Manure's debt rises!!!!!

It's all a load of Cannonballs in here! This is the virtual Arsenal pub where you can chat about anything except football. Be warned though, like any pub, the content may not always be suitable for everyone.
Post Reply
User avatar
Exiled-Gooner
Posts: 1089
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 3:26 pm
Location: the spirit of 69!

Manure's debt rises!!!!!

Post by Exiled-Gooner »

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Busine ... Of_%3F100m

Read this on sky news and laughed my gonads off.Reading USmartins posts reference our board...well squire i think i know which board i like!!!

I've been wondering why Ferguscum has been doing a wenger and using kids instead of buying?

User avatar
Cockerill's chin
Posts: 1278
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 12:57 pm
Location: Found the transfer fund... in Bendtner/Diaby/Denilson's pockets

Post by Cockerill's chin »

The only problem is that the prudence of our board will have been for nothing if somebody buys their shares against leveraged debt.

More accurately, the under-investment for a club of our stature would have been for nothing for us fans. For shareholders it would have been very worthwhile. I hate making that point, USM has almost conditioned me away from it. :oops:

The Ronaldo transfer papered over some large cracks for the manure last year. :lol:

User avatar
USMartin
Posts: 5491
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 4:44 pm
Location: Hartford, CT

Post by USMartin »

Cockerill's chin wrote:The only problem is that the prudence of our board will have been for nothing if somebody buys their shares against leveraged debt.

More accurately, the under-investment for a club of our stature would have been for nothing for us fans. For shareholders it would have been very worthwhile. I hate making that point, USM has almost conditioned me away from it. :oops:

The Ronaldo transfer papered over some large cracks for the manure last year. :lol:
Pretty bang-on about the debt-leverage isuue CC. If we were sold in such a circumstance at any point it would be bad enough but if this happen while the stadium were not fully paid for we would genuinely be more danger financially than either Liverpool or United no matter how prudent or new owners were ot weren't.

For me watching what happens at United and Liverpool should only serve as a warning to all of us and hopefully to the club as well about the very real perils of getting involved with debt leverage.

User avatar
Basil is a Gooner
Posts: 7025
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 10:04 am
Location: Anywhere away from you lot.....

Post by Basil is a Gooner »

Image

User avatar
olgitgooner
Posts: 7431
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 12:39 am
Location: Brexitland

Post by olgitgooner »

We have all known about the evils of debt-leveraged buy outs for years. Even before the arrival of USM on these pages. :wink:

Man utd have been extremely successful in recent years. This is largely due to having massive funds available for players. They have purchased their trophies with borrowed money.

Shit has now hit fan. Good. Maybe they will sell Rooney soon, to make the figures look better. :D

AA23Northbank

Post by AA23Northbank »

My only contribution to this thread is ha ha United :barscarf: :D :twisted:

User avatar
HashKads
Posts: 5267
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:44 pm
Location: Maiden name: KingJayson

Post by HashKads »

Has Martin been on lately, I need to ask him a question? :lol:

User avatar
USMartin
Posts: 5491
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 4:44 pm
Location: Hartford, CT

Post by USMartin »

kingjayson1 wrote:Has Martin been on lately, I need to ask him a question? :lol:
If the question is does this prove our Board has been doing this the best way possible for Arsenal the answer would be no. It does prove they haven't done things the worst way possible, but it doesn't prove our Board couldn't do a better job for Arsenal, blah blah blah................

Post Reply