The thing none of us know for sure is what happened and who is to blame for the January debacle? If, as you suggest, Arteta did make an SOS call and went to the board with specific targets that weren't realised for whatever reason, then for sure Wiggy and Son need to cop a lot of flak. However, when they did provide funds back in the Summer, one has to question why Merino and Calafiori were prioritised as signings......so it looks to me like there is a collective failure here. The loan signings of Neto and Sterling were nothing short of farcical too and meant that by January we didn't even have a loan option available to us, so even if the likes of Rashford were a potential solution, that door was closed by the total ineffectiveness of the previous window's signings.General wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2025 11:09 amEverything you’ve written confirms the historical lack of aggression and ambition at board level. The current owners are simply continuing this tradition, so I don’t know how you can turn around and call for Arteta’s head. He made an SOS call in January which fell on depth ears. This is not to say Arteta is blameless but it would take a superhuman effort from the most experienced of managers to drag this lot anywhere near close to the title without significant reinforcements.Retro Gunner wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2025 5:15 pmRetro Gunner wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2025 4:03 pmI made the very point that SteveO is making about the DNA of the club quite a few months ago. It hasn’t been any different for my entire lifetime and as I said before, my dad who died a couple of years ago at age 99 (so had plenty of time to witness it), would always say that the club had always been tight fisted regarding transfers. He would relate the story of us trying to sign Danny Blanchflower from Villa for a whole summer and the manager had to keep going back to the board to ask for more money. At the eleventh hour spurs walked up and paid the asking price and he was the captain that led them to the double.
We never seem to buy top players who are at the top of their game (Alan Ball was an exception, but sadly joined a team in decline) and I think most of us would say that Dennis was the best player we’ve ever signed, but even he was in a trough at Inter and was therefore relatively cheap….same goes for Henry. We normally buy prospects, many of whom go on to be cracking players, but there’s a great many who don’t and bring youngsters through. Most players we sign are upper second tier at best and we frequently over pay for them. To be honest, I’ve always thought that the very top players wont join us because we don’t compete at the top level.
The top clubs throughout Europe buy the proven best. I’m afraid we don’t have a top club mindset and in European teams, we also come up short against the second tier clubs.
Hate to say it, but we need a new manager and a fresh start, because Arteta peaked last season and won’t come back from the point we’ve now sunk to. I’m also wondering whether the players have stopped believing in Arteta and “the process”.
Previously I didn’t think that the Kroenke’s would be prepared to bankroll the transfers and wages required, but now I’m not so sure, because they’ve definitely indulged Legohead. Fuck knows.
Just re-read this. I'm afraid it was a bit of a ramble, a stream of consciousness....or something like that.![]()
I'm just seriously pissed off. Don't think I can face the whole Wenger managed decline shit again.![]()
I don't think Arteta is solely to blame here, any more than I did with Wenger. If we want to bring Emery into the picture too then its very clear he was neither given the time or resources to even have half a chance of success, so this history of failing to achive progress is etched in our history through the decades. What were the real reasons for Edu moving on, when it seemed he was part of something that was moving in the right direction? Was it a pure money call, or did he see some sort of lack of ambition as a reason?
It strikes me that the only 2 managers who have raged against the machine successfully in the past 50 years were Wenger and Graham, and even then both of their reigns end badly. Fiszman and Dein were both cited as integral to the success of the club in that period, neither of whom are here now. Were those 2 both head and shoulders above the other managers that have walked through the club over those decades or did they have better support from above at the time? Is it any coincidence that Wenger never hit the same heights of his early days once Dein was gone? Interesting to hear people's views here. I was only a 9 year old lad when Brady left so my memories get better from the mid 80s onwards from my teen years upwards