THE WENGER THREAD

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
User avatar
Arsenal Till I Die
Posts: 5275
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 6:06 pm
Location: North London

Re: THE WENGER THREAD

Post by Arsenal Till I Die »

Allgunsblazin wrote:
Tue Feb 27, 2018 7:59 pm
Arsenal Till I Die wrote:
Tue Feb 27, 2018 7:52 pm
I read somewhere Josh Kroenke doesn't like Wenger. I don't know if that's true or not?
No one likes Joshbag either!.... :wink:
He'll be my new favourite person if he sacks Wenger! :barscarf:

User avatar
NickF
Posts: 1628
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 9:00 am

Re: THE WENGER THREAD

Post by NickF »

sk-gtfo wrote:
Tue Feb 27, 2018 7:48 pm

The end game is in sight now, Wenger has run out of get out of jail cards and the players he has have neither the motivation nor in many cases the quality to get him out of trouble anyway.
We were in exactly the same place last season, around the West Brom away game, where the players were not playing for him anymore.
Unfortunately, as much as I would love him to go at the end of the season, I just can't see it happening. He isn't going to quit and I can't see him being sacked, out of respect to him :roll: .

There is also no appetite from our matchday fans to get rid of him, so I believe he is here until at least the end of next season.

User avatar
StuartL
Posts: 7878
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 8:22 pm
Location: It’s a new dawn, a new day a new life, for me and I’m feeling good

Re: THE WENGER THREAD

Post by StuartL »

Arsenal Till I Die wrote:
Tue Feb 27, 2018 7:52 pm
I read somewhere Josh Kroenke doesn't like Wenger. I don't know if that's true or not?
He was supposebly (joeyism ) in Ivan’s corner in the summer “catalyst for change” which ended up with Wenker getting 2 more years :roll:

User avatar
sk-gtfo
Posts: 1962
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2017 4:59 pm
Location: Staying away

Re: THE WENGER THREAD

Post by sk-gtfo »

NickF wrote:
Tue Feb 27, 2018 9:33 pm
We were in exactly the same place last season, around the West Brom away game, where the players were not playing for him anymore.
Unfortunately, as much as I would love him to go at the end of the season, I just can't see it happening. He isn't going to quit and I can't see him being sacked, out of respect to him :roll: .

There is also no appetite from our matchday fans to get rid of him, so I believe he is here until at least the end of next season.
The difference now is it is obvious we are likely out of the CL for the forseeable future (under Wenger), I think Kroenke naively bought Wenger's nonsense about being able to "re-invent himself", although the failure of that to materialise alone is probably not enough to convince wiggy w*nker to end things I think the brand damage that is being done now is likely to be enough, nothing to do with the fans directly, but the empty seats are becoming a running joke and the negativity surrounding the club has been bad enough this season, another season under Wenger would be very damaging for the brand.

We all know Kroenke is only in it for the money so it stands to reason that money will be the downfall of Wenger, in some ways I'd like to see him stay actually because that would make Kroenke look bad and would be quite amusing, plus I don't expect us to appoint anyone that great as Wenger's replacement anyway, the more that wiggy c*nt damages his investment the more likely he is to sell up and piss off.

:twisted:

User avatar
Midz
Posts: 5724
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 6:36 pm
Location: West London.

Re: THE WENGER THREAD

Post by Midz »

Arsenal Till I Die wrote:
Tue Feb 27, 2018 7:52 pm
I read somewhere Josh Kroenke doesn't like Wenger. I don't know if that's true or not?
I read that everyday here :D

User avatar
Nos89
Posts: 4568
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:44 am

Re: THE WENGER THREAD

Post by Nos89 »

Just to say, Arsenal do not owe Wenger anything. He's been well renumerated for "turning down the world". Had he left for Madrid in 2007 he'd have been out of work for the last 7 years.

User avatar
foxinthebox2001
Posts: 704
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:24 am
Location: Beyond the Wall.

Re: THE WENGER THREAD

Post by foxinthebox2001 »

If nothing else its good to see the press corps finally really getting on his case, instead of blowing smoke up his arse.
Even better, he is getting prickly at the questions and comments he faces.
Also makes a change from the press deriding the ungrateful Arsenal fans protests against him.
Its the beginning of the end for him, and I personally cant wait to hear him attempt to defend himself on Friday, if we get another drubbing from City.
Maybe someone could ask him who exactly are these clubs that were desperate to crowbar him out of Arsenal.

User avatar
TeeCee
Posts: 9951
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:26 pm
Location: On the Cusp in SW France

Re: THE WENGER THREAD

Post by TeeCee »

‘I turned down the world’!!!

Fucking narcissistic prick! Everyone should love me, I MADE ARSENE FC!!! :cussing:

User avatar
Midz
Posts: 5724
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 6:36 pm
Location: West London.

Re: THE WENGER THREAD

Post by Midz »

"People who comment, their job is to comment. What is important is how we respond - analyse well and respond together in a united way."

But you don't analyse or respond to the same mistakes you've been making for the last 10 years, Arsene.

beck
Posts: 595
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:19 am

Re: THE WENGER THREAD

Post by beck »

supergeorgegraham wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:33 am
I think every Arsenal fan is now saying what was the point in moving to the Emirates. We had a much better team at Highbury and all the reasons we moved in the first place have been forgotten.
If your club is making money then it has to go on good players. We only spent 7 million in both windows because we sold players.
Mustafi and Xhaka are terrible signings and Lacazette is not looking too good either. Maybe a new manager can improve performance but this a very poor Arsenal team. Worse one under Wenger and it's been bad for a while.
I ain't
I'm glad we moved to the Emirates
We had outgrown Highbury and moved to a bigger stadium in our heartland
The problem is Wenger
Not having a contingency plan 10 years ago is the problem
When it became clear in October 2011 that Wenger was unable to improve
The champions league winning player and double winner in English football ancelotti should have been installed straight away
He didn't want to leave london
We had Italian speaking Brady to bridge the gap and show arsenal values as a number 2
It was a no brainier
I would still have him for the next few years
A young vibrant coach with fresh ideas can be identified to take over then
Mind you if we went for that option straight away I would be equally has happy
Just want Wenger gone

beck
Posts: 595
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:19 am

Re: THE WENGER THREAD

Post by beck »

GTG wrote:
Tue Feb 27, 2018 7:16 am
I'm genuinely not fussed who comes in as long as it's someone. Let's be frank we don't trust the board to get it right and theres one thing for sure.... If they get it wrong there won't be anything like the same patience shown to Wenger so the new man would be gone and the board have another crack.

This process may take 10 years before we get back to where we should be but at least there will be hope and change.

Right now that would do me.
Hear hear
And that's why I want hack at the neck of anybody saying carefull what you wish for
You ain't married to a manager for 22 years
You have a punt
You get it wrong
You go again
It's the inactivity where the fault lies
That is where this differs from those grim mid 70's
You got the feeling the club were doing their best to be the best they could be

beck
Posts: 595
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:19 am

Re: THE WENGER THREAD

Post by beck »

Bob Bayliss wrote:
Tue Feb 27, 2018 7:40 am
robbo10 wrote:
Tue Feb 27, 2018 7:21 am
markyp wrote:
Tue Feb 27, 2018 7:00 am
Gunnersaurus wrote:
Tue Feb 27, 2018 5:18 am
mcdowell42 wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 11:36 pm
Brendan Rogers is on the list according to John Cross in the Mirror and Daily Mail reporting same thing.
He's just trying to create a be careful what you wish for story, no way will Rodgers be on the list.
id take Buck Rogers over wenger let alone Brendan
I'd have Kenny Rogers.............with Dolly Parton as his number 2. :barscarf:
I'd take Ginger Rogers.....at least she'd coach Mustafi to dance gracefully out of the way of a dropping ball

Or maybe Clodagh Rodgers......she'd get Jack in the box
I would take Peter Rogers
Got to be better than this carry on

arrgee
Posts: 787
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:16 pm

Re: THE WENGER THREAD

Post by arrgee »

beck wrote:
Wed Feb 28, 2018 11:39 am
supergeorgegraham wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:33 am
I think every Arsenal fan is now saying what was the point in moving to the Emirates. We had a much better team at Highbury and all the reasons we moved in the first place have been forgotten.
I ain't
I'm glad we moved to the Emirates
We had outgrown Highbury and moved to a bigger stadium in our heartland
The problem is Wenger
Not having a contingency plan 10 years ago is the problem
When it became clear in October 2011 that Wenger was unable to improve
Ever since Kronke took control in April 2011 the reasons for moving have been forgotten. Whereas it may well have been the intention to challenge for the European Cup with the bigger stadium back in 2006, that ambition was replaced with the more pragmatic let's make lots of money. Selling Fabregas was the proof of that along with the subsequent 2-8 at Old Toilet and the bargain basement rush on the last day of the transfer window. Wenger would have gone at that point if the owner had serious ambition.

Even when they had a glimmer of hope of winning the league in 2016, only Elneny joined in the January transfer window.

Gunner Rob
Posts: 9793
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 3:05 pm

Re: THE WENGER THREAD

Post by Gunner Rob »

TeeCee wrote:
Wed Feb 28, 2018 10:48 am
‘I turned down the world’!!!

Fucking narcissistic prick! Everyone should love me, I MADE ARSENE FC!!! :cussing:
yeah about FIFTEEN YEARS AGO he maybe turned down Real Madrid.

thats like Paul Gascoigne coming out and saying that he turned down the opportunity to join us last summer :roll:

User avatar
augie
Posts: 30878
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: THE WENGER THREAD

Post by augie »

arrgee wrote:
Wed Feb 28, 2018 12:02 pm
beck wrote:
Wed Feb 28, 2018 11:39 am
supergeorgegraham wrote:
Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:33 am
I think every Arsenal fan is now saying what was the point in moving to the Emirates. We had a much better team at Highbury and all the reasons we moved in the first place have been forgotten.
I ain't
I'm glad we moved to the Emirates
We had outgrown Highbury and moved to a bigger stadium in our heartland
The problem is Wenger
Not having a contingency plan 10 years ago is the problem
When it became clear in October 2011 that Wenger was unable to improve
Ever since Kronke took control in April 2011 the reasons for moving have been forgotten. Whereas it may well have been the intention to challenge for the European Cup with the bigger stadium back in 2006, that ambition was replaced with the more pragmatic let's make lots of money. Selling Fabregas was the proof of that along with the subsequent 2-8 at Old Toilet and the bargain basement rush on the last day of the transfer window. Wenger would have gone at that point if the owner had serious ambition.

Even when they had a glimmer of hope of winning the league in 2016, only Elneny joined in the January transfer window.




I would class myself as fairly tuned in when talking about the negative effect poor performances and half empty stadium will have on the club, but tbh I can never understand the argument that kroenke is making money from the club as it is - dont get me wrong cos I too feel that he is an absolute cancer in our club, but how or where is he making money ? :? The £3m consultancy fee thing seems to have stopped, and he wont pay dividends from the club to himself cos he would then have to pay usmanov, so surely he cant be making money in the here and now ? My reading of the situation is that continued profits will boost the share prices, but again he can only make money that way if he actually sells - if I'm right on that then he is either playing the long game hoping that usmanov will get pissed off and sell up, or he is building up the share price with a long term plan to sell in future

I could be reading that situation way wrong, and if so please people point out where I am wrong in my thinking

Post Reply