Fulham's Stockdale Injured - Schwarzer deal definitely off?

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
User avatar
HashKads
Posts: 5267
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:44 pm
Location: Maiden name: KingJayson

Post by HashKads »

I totally agree with Quartz explanation on all those players. The 2 he highlighted as mistakes were exactly that and the rest were correct.

Almunia has glimpses of greatness and then absolute shitness. Look at when we played Barcelona (I think) last year, he kept us pretty much in it in the first leg. But like people say, 1 mistake against a big team and its a goal. We just can't afford that and thats what cost us last year. He may have quick distribution but it is AWFUL! I'd go as far as saying 7 out of 10 balls distributed by him are unsuccessful.

Everybody knew we needed a new keeper since last May including Wenger and thats why he put a bid in for Schwarzer in May. So if it comes down to us not winning anything this year because of our goalkeepers then the fault lies at Wengers door for not addressing the problem he knew about.

Louder
Posts: 577
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:33 pm

Post by Louder »

augie wrote:Make no mistake, if this transfer window closes without the purchase of a new keeper the blame will not lie with any excuse or failure of fulham to sell but will land at the feet of a manager that has had 3 months to bring in a better keeper but as usual he has been cunting about waiting to save a quid or two by buying at the last minute again :evil: How this fool can make a bid for a keeper and wait another 3 months to make a second bid much less make the same bid twice is beyond me :roll: Really and truely we are run like a 2nd rate club nowadays and tbh I find it embarrassing :oops:
You really are amazing ! How do you know all this to be true ? You come across as far too intelligent to believe what you read in the red tops so what's your source ?

And regarding your embarrasment. Is this really and truly the way you feel about being a gooner ? Save yourself the disappointment and find something else to do. You must be so unhappy being a gooner, you poor thing 8)

AA23Northbank

Post by AA23Northbank »

If Almunia plays like yesterday in every game of the season I'll be happy with that, but still annoyed we didn't get our new keeper. Now let's see how the season goes before we rant, cry, curse etc etc

VTH :barscarf: :barscarf: :barscarf:

User avatar
HashKads
Posts: 5267
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:44 pm
Location: Maiden name: KingJayson

Post by HashKads »

Louder wrote:
augie wrote:Make no mistake, if this transfer window closes without the purchase of a new keeper the blame will not lie with any excuse or failure of fulham to sell but will land at the feet of a manager that has had 3 months to bring in a better keeper but as usual he has been cunting about waiting to save a quid or two by buying at the last minute again :evil: How this fool can make a bid for a keeper and wait another 3 months to make a second bid much less make the same bid twice is beyond me :roll: Really and truely we are run like a 2nd rate club nowadays and tbh I find it embarrassing :oops:
You really are amazing ! How do you know all this to be true ? You come across as far too intelligent to believe what you read in the red tops so what's your source ?

And regarding your embarrasment. Is this really and truly the way you feel about being a gooner ? Save yourself the disappointment and find something else to do. You must be so unhappy being a gooner, you poor thing 8)
To be fair on Augie, I did hear Mark Hughes come out and say we bid £2mil in May which was rejected then £2mil again a couple of weeks ago which was also rejected.

Louder
Posts: 577
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:33 pm

Post by Louder »

Where did you hear this ? ( that was my question, mate :wink: )

User avatar
the playing mantis
Posts: 4820
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:36 pm
Location: EX

Post by the playing mantis »

the times and telegraph have also reported the scwarzer bids...i suppose these are rep tops too...............

although john ley and gary jacop especially are both spurs pricks.

swords
Posts: 75
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 1:18 pm

Post by swords »

john ley a heeb?he was on arsenal tv with tom watt last week??

can't wait for window to close with a keeper hopefully signed...


then the moaners can go back to picking on denilson!

Louder
Posts: 577
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:33 pm

Post by Louder »

the playing mantis wrote:the times and telegraph have also reported the scwarzer bids...i suppose these are rep tops too...............

although john ley and gary jacop especially are both spurs pricks.
Maybe not, but they've still got to fill their pages. I tend to buy the Telegraph but only remember the 'reported' bids 'reportedly' being in the 'region' of 2m.

'reportedly' meaning 'probably' meaning 'possibly' meaning 'maybe' meaning 'probably f*!king not' :banghead:

LDB
Posts: 6663
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:13 pm
Location: Having a cup of tea and waiting for all this to blow over

Post by LDB »

kingjayson1 wrote:
Louder wrote:
augie wrote:Make no mistake, if this transfer window closes without the purchase of a new keeper the blame will not lie with any excuse or failure of fulham to sell but will land at the feet of a manager that has had 3 months to bring in a better keeper but as usual he has been cunting about waiting to save a quid or two by buying at the last minute again :evil: How this fool can make a bid for a keeper and wait another 3 months to make a second bid much less make the same bid twice is beyond me :roll: Really and truely we are run like a 2nd rate club nowadays and tbh I find it embarrassing :oops:
You really are amazing ! How do you know all this to be true ? You come across as far too intelligent to believe what you read in the red tops so what's your source ?

And regarding your embarrasment. Is this really and truly the way you feel about being a gooner ? Save yourself the disappointment and find something else to do. You must be so unhappy being a gooner, you poor thing 8)
To be fair on Augie, I did hear Mark Hughes come out and say we bid £2mil in May which was rejected then £2mil again a couple of weeks ago which was also rejected.
My understanding was that when we originally bid fulham told us to fuck off because they didnt have a manager at the time. Once they had appointed a new manager we tabled the bid again to remind them that it was still on the table. Why place a higher bid when the original was never rejected?

Louder
Posts: 577
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:33 pm

Post by Louder »

LDB wrote:
kingjayson1 wrote:
Louder wrote:
augie wrote:Make no mistake, if this transfer window closes without the purchase of a new keeper the blame will not lie with any excuse or failure of fulham to sell but will land at the feet of a manager that has had 3 months to bring in a better keeper but as usual he has been cunting about waiting to save a quid or two by buying at the last minute again :evil: How this fool can make a bid for a keeper and wait another 3 months to make a second bid much less make the same bid twice is beyond me :roll: Really and truely we are run like a 2nd rate club nowadays and tbh I find it embarrassing :oops:
You really are amazing ! How do you know all this to be true ? You come across as far too intelligent to believe what you read in the red tops so what's your source ?

And regarding your embarrasment. Is this really and truly the way you feel about being a gooner ? Save yourself the disappointment and find something else to do. You must be so unhappy being a gooner, you poor thing 8)
To be fair on Augie, I did hear Mark Hughes come out and say we bid £2mil in May which was rejected then £2mil again a couple of weeks ago which was also rejected.
My understanding was that when we originally bid fulham told us to fuck off because they didnt have a manager at the time. Once they had appointed a new manager we tabled the bid again to remind them that it was still on the table. Why place a higher bid when the original was never rejected?
Now that makes more sense, well played :barscarf:

User avatar
the playing mantis
Posts: 4820
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:36 pm
Location: EX

Post by the playing mantis »

i sure ley is a ****, ive heard it somewhere and hes very pro sperz imo.

hes not as bad as jacob though, hes a grade a wanker

User avatar
merson_is_god
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 11:43 am
Location: At the computer

Post by merson_is_god »

swap deal....flappyhandski for schwarzer! go on sparky you know it makes sense!

mrgnu1958
Posts: 13369
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 10:32 pm
Location: ESSEX

Post by mrgnu1958 »

great deal that for fulham..Flappy...erm fabianski is a great goalie ya know..............................












:wink: :shock:

User avatar
QuartzGooner
Posts: 14474
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 pm
Location: London

Post by QuartzGooner »

USMartin wrote: Your explanations are irrelevant in the sense that even the decisions which I would endorse were bad decisions because of their timing coinciding with other key deoartures and the failure in many of most of the cases to acquire genuinely adequate replacements. The fact that you acknolwedge any of these decisions were financially driven is sufficient cause for alarm - we are Arsenal Football Club - not Arsenal Investment Club or Arsenal Budget Balancing Club.

Indeed the Board's strategy risks turning us into another Leeds more than anything else right now.Under-ivestment backfiring is just as dangerous as over-investment backfiring.
.
My explanations were not irrelevant, they were responses to your post which you filled with mistaken reasons as to why certain players left!

But I agree that we did not adequately replace enough of the players who left 2005 - 2008.

It is not dangerous that decisions were made on a a financial basis, because in building a new stadium the club were going to be short of cash, regardless of what any director ever said.

A new Leeds?
No. Very different situation to them.
We will struggle to win the title, but have a reasonable chance of fourth.
Much more reasonable should if buy a decent new goalkeeper!

User avatar
OneBardGooner
Posts: 48339
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:41 am
Location: Close To The Edge

Post by OneBardGooner »

The thing is AW - having made a bid for another goalie - one who if signed would replace almunia - But now that it (looks like it's ) not going to happen, that leaves an already (incompetent and unconfident) almunia - knowing that if AW could he would replace him.....

Even so, AW has had all summer to find a replacement - and splash the cash - rather than do his usual tightwad type of bidding....so regardless - almunia "knows 1,000%" that he is not rated by AW as being good enough for the No 1 spot..... and so AW has shot himself and us in the foot.

The sooner Szchezny is ready to take the number 1 spot the better!

we are F*cked as regards winning the prem this season...and Almunia is still and always will be

a

C U N T

Post Reply