SIGNED CHAMAKH!!!!!

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
mrgnu1958
Posts: 13369
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:32 pm
Location: ESSEX

Post by mrgnu1958 »

ok pi7es"y..but if wenger goes for sorenson over the likes of..Lloris,Buffon.Hartor Akinfeev,,THEN we will be fucked.

PI7ES
Posts: 735
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:38 am

Post by PI7ES »

I agree, i want wenger to spend money on quality. A world class keeper is our first priority in the summer, or it should be anyway.

User avatar
brazilianGOONER
Posts: 9208
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:27 am
Location: i think we're parked, man
Contact:

Post by brazilianGOONER »

PI7ES wrote:Which is exactly why wneger is bringing in chamakh, we have other areas that need strengthening more than a 30 mil striker, buying vila makes no sense when we need a keeper, another DM and a center half.
mate, villa is 28. will be until december.


but i agree with you, i think chamakh is enough. we desperatly need a keeper, and could do with an extra centre half and a cover for song

User avatar
12thGooner
Posts: 2398
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 8:27 am
Location: 103117114109111107104

Post by 12thGooner »

Its becoming a joke this who should we buy and for what positions.

Its clearly obvious we need a dedicated striker, anyone will fcuking do. Someone fit for most of the season is better than someone doing amazing for 6 games.

We clearly need a holding midfielder, song is doing better, but an alternative option would be good.

we obviously need a goalkeeper who is world class and worthy of the shirt , before we end up a shit team with second rate keepers,,... hang on....??

we need a left back, clichy is coming back, yes, but i think he's lost his edge, too many silly mistakes and he looks prper out of touch and everyone we play knows that.

gallas and vermalen need a fcuking smack round the face, they're fcuking defenders they should defend not going wondering off into the other half penalty area if they're not gonna leg it back when required.

a new manager / board... this is optional depending on your opinion on the matter.

User avatar
augie
Posts: 30984
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Post by augie »

PI7ES wrote:
augie wrote:Remember last summer there was another outstanding bordeaux player coming to the premiership ? Tosic came to manure with all the hype but within the space of 6 months he has been fcuked off to germany on loan :roll: Last summer when we were linked with this moroccan guy first it was discovered that his goals to games ratio was about 1 goal every 4 games in his career - hardly prolific is it ? :?
Tosic never played for bordeaux :roll:

Who did he play for then ? Thought he played under blanc at bordeaux ? :? If I am incorrect then I apologise

PI7ES
Posts: 735
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:38 am

Post by PI7ES »

partizan belgrade

User avatar
Percy Dalton
Posts: 6060
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:54 am
Location: Selling peanuts on the North Bank
Contact:

Post by Percy Dalton »

Fuck Tosic!

Let's sign Blanc to play alongside Campbell!

:lol:

User avatar
ambarron
Posts: 557
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:58 pm
Location: In a place where Arsenal sign players............

Post by ambarron »

Percy Dalton wrote:Fuck Tosic!

Let's sign Blanc to play alongside Campbell!

:lol:
na we dont wanna do that, might 'kill' the progress of Senderos......oh too late

rigsby
Posts: 3046
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:52 am

Post by rigsby »

I actually think Vermalen should move to the LB position and Sol coming in alongside Gallas for the rest of the season.

User avatar
augie
Posts: 30984
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Post by augie »

PI7ES wrote:partizan belgrade

There is being wide of the mark and there is being wide of the mark but my initial statement couldnt be any wider of the mark if the beast baptista himself had of hit it :oops: :oops: :oops:

User avatar
REB
Posts: 23439
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:40 pm
Location: meh

Post by REB »

sometimes even im annoyed reading the posts on here :roll:

if this is true then we have signed a striker whom a lot of clubs want so he cant be that bad and if true will also mean less games for bentdner and eduardo which wouldnt be a bad thing imo,

yes we need quality elsewhere and im quiet sure wenger knows that by now but we need new players and i for one look forward to seeing this guy in an arsenal shirt.

User avatar
brazilianGOONER
Posts: 9208
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:27 am
Location: i think we're parked, man
Contact:

Post by brazilianGOONER »

augie wrote:
PI7ES wrote:partizan belgrade

There is being wide of the mark and there is being wide of the mark but my initial statement couldnt be any wider of the mark if the beast baptista himself had of hit it :oops: :oops: :oops:
:coffeespit:

i may not agree with your opinions, augie, but you surely are a funny character :lol: :lol: :lol:

kg1794
Posts: 887
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:20 am
Location: N4

Post by kg1794 »

To be fair to Wenger Chamakh was at HH ready to sign in the summer then Bordeaux doubled the price because they found out we had sold Adebayor for 25mil.

User avatar
North bank girl
Posts: 821
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:22 pm
Location: oxford

Post by North bank girl »

northbankbren wrote:He has been talking alot about wanting to come to us, and I really hope its true. For free too, would be a great bit of buisness.
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 09,00.html


"My choice is to join Premier League and if I could choose, I will go to Arsenal."

User avatar
j0ke
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 2:25 pm

Post by j0ke »

I don't mind any player on a free, especially one who is wanted. But Chamakh, for all his hard work, his heading ability and his technical ability lacks the one thing we are crying for right now ... and that's for someone to put the ball at the back of the net!

Post Reply