a hindrance Wenger is without Kroenke ... we haven't yet seen how much of a hindrance Kroeknke is without Wenger. For me this makes Wenger the bigger problem at the club ...
I agree with the above. While I'm by no means a Kroenke fan, and his willingness to stand by Wenger is driving me insane, under normal circumstances (i.e. a shit manager not being able to blag fourth every year no matter what), I don't mind the fact that he stays the fuck out of the football club.
You only have to look at the likes of Blackburn, Newcastle, Hull, Cardiff, Aston Villa, Liverpool and so on to see the problems a hands-on owner can cause. Even Man Utd were plunged into debt with the Glazier's, but that's an aside.
Kroenke hasn't tried changing the club's name, our shirt colour, isn't dictating who we should sign, doesn't make himself the face of the club/brand, and generally stays the fuck out of it. If this were the Wenger of 1996-2006, then this would be an ideal scenario, because you don't want the owner sticking his beak in.
The problem is, we're in a rare situation where we have a manager that is failing in one regard (football matters) but succeeding in others (financial matters). Once Wenger eventually goes, this problem will ease. We'll have a manager that either has us competing at the top, pleasing both fan and owner; or we'll have one who's falling short, dissatisfying both fan and owner. The problem is that we have a manager who intentionally plans to finish fourth season after season after season, and that's why there's such division among the fanbase. Some see this as success (the club is making money and competing in the CL), the rest of us see it as failure (we're a football club, not a business).
So all I'm saying is that when we move on to a new manager, lightning won't strike twice. You'd be hard pressed to find another manager content to aim for fourth every year, and if we did, I can't see him having a 20+ year "success rate" a la Wenger. The new manager's successes or
failings will be more identifiable, and the board and fans will probably have more closely aligned opinions.
Ironic really that Wenger himself is the "special circumstance".