augie wrote: ↑Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:31 pm
DB10GOONER wrote: ↑Tue Nov 13, 2018 5:15 pm
augie wrote: ↑Tue Nov 13, 2018 9:32 am
I have to say that out of all the players on that list, bellend is the only one I would keep cos I believe that he can still be moulded. Xhaka, iwobi and mustafi not good enough, monreal too old and now becoming injury prone, and ozil ............. god himself couldnt mould his attitude cos he thinks that he is above that

I still believe that the mis-use of arshavin ranks as one of the most shocking tactical fcuk ups and disappointments of the last decade, but the failure of ozil to set the world alight for us on a consistant basis is not far behind. Talent is beyond question, but that only makes it worse
Now I'm sure you will correct me if I'm wrong here
But this post and a few others you put on here imply that you view AA23's failure as Wenger's fault but Ozil's failure to "set the world alight" is his own fault?
I'm on record with not agreeing with this idea that Ozil has somehow "failed" since he arrived. It's a myth. Like the "he never delivers against the top 6 teams" horseshit that some idiots pop out whilst happily ignoring the fact that NONE of our players deliver against the top 6 teams and haven't done since long before Ozil's arrival and also ignoring the fact that during most of those games against the top 6 Ozil was still our best player.
We have to see what Ozil can do under the new manager. It might take some time for the system to work out. But for me every player starts with a clean slate this season. Even Comedy Iwobi.
I suppose that judging failure is all about perception and standards isnt it ?
When you have a world class player like ozil, you expect him to be the fulcrum of a team (especially one as bad as ours has been
), and when he has rarely met those expectations, I think that it is fair enough to class him as a failure. Ozil has been given the freedom to do what he wanted under the previous dickhead manager, and even that didnt bring out the best of him. Arshavin however was marooned out onto the wing by a gormless senile old b.stard and it never allowed him to fulfill his potential with us. Could he have been our main man in those teams ? We will never know that for sure, but I suspect that he would have been more influencial than ozil if he had of been allowed the freedom that ozil had.
I still believe that ozil could become a highly influencial/key player for us IF he is played in the 10 behind a 2 man strikeforce. I agree the system is a work in progress, and it will remain a work in progress until dick gets at least 2 more transfer windows to get his own type of players in. In the meantime though, I expect to see players (like ozil and bangabang) working their arses off and buying into the team ethos instead of sulking when subbed
Btw I dont agree that ALL players get a clean slate - some players (mustafi for example) are shit and will never be any better, so it is a waste of time giving him a fresh start. Some players you know just arent good enough regardless of who is the manager
Whilst i agree in principle with the above there is one point that everyone ignores, Ozil's ability is not in doubt however his elevating to world class player was in many ways was based around the higher class of player he was playing with at that point, personal skill and ability can only take you so far, everything else depends on those around you and if they are not producing and providing there is a limit to what a player can do.
Ozil is far from blameless, his attitude stinks a lot of the time but look back to the season when Giroud went dry for 15-16 games in a row, Ozil was still creating the chances but he lost out on what should have been a dead cert assists record because the striker couldn't hit a barn door for almost half a season.
Going back to Dick, some of you are either being obtuse or deliberately missing the point, yes there is only so much the manager can do with the players individually and about their ability but our main problem at the moment is not really tactical or skill based it is organisational and motivational and that is dead centre in the coaches area of responsibility, do any coaching course at any level and that is one of the things drummed into you.
For whatever reason Dick is struggling to get his message across to the players for the first half of the majority of matches, but when he pulls them in at half time in the majority of games we've turned poor first half performances into very good second half performances, it worries me that after nearly 20 games he is still not getting the message across before kick off or they are not responding. He should be able to assess his pre-match talks against his second half ones and resolve this.
Hopefully as i said before he'll resolve this quickly but i just find it odd the difference in 1st and 2nd half performances is so marked and yet barring the Victims match it is allowed to continue match after match. Either he is not realising and coaching it out of them or he does not see a problem, either way it is worrying.
Benefit of the doubt still stands because when we've been good we've been very good but it is caveated that eventually if things dont change we're going to take a pasting and the bubble will burst and i'm not looking forward to the deflated feeling as the inevitability of it builds, we can only ride our luck so long and we have one of our most important matches of the season soon and i want to beat those swamp dwelling *word censored*!!