SELLING THIS *word censored* EBOUE NOW
-
- Posts: 5491
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:06 pm
- Location: Aberystwyth
I thought Bendtner was quite good today. Had a bit of presence, gave Spurs some problems in defence and probably came closer than anyone than scoring.Chippy wrote:Why not "lazy players" and then you could have included Bendtner.
Song also had an alright game, even if he missed a sitter. Almunia's save at the end was top drawer.
- U.F.G Anfield '89
- Posts: 1712
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:26 pm
- Location: Royal Holloway University of London
if we had started anyone but eboue today those points were ours for the taking, spurs were shit. what does wenger see in eboue? is he his illegitimate son or something?
i have never booed an arsenal player in my life (sure i've shouted at them after errors etc.) but if he plays in an arsenal shirt again that will change.
i have never booed an arsenal player in my life (sure i've shouted at them after errors etc.) but if he plays in an arsenal shirt again that will change.
Yes Song had a good game but still he is not good enough to start the game (yet??!!). Denilson played ok today, but he must go as we have too many similar players in the squd. Though I am not a big fan of Ade, I think we need his height and sometimes (rarely) his strength to keep the ball in front. We can sell him only if we can find a replacement. That'sChunky Monkey wrote:I thought Song had a good game today & Denilson and are both good squad players to have at Arsenal
Eboue
Adebayor
Bentdner
all three have to go - see i put a white bloke in there in case i am called a racist

- U.F.G Anfield '89
- Posts: 1712
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:26 pm
- Location: Royal Holloway University of London
-
- Posts: 18459
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:19 pm
- Location: ireland
- U.F.G Anfield '89
- Posts: 1712
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:26 pm
- Location: Royal Holloway University of London
-
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:42 am
OK number 5 you stupid catholic. Does this show you how it might be offensive.Number 5 wrote:How can you be racist calling someone a lazy African? What if one of our African's scored a hat-trick and he was called and amazing African? The insult is in the lazy. Could apply to anyone. Not the African part.
![]()
![]()
Someone's race or religion is irrelevant to what they do or say in most cases so don't mention it unless it is relevant.
-
- Posts: 18459
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:19 pm
- Location: ireland
I think what Chippy means, is that if it's the LAZINESS that's the problem, why mention his nationality? - especially when, to my knowledge, Africans aren't known to be more lazy than Europeans or Asians.Number 5 wrote:How can you be racist calling someone a lazy African? What if one of our African's scored a hat-trick and he was called and amazing African? The insult is in the lazy. Could apply to anyone. Not the African part.
![]()
![]()
Do we then accept lazy Danes or Scots? - or is, as I suspect, the man point of the argument that we DON'T WANT LAZY PLAYERS FULL STOP!

Anyway, back to Eboue!

Last edited by g88ner on Sun Feb 08, 2009 3:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.