
AS FOR MY MATE HLEB - LET'S JUST SAY THAT HE WOULD HAVE BEEN HAPPY WITH HIS OWN PERFORMANCE HAD HE BEEN A GOLFER. WHY? BECAUSE THE GUY WAS WELL UNDER-PAR!!



Well you got one thing right, Magic, David James should have got a red, at least if the rules are applied strictly. (Personally, I think refs should try to keep all the players on the pitch, and I wasn't annoyed at James being let off.)Magic Hat wrote:Senderos was last man, it was a blatant foul and Kanu was 1-1 on one with Almunia, he had to go. James should have gone as well but the ref was awful,Portsmouth should have had a penalty when Senderos fouled Henderson or whatever their left back is called, Gilberto fouled one of their players in a great position with a tackle from behind but no freekick and we promptly countered as well as the things the ref got wrong against us.
There is no such thing as, the last man anymore, it's a red card offence if a player is deemed to have illegally prevented a goal-scoring opportunity regardless of the position of the other players around him, and even tho contact was very minimal and Kanu made an absolute meal of it, big Phil does look clumsy and is not the best at tryin to put an attacker off without actually fouling him, and we would probably have been screamin for it if it had been the other way around, whether or not we would've got it is another matter!26may1989 wrote: Yes, it was probably a foul on Kanu (though the contact was pretty minor), but Senderos was clearly not the last man. From that point on, the ref had no credibility in the game and lost control as a result. As was posted elsewhere, this is an obvious case for the card being retrospectively downgraded.
And I loved Kanu's goal, not quite as good as the one he got when we hammered Boro away a few years back, but good nonetheless.
The atmosphere seems better this year too, but that pigging Pompy bell was a pain in the arse today.
Since it was early on, he could have let James off with a booking but no cards? I watched the game on TV, guy tried to go around Senedros, he was brought to the ground and it really did look like Senderos did it deliberately, moving to get his body in the way to knock the Pompey player over.26may1989 wrote:
Well you got one thing right, Magic, David James should have got a red, at least if the rules are applied strictly. (Personally, I think refs should try to keep all the players on the pitch, and I wasn't annoyed at James being let off.)
But your calls on Senderos's red and Hreidersson's claim of an early foul are so off beam, are you sure you were at the game??
Yes, it was probably a foul on Kanu (though the contact was pretty minor), but Senderos was clearly not the last man. From that point on, the ref had no credibility in the game and lost control as a result. As was posted elsewhere, this is an obvious case for the card being retrospectively downgraded.
And the Hreidersson incident reminded me of Bobby Pires at his worst (i.e. that game against Pompy a few years ago) - Herman just fell over, there was no foul, end of.
There's no specific reference to the last man but under FIFA regs, in assessing whether a foul has denied an attacker an "obvious goalscoring opportunity" (i.e., the chance has to be not just a goalscoring opportunity but an obvious goalscoring oipportunity), the ref has to take a number of factors into account. These factors include "The location and number of defenders", which is equivalent to the last man.Belfast Boy wrote:There is no such thing as, the last man anymore, it's a red card offence if a player is deemed to have illegally prevented a goal-scoring opportunity regardless of the position of the other players around him, and even tho contact was very minimal and Kanu made an absolute meal of it, big Phil does look clumsy and is not the best at tryin to put an attacker off without actually fouling him, and we would probably have been screamin for it if it had been the other way around, whether or not we would've got it is another matter!
I don't know if you were sayin that tongue in cheek or not, but Kanu's goal was nothing more than a complete fluke!
Sorry, Magic, we agree on off the field stuff (about Dein, Usmanov, Fiszman etc) but seems we don't agree about the game itself. Which is nice.Magic Hat wrote:I watched the game on TV, guy tried to go around Senedros, he was brought to the ground and it really did look like Senderos did it deliberately, moving to get his body in the way to knock the Pompey player over.
IT WAS OBVIOUSLY YOU WHO WAS WATCHING A DIFFERENT GAME, MATEY!!Cesc is God wrote:You must have been watching a different game. Hleb was awesome - him and Tomas down the wing were fantastic!
Flamini was my MotM actually!
Elvis maybe your king but not mine! maybe in 20 years you might think Pete doc and Amy whinehouse as King and queen! I just think there junkies simple asgreen gooner wrote:I have to say how great it is to see Fabregas get better and better with every gameWe have a new king at the Grove, the king is dead, long live the king
![]()
Elvis was, and still is, thee kingYou are a great PR man for yourself One2smooth