Where did I claim that? I simply you noted that you focused on my including him on a list of players some of whom had been allowed to leave for purely financial reasons to mis-leadingly claim I was saying that about him. Here is what you saidQuartzGooner wrote: You listed a bunch of players we lost over money.
I dismissed all but two as leaving for that reason.
I commented on every single one of the players listed.
Yet you claim I only commented on Silvestre?
That was what I was taking exception to. I have never said you mentioned no other players earlier. I was noting you mentioned no other players there and avoided mentioning other players who did not support you argument.QuartzGooner wrote:How can you honestly suggest Silvestre was not offered a new contract to save money?
In afct I have made this same argument a number of times with you, so it wasn't some aciident or misunderstanding.
Funny that.USMartin wrote:Pires - victim of cost-cutting to pay for the Highbury re-development
Gilberto - See Pires
Vieira - See Pires
Anelka - a very good bit of business that ultimately improved the team
Diarra - bought to replace Flamini and/or Gilberto really. Utterly mis-managed situation. Should have been loaned out and brought back the next summer.
Flamini - bet if had made a genuine offer for say 70 K a week he would have stayed. Again a victim of the cost-cutting for me.
Just another badly argued and bizarre post from you.
Pot.Kettle.Black.QuartzGooner wrote:Mr Word Twister.
Now you are just being a naked hypocrite.
OHHHHHHHH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOQuartzGooner wrote:You are incapable of putting a proper argument together.
What'll I do? I can't put an argument together!
So what are you wasting your time arguing with me for then?
