FFS. Don't give them ideas.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Give it twenty minutes and those cûnts will have 200,000 signatures on a petition demanding a government inquiry, they'll be boycotting everything in the entire world and lighting fucking candles every two seconds. And probably murdering Juventus supporters, mugging their own fans, idolising racists and cashing dead men's giros. Because that's what they do.HerbertChapman wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2020 6:48 pmhttps://southendnewsnetwork.net/news/li ... 1cG9lDas7g
FFS. Don't give them ideas.![]()
Would also be funny if it wasnt Man United benefiting.northbank123 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2020 9:24 pmEven better - Chelsea goal disallowed because Fred pushed Azpilicueta into Williams. Couldn’t make this up.
Would be annoying if it wasn’t Chelsea getting shafted.
If Barry the mole was responsible for the still hilarious sight of Slippy G singlehandedly shitting on his own legacy and losing the league for the victims then Barry the fucking mole should get a Nobel prize for services to humanity.Perryashburtongroves wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2020 8:27 pmGive it twenty minutes and those cûnts will have 200,000 signatures on a petition demanding a government inquiry, they'll be boycotting everything in the entire world and lighting fucking candles every two seconds. And probably murdering Juventus supporters, mugging their own fans, idolising racists and cashing dead men's giros. Because that's what they do.HerbertChapman wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2020 6:48 pmhttps://southendnewsnetwork.net/news/li ... 1cG9lDas7g
FFS. Don't give them ideas.![]()
A few of my Scouse supporting mates reckon that Stevie G's slip didn't cost them the title, it was Brendan's tactics that day that pushed poor Stevie overDB10GOONER wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 6:54 amIf Barry the mole was responsible for the still hilarious sight of Slippy G singlehandedly shitting on his own legacy and losing the league for the victims then Barry the fucking mole should get a Nobel prize for services to humanity.Perryashburtongroves wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2020 8:27 pmGive it twenty minutes and those cûnts will have 200,000 signatures on a petition demanding a government inquiry, they'll be boycotting everything in the entire world and lighting fucking candles every two seconds. And probably murdering Juventus supporters, mugging their own fans, idolising racists and cashing dead men's giros. Because that's what they do.HerbertChapman wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2020 6:48 pmhttps://southendnewsnetwork.net/news/li ... 1cG9lDas7g
FFS. Don't give them ideas.![]()
![]()
IW8Goalmachine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 11:29 amA few of my Scouse supporting mates reckon that Stevie G's slip didn't cost them the title, it was Brendan's tactics that day that pushed poor Stevie overDB10GOONER wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 6:54 amIf Barry the mole was responsible for the still hilarious sight of Slippy G singlehandedly shitting on his own legacy and losing the league for the victims then Barry the fucking mole should get a Nobel prize for services to humanity.Perryashburtongroves wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2020 8:27 pmGive it twenty minutes and those cûnts will have 200,000 signatures on a petition demanding a government inquiry, they'll be boycotting everything in the entire world and lighting fucking candles every two seconds. And probably murdering Juventus supporters, mugging their own fans, idolising racists and cashing dead men's giros. Because that's what they do.HerbertChapman wrote: ↑Mon Feb 17, 2020 6:48 pmhttps://southendnewsnetwork.net/news/li ... 1cG9lDas7g
FFS. Don't give them ideas.![]()
![]()
Jock Gooner wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 2:10 pmWell contrary to popular belief it would appear that TOF still has one brain cell rattling about upstairs. He is proposing to do the obvious and rewrite the offside law for next season so that an attacker is onside as long as any part of the body that he can score with () is level with the defender. If we are lumbered with VAR then this is a step forward at least and will make the cu.nt referees in the PL put their slide rules away. No more offside armpits or big toes
![]()
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football ... fside-var/
Clash wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 2:17 pmJock Gooner wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 2:10 pmWell contrary to popular belief it would appear that TOF still has one brain cell rattling about upstairs. He is proposing to do the obvious and rewrite the offside law for next season so that an attacker is onside as long as any part of the body that he can score with () is level with the defender. If we are lumbered with VAR then this is a step forward at least and will make the cu.nt referees in the PL put their slide rules away. No more offside armpits or big toes
![]()
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football ... fside-var/![]()
It would be an improvement but wont it instead be a case of the slide rule coming out to prove someone is onside instead of offside?
Maybe we should have kept Iwobi. Part of that massive backside would be onside at all times wherever he is on the pitch![]()
Yep exactly. It will just be swapping the farthest forward part of the body to the farthest back. So it would be his armpit is onside instead of his armpit is offside. Can't see any improvement gained from it myself.Clash wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 2:17 pmJock Gooner wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 2:10 pmWell contrary to popular belief it would appear that TOF still has one brain cell rattling about upstairs. He is proposing to do the obvious and rewrite the offside law for next season so that an attacker is onside as long as any part of the body that he can score with () is level with the defender. If we are lumbered with VAR then this is a step forward at least and will make the cu.nt referees in the PL put their slide rules away. No more offside armpits or big toes
![]()
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football ... fside-var/![]()
It would be an improvement but wont it instead be a case of the slide rule coming out to prove someone is onside instead of offside?
Maybe we should have kept Iwobi. Part of that massive backside would be onside at all times wherever he is on the pitch![]()
HerbertChapman wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 2:37 pmYep exactly. It will just be swapping the farthest forward part of the body to the farthest back. So it would be his armpit is onside instead of his armpit is offside. Can't see any improvement gained from it myself.Clash wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 2:17 pmJock Gooner wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 2:10 pmWell contrary to popular belief it would appear that TOF still has one brain cell rattling about upstairs. He is proposing to do the obvious and rewrite the offside law for next season so that an attacker is onside as long as any part of the body that he can score with () is level with the defender. If we are lumbered with VAR then this is a step forward at least and will make the cu.nt referees in the PL put their slide rules away. No more offside armpits or big toes
![]()
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football ... fside-var/![]()
It would be an improvement but wont it instead be a case of the slide rule coming out to prove someone is onside instead of offside?
Maybe we should have kept Iwobi. Part of that massive backside would be onside at all times wherever he is on the pitch![]()
Er.....I'm referring to the VAR officials drawing their little lines on the screen.Jock Gooner wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 2:59 pmHerbertChapman wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 2:37 pmYep exactly. It will just be swapping the farthest forward part of the body to the farthest back. So it would be his armpit is onside instead of his armpit is offside. Can't see any improvement gained from it myself.Clash wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 2:17 pmJock Gooner wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 2:10 pmWell contrary to popular belief it would appear that TOF still has one brain cell rattling about upstairs. He is proposing to do the obvious and rewrite the offside law for next season so that an attacker is onside as long as any part of the body that he can score with () is level with the defender. If we are lumbered with VAR then this is a step forward at least and will make the cu.nt referees in the PL put their slide rules away. No more offside armpits or big toes
![]()
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football ... fside-var/![]()
It would be an improvement but wont it instead be a case of the slide rule coming out to prove someone is onside instead of offside?
Maybe we should have kept Iwobi. Part of that massive backside would be onside at all times wherever he is on the pitch![]()
Er.....it's a goal![]()
HerbertChapman wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 4:29 pmEr.....I'm referring to the VAR officials drawing their little lines on the screen.Jock Gooner wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 2:59 pmHerbertChapman wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 2:37 pmYep exactly. It will just be swapping the farthest forward part of the body to the farthest back. So it would be his armpit is onside instead of his armpit is offside. Can't see any improvement gained from it myself.Clash wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 2:17 pmJock Gooner wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 2:10 pmWell contrary to popular belief it would appear that TOF still has one brain cell rattling about upstairs. He is proposing to do the obvious and rewrite the offside law for next season so that an attacker is onside as long as any part of the body that he can score with () is level with the defender. If we are lumbered with VAR then this is a step forward at least and will make the cu.nt referees in the PL put their slide rules away. No more offside armpits or big toes
![]()
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football ... fside-var/![]()
It would be an improvement but wont it instead be a case of the slide rule coming out to prove someone is onside instead of offside?
Maybe we should have kept Iwobi. Part of that massive backside would be onside at all times wherever he is on the pitch![]()
Er.....it's a goal![]()
![]()