Nasri or Arshavin?
- Yankee_Gooner_Dandee
- Posts: 2902
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:04 pm
- Location: Chicago, Illinois
Nasri or Arshavin?
It seems like this is going to be the question that Wenger is going to have to answer by Saturday. So who do you prefer of the two right now?
For me, love Nasri, but its gotta be Arshavin. I understand they both play out of position on the left and are both better suited coming inside to the middle behind the strikers, but Arshavin has that little bit extra that Nasri doesnt right now. He's quicker on and off the ball and gets himself at least a couple chances a game, whereas Nasri can disappear the whole game.
For me, love Nasri, but its gotta be Arshavin. I understand they both play out of position on the left and are both better suited coming inside to the middle behind the strikers, but Arshavin has that little bit extra that Nasri doesnt right now. He's quicker on and off the ball and gets himself at least a couple chances a game, whereas Nasri can disappear the whole game.
Re: Nasri or Arshavin?
Arshavin, for me! This guy is just a class.Yankee_Gooner_Dandee wrote:It seems like this is going to be the question that Wenger is going to have to answer by Saturday. So who do you prefer of the two right now?
For me, love Nasri, but its gotta be Arshavin. I understand they both play out of position on the left and are both better suited coming inside to the middle behind the strikers, but Arshavin has that little bit extra that Nasri doesnt right now. He's quicker on and off the ball and gets himself at least a couple chances a game, whereas Nasri can disappear the whole game.
- franksav63
- Posts: 14520
- Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:07 pm
- Location: Home - Whitechapel - Arsenal Block 6 - Twitter - @franksav63
- Contact:
Re: Nasri or Arshavin?
wlchuccc wrote:.Yankee_Gooner_Dandee wrote:It seems like this is going to be the question that Wenger is going to have to answer by Saturday. So who do you prefer of the two right now?
For me, love Nasri, but its gotta be Arshavin. I understand they both play out of position on the left and are both better suited coming inside to the middle behind the strikers, but Arshavin has that little bit extra that Nasri doesnt right now. He's quicker on and off the ball and gets himself at least a couple chances a game, whereas Nasri can disappear the whole game.
Arshavin, for me! This guy is just a class.
Also Arshavin, he has just that little bit more class than Nasri, he can spot and slot a pass from impropable angles, he is tough, he seems to bounce off players, he's also got an eye for goal. (it seems I'm downing Nasri, I'm not) but Arshavin is a different blend of Bisto (Gravy)
MM99 wrote:why does it have to an either/or choice? id play arshavin on the right and nasri on the left. then id use theo as a super sub when needed. dont think theo should be starting on saturday.
Agree I want to see Arshavin bamboozel, cuntly cole and make him look shit. Then when players are starting to feel tired chuck on theo and let him run at them.
Cashley Crunt the red cardn7gooner wrote:MM99 wrote:why does it have to an either/or choice? id play arshavin on the right and nasri on the left. then id use theo as a super sub when needed. dont think theo should be starting on saturday.
Agree I want to see Arshavin bamboozel, cuntly cole and make him look shit. Then when players are starting to feel tired chuck on theo and let him run at them.




-
- Posts: 4709
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 2:47 pm
- Location: Im just behind the bloke sitting in front of me.
Personally I would play both - I would play arshavin in the Bergkamp position behind the main striker which keeps him involved more and is far and away his best position and will utilise his skills more. I realise that will create a dilemma as to who would play up top with him cos imo rvp is not suited to the lone striker role but in a game like this you pick your best players in their best positions and that trumps everything else.
- piresistible
- Posts: 1020
- Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:36 am