Craig Murray at the Rocket

Post by **REB** » Fri Nov 23, 2007 7:55 am

craig murray has an agenda aganst usmanov and red action are giving him more exposure,, there are two sides to every story and im afraid i dont fully believe murrays version,, and no,, im not pro usmanov,,
im pro arsenal football club,, and the wish for my team to have the best players and to be the best on the field of player ,, be with the current board or with a new one

Cus Geezer · Post by **Cus Geezer** » Fri Nov 23, 2007 8:37 am

craig murray has an agenda aganst usmanov and red action are giving him more exposure

what's the purpose of this agenda then?

Post by **REB** » Fri Nov 23, 2007 9:40 am

all he does is give out about him,, i never heard and wouldnt want to know who he is,,
again im not pro usmanov but when his allegations are been forced to be withdrawn then something is wrong somewhere,,
so why invite him to the rocket,, again so red action can be the mouth peice of the clubs current board,,
havnt the current board and usmanov already met and i dont hear the current board bad mouthing the second biggest shareholder,, why would they when they leave red action bring there banners into the grove,,

sorry if im not going to follow the crowd but i like to be able to make my own mind up thank you,, i admire red action and what they are trying to do with the atmosphere etc but please dont let the club start using them for there own agenda

Cus Geezer · Post by **Cus Geezer** » Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:29 pm

but when his allegations are been forced to be withdrawn then something is wrong somewhere

He hasn't the funds for a libel case perhaps?

Post by **REB** » Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:43 pm

Cus Geezer wrote:
but when his allegations are been forced to be withdrawn then something is wrong somewhere
He hasn't the funds for a libel case perhaps?

cus,, im not getting into an argument,, i just think its strange the way the club are using red action when it suits,,

the clubs recent history with its support has not been an easy or good one and they are plenty of examples where suggestions made to the club havnt been addressed ,,ie the club anthem,,the ot,anfield whl banners.
and now all of a sudden red action turn into the mouthpeice of the board,, they are been used and the sad fact is they dont even realise it

Cus Geezer · Post by **Cus Geezer** » Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:47 pm

rebel gooner wrote:
Cus Geezer wrote:
but when his allegations are been forced to be withdrawn then something is wrong somewhere
He hasn't the funds for a libel case perhaps?
cus,, im not getting into an argument,, i just think its strange the way the club are using red action when it suits,,

the clubs recent history with its support has not been an easy or good one and they are plenty of examples where suggestions made to the club havnt been addressed ,,ie the club anthem,,the ot,anfield whl banners.
and now all of a sudden red action turn into the mouthpeice of the board,, they are been used and the sad fact is they dont even realise it

I think they do but know it's the lesser of two evils.

Like British Socialists backing the British establishment in WW2, didn't mean they liked the status quo but knew the alternative was far worse.

This backing for the current board is the footballing equivalent of realpolitik.