Wright bang out of order to use Rocky in this way (31/7)

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
User avatar
I Hate Hleb
Posts: 18632
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 3:36 pm
Location: London

Post by I Hate Hleb »

marcus_tandy wrote:I wrote an article for The Gooner a few years back saying that whilst Wright was a great player he was never an Arsenal legend in my eyes. I got a lot of stick for it but I think I had a good point.

The main reason I gave (amongst a lot of others) was the whole Benfica incident, which Wright apologists seem to forget. I'll never forget his interview on MOTD, with his stupid floppy hat, as he moaned that we wouldn't let him speak to Benfica for a transfer. This was a couple of months after breaking the goalscoring record! How quickly he forgot. Yet four months on when we've won the league he hangs out the dressing room window like he is Mr. Arsenal who has single handedly won it for us. The guy has no class.

And to use Rocky's name in this way is pathetic. I can put up with his rubbish Sun column saying whatever he likes, but the minute he starts using a real Arsenal legend to make his cheap points then he has gone too far.

What a fool that man is. Though I do quite like him on new 'Gladiators'.
Can't you see the irony in what you wrote there, Marcus? :roll: :roll: :lol: :wink:

marcus_tandy
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 2:33 pm

Post by marcus_tandy »

I can't really see the irony, because for me to be a legend you also have to be more than a great player. There is no doubt that Ian Wright is the greatest goal scorer I have ever seen play for Arsenal. He is even better than Henry in that respect.

What stops him being a Bergkamp, an Adams, a Winterburn etc is his lack of class, and him being 'Mr Arsenal' when it suits. Don't get me wrong nobody is perfect, Adams has made some weird comments about us since he left for example. But he never went on national TV and practically demanded a transfer (a la Wright). And don't forget that Wright also wanted out under Rioch's reign too.

Ian Wright is always about Ian Wright. At a testimonial he has no trouble trying to get all the plaudits away from whose match it is. I also have some Palace supporting mates who say he has the same irritating act there. And don't forget that when he goes back to Palace he always wheels out the "how Palace will always be my number one club" rot, and then he says the same thing when he comes trundling back to us.

But I'm getting off the point. If you call someone a legend just because of their ability then that's fine. For me though it's also about what you give the club and what that club really means to you. The lines can become blurred of course. O'Leary for example is a legend to me, despite the twerp he has been since he left. That's because he did enough over the years to still edge legend status. Wright though is too self centered, too egotistical, very unloyal and now a prize idiot to boot. How he has used Rocky in his crappy ghostwritten column says all you need to know about the man. He should stick to lusting after (the actually rather lovely) Tempest on Gladiators.

User avatar
REB
Posts: 23439
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:40 pm
Location: meh

Post by REB »

ian wright never thought before he spoke as a player and now to keep himself in the light he's the same :roll:
shame for using rocky as a stick to beat the club but he is only saying what people think, right or wrong

1979gooner
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 6:18 pm

agree

Post by 1979gooner »

I agree very much with marcus and others.

Why should we continue to respect the likes of Ian Wright when he shows respect for no one but himself?

I got some criticism on my blog for slating Ian Wright, some saying I should be more 'loyal' and show more 'respect'.

I disagree with this, respect is a two way thing, Wright has none for anyone but himself, so he's getting none back.

cheers


http://anotherarsenalblog.blogspot.com

80s Gooner
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:23 pm

Post by 80s Gooner »

I hate Helb!
As someone who attended every home game (and quite a few away games) from 82-94. I think that I'm entitled to my opinion sunshine.
After the 91 season when we only lost one game all season. You would have expected us to go on and dominate the 90's just as Man u did.
I do not blame Wright for that. GG, Limpars dramatic loss of form,Merson & Adams drinking habits did not help either.
You seem to forget that Kevin Campbell and Andy Cole banged in over 50 goals between them for the reserves. Towards the back end of the 91 season Campbell began to live up to his potential (remember the the goals at home against Leeds).
You seem to think that Wright kept us up in the mid nineties, perhaps if we had kept hold of Cole then he would have done the same thing.
By signing Wright Arsenal changed thier game. Campbell was played wide, Smith was used for knock ons and to hold up the ball.
Smith for me was a better player and a better man.
You can't argue with his goalscoring record, but he wasnt the best striker in the world. Anelka proved that, Ferdinand and Shearer proved it by keeping him out of the England team.
Wright lacks class, we all agree on that. Where as Lehman/Keown were dirty and as Arsenal fan you respect that, Wright was just plain nasty.
Sorry boys and girls that was just my opinion

User avatar
gooner.ed
Site Admin
Posts: 3458
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 3:05 pm
Location: Scotland Yard's 10 Most Wanted List

Post by gooner.ed »

and opinions are what this here forum is all about.

rolypoly
Posts: 644
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:52 am
Location: heaven

Post by rolypoly »

80s gooner

take comfort in the bread hater disagreeing with you as he generally writes total rubbish. you are pretty well on the mark.

the bread hater is an ignorant clueless idiot who does not even know he called himself the bread hater.

had wright stayed fit in 97-98 there aint no way would we have won the league but bread hater too moronic to have worked that out.

Jumpers For Goalposts
Posts: 2245
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:42 pm

Post by Jumpers For Goalposts »

I agree with 99% of the original article as I have never been able to respect Ian Wright as a person - his overall achievements at Arsenal are superb but it's very hard to like him. Marc Ollington wrote a good article about him a couple of years ago, saying what an annoying character he is.

I will never forget his ridiculous foul against PSG in the 1994 ECWC Semi Final, for which he recieved a yellow card putting him out of the final (which we won without him!). He was rampaging around like a twat on acid and never once did he consider what the team needed from him, preferring to play for himself. Also his abuse of the disabled linesman, and his Benfica statements are unforgivable.

A mate of mine called Neil regularly plays golf with Wrighty and says that he operates at 100mph all the time and it is impossible to shut him up but he can be very likeable when you get to know him.

I saw my mate late last year and we were discussing football - Neil told me that Wrighty was selling his house (Mansion!) in Shirley Hills, near Croydon. A quick look in the local property pages showed his stunning house up for sale at a cool £5million. Not bad when the average fan either can't get or can't afford a bloody mortgage!

No wonder he writes so many controversial newspaper columns when he's got to maintain a lifestyle like that!!

User avatar
I Hate Hleb
Posts: 18632
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 3:36 pm
Location: London

Post by I Hate Hleb »

Marcus,

Of course, you can decide for yourself who you want to consider a legend. However, the irony I was pin-pointing was the fact that you chose to highlight Wrighty's transfer demand rather than a couple of other, more serious issues with Wright that have been pointed out by other contributors. I mean even Tony Adams, probably our second best ever captain (behind Frank), considered joining Man Utd in the early 90's and made threats to leave Arsenal if he didn't get the money he felt he deserved - albeit not on telly. And we don't need to rehash other off-the- field problems he had whilst at the club. Yet no-one sensible would exclude him from a list of Arsenal legends. You admit that the lines can become blurred and it's a matter of degrees as well as personal tastes, I suppose.

Also, you have to remember that he probably knew he was coming towards the tail-end of his career and wouldn't feature much longer in Wenger's plans, so was probably looking for one final payday. I suppose that, in itself, shows a selfishness you talk about, but it's certainly something I could live with given the contribution he made to our club. Let's face it, how many of the players that have played for our great club really did care about it and us, the fans, beyond the money and glory they could get whilst working at Arsenal?

As I already indicated previously, his comments about Rocky were both inappropriate and wrong. I would like to think he'd realise that and maybe say/write something to that effect.

80's Gooner,
I Hate Hleb wrote:
...You're entitled to say you didn't like Wright's Rocky comments, the man himself and even that you didn't rate him as a player. But to start deminishing his reputation because Arsenal achieved success before he was even at the club is just plain ridiculous!!:


Where do I say that you're not entitled to your opinion, sunshine? Indeed the contrary is true. I then went on to explain in the next couple of paragraphs why I thought the opinion you had reached was ridiculous.

You then went on to claim in your last post that you didn't blame Wrighty for us not dominating the 90's, yet that is exactly what you did do:
80s Gooner wrote:..The week Arsenal signed Wright Arsenal put 6 past Austria Vienna and 5 past Sheffield Utd and if my memory serves me correct we top of the league and reigning league champions with the two of the best forwards of thier era (Smith and Merson) and two of the best striking prospects (Campbell and Andy Cole)
Cole never got a look in and Campbell went backwards, Smith never hit double figures again after Wrights arrival.
I always associate Wrights arrival with break up of the Thomas, Davis, Rocastle midfield, boring long ball football and mid table mediocraty..
Campbell and Cole may well have banged in all those goals in the reserves - and yes, I was aware of it, as I've been following Arsenal Home and Away since 1969 :roll: - but that was the reserves. Campbell in my opinion was never good enough for us and Cole although never getting a chance, was let go because of his attitude. Yes he scored tons of goals for Newcastle and Man Utd but was never as good as Wrighty.

I disagree with a lot of your comments further on in your last post but as you say - and this I always will agree with - you're entitled to your opinion. However, by the same token, I'm just as entitled to question it!!

And by the way, I never said we would have been relegated in the mid-90's without his goals. Someone else did. :oops: :roll:

And then we come to Rolypoly!! :duh: :banghead: :oops: :roll:

Now what can I say about you that hasn't already been said? :rubchin: Ah, fuck it!! It's enough to know that most people on here realise you're a bullshit artist and a complete and utter :awnker: to boot. :owned: :roll: :lol: :lol: :wink:

User avatar
GoonerJim
Posts: 683
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 5:46 pm
Location: London

Post by GoonerJim »

rolypoly wrote:80s gooner

take comfort in the bread hater disagreeing with you as he generally writes total rubbish. you are pretty well on the mark.

the bread hater is an ignorant clueless idiot who does not even know he called himself the bread hater.
had wright stayed fit in 97-98 there aint no way would we have won the league but bread hater too moronic to have worked that out.
whereas your just a *word censored* whos full of :horseshite:

User avatar
QuartzGooner
Posts: 14474
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 pm
Location: London

Post by QuartzGooner »

Roly, I cannot agree with you saying if Wright had been fit 97-98 we would not have won the league.

He would have got on the end of as many of Overmars and Parlour's passes as Anelka and Bergkamp did.


Wright conked out about November 1998 after a good start at West Ham, so I would go so far as to say that if Wright had been kept another four months we might well have won the league in 1999 too.

80s Gooner
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:23 pm

Post by 80s Gooner »

In the mid 80s we were good to watch. But lacked the the killer instinct.
Just take a butchers on 442 (ESPN)
Under Graham we only became boring after we lost to Benfica, which is not down to wright I agree. But up until that point there was nothing wrong with our attack. Personally I think GG took a bung when he signed Wrighty.
The week we signed Wright we put 6 past Austiria Vienna. Smith 4, Merson 1, Campbell 1, Then we put 5 past Sheffield utd Smith 2, Campbell 2 (remind me who got the other I think it was Groves)
How can you say Wright was better than Cole?
Campbell never played outisde thetop flight until the latter stages of his career.
Adams never put himself ahead of Arsenal. The man was a top class centre back and a leader. He was bound to attract attention, and if you read his autobiography you will find staying with Arsenal and not joining man u had fuck all to do with money.
And please don't patronse me agian just because my opinion differs from yours. Tosspot
I never liked wright, I know I'm in a minority but there you go.

80s Gooner
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:23 pm

Post by 80s Gooner »

Sorry about the spelling mistakes in my last post. Also sorry about the tosspot remark.
I only glimpsed at your response IHH.
A measured and itelligent response.
But you see. I'm a what if merchant. Wenger to me is the ultimate under achiever. We should have won back to back doubles in 1998-99 and 2002-03 as well as winning 3 consequtive fa cups 2001-03.
Just as I feel that GG should have allowed the Smith/Campbell partnership to develope and then introduce Cole in the mid 90's after a period on loan and instead of of splashing out 2 million on Wright he should have bought a top quality midfielder

User avatar
g88ner
Posts: 14693
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:17 pm

Post by g88ner »

80s Gooner wrote:Sorry about the spelling mistakes in my last post. Also sorry about the tosspot remark.
I only glimpsed at your response IHH.
A measured and itelligent response.
But you see. I'm a what if merchant. Wenger to me is the ultimate under achiever. We should have won back to back doubles in 1998-99 and 2002-03 as well as winning 3 consequtive fa cups 2001-03.
Just as I feel that GG should have allowed the Smith/Campbell partnership to develope and then introduce Cole in the mid 90's after a period on loan and instead of of splashing out 2 million on Wright he should have bought a top quality midfielder
Welcome to the forum fella 8)

What I find odd, is that you seem to be going out of your way to be controversial..maybe you're trying to forge yourself a roylpoly-esque reputation? :roll: :lol:

How on earth can you think that Wenger is the "ultimate under achiever"?? :shock: Since Wenger arrived in 1996, we have won the league 3 times and the FA Cup 4 times. In fact, only ManUre have been more successful than Arsenal since Wenger arrived!

If you think Wenger should have won more, then fair enough, but to say that Wenger's the ultimate under achiever, is unfair. I agree that perhaps a league title or 2 more could have been possible..but lets not forget that it was the world's biggest team, ManU, and the World's richest team, Chelsea, that prevented us from back-to-back titles.

You must have noticed that we are spending far far less every summer, than our rivals? that's because we have to! our transfer and wage structure isn't there for no reason...it's essential. We can't buy world stars like ManUre, Chelsea and Liverpool, and yet, year in, year out, we're competing with them! that is not underachieving..that's over achieving! that's swimming against the tide. Please give Wenger just a little credit.

Every season, we're competing with arguably the biggest football club in the World, ManUtd, as well as the World's richest team, Chelsea, and the most successful club in English history, Liverpool. It's amazing that we've achieved so much, considering the competition and resources of our rivals.

Anyway, you've given your opinion, and I've given mine, and we're poles apart...and I'm not going to even bother questioning your opinions on Wrighty :lol:

80s Gooner
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:23 pm

Post by 80s Gooner »

98-99 we drew to many games that we dominated. 0-0 Charlton 0-0 Liverpool 1-1 amd lost we shouldn't have Leeds and Villa away and man u in the fa cup semi.
2002-03 we threw it away. Anyone remeber Wiltords shirt swapping antics at half time during the Bolton & Arsenal stupid defending a minute after taking the lead at home against man u which allowed to equalise.
Both of those seasons Arsenal were the best team in the league.
Last season Arsenal over achieved and were ultimately robbed by a lot of very poor refereeing decisions.
I'm not having a pop at Wenger. The best coach and the best football that as an Arsenal fan of 30 years plus I have had the pleasure to watch.
But I remember the baron years, who knows when we are going to win anything again.
Players like PV,DB and TH only come along once in a lifetime.
If you look at man u 's record over the last 10 years and then our record you can only shake your head and say we should have won more cause we we were better.
The memories were fantastic, for me the 2002 double team was the best Arsenal team ever.

Post Reply