As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Chippy wrote:This will be my third game of the season. First 2 were Newcastle and Scum. Anyone superstitious? Should I go?
next game after that is Chavs.
Could I be at 4 home defeats?
You will be alright this Sat.
The Scum match wasn't your fault Chippy, I've not brought the up before but the last scum match that DB10 attended was also the 4-4.
So I'm blaming him for the recent defeat!
The Chavs....will providing we play the chavs of the now! I think we can actually beat them!
However, if they start improving and getting players back then.....
And you were "running late" for both games... I blame you for the results because you were being henpecked! Man up, online son - MAN THE FUCK UP!
But in 09 we won when you weren't present!
So for you that's 2 visits and no wins against the scum. You're banned from next years derby.
With a Pantsil/Hangeland header sometime in the first half and a Chamakh fouled for a RvP converted penalty in the 2nd. Arshavin and let's say Rosicky for the others.
With a Pantsil/Hangeland header sometime in the first half and a Chamakh fouled for a RvP converted penalty in the 2nd. Arshavin and let's say Rosicky for the others.
Unless AW changes the formation RVP and Chamack will not be in the team together......unless it gets to squeeky-bum time.
With a Pantsil/Hangeland header sometime in the first half and a Chamakh fouled for a RvP converted penalty in the 2nd. Arshavin and let's say Rosicky for the others.
Unless AW changes the formation RVP and Chamack will not be in the team together......unless it gets to squeeky-bum time.
You really think that? You think that he'd bench one over the other? I'm not disagreeing/slating you, I'm actually interested in your opinion?
With a Pantsil/Hangeland header sometime in the first half and a Chamakh fouled for a RvP converted penalty in the 2nd. Arshavin and let's say Rosicky for the others.
Unless AW changes the formation RVP and Chamack will not be in the team together......unless it gets to squeeky-bum time.
You really think that? You think that he'd bench one over the other? I'm not disagreeing/slating you, I'm actually interested in your opinion?
Simply, yes!
When have you seen them start together?
Well I kinda thought that they hadn't had a chance to play together as RvP has been injured for 24 years.
In a 4-3-3 I'd have Chamakh and Walcott at the top with RvP in the middle sat slightly deeper to feed them. I agree that Chamakh is a leading striker/target man, but I think RvP can play the deep-lying supplier.
I know Wenger likes to play two nippies either side of a leading striker (Arshavin and Walcott or Nasri flanking Chamakh) but I think they could play together.
It'll be interesting anyway to see the teamsheet this weekend to see what he'll do!
psychoangus wrote:Well I kinda thought that they hadn't had a chance to play together as RvP has been injured for 24 years.
In a 4-3-3 I'd have Chamakh and Walcott at the top with RvP in the middle sat slightly deeper to feed them. I agree that Chamakh is a leading striker/target man, but I think RvP can play the deep-lying supplier.
I know Wenger likes to play two nippies either side of a leading striker (Arshavin and Walcott or Nasri flanking Chamakh) but I think they could play together.
It'll be interesting anyway to see the teamsheet this weekend to see what he'll do!
So are you asking RVP to track back? Won't work!
That's a very FM formation with 3 central strikers.
ATM we have 1 striker with 2 outside wingers which drift in. They also track back.
psychoangus wrote:Well I kinda thought that they hadn't had a chance to play together as RvP has been injured for 24 years.
In a 4-3-3 I'd have Chamakh and Walcott at the top with RvP in the middle sat slightly deeper to feed them. I agree that Chamakh is a leading striker/target man, but I think RvP can play the deep-lying supplier.
I know Wenger likes to play two nippies either side of a leading striker (Arshavin and Walcott or Nasri flanking Chamakh) but I think they could play together.
It'll be interesting anyway to see the teamsheet this weekend to see what he'll do!
So are you asking RVP to track back? Won't work!
That's a very FM formation with 3 central strikers.
ATM we have 1 striker with 2 outside wingers which drift in. They also track back.
If thats the case why did we buy Chamakh or why didnt we sell RVP? one as cover for the other? i cant see it!!! When they are both fully fit they will play in the same team
psychoangus wrote:Well I kinda thought that they hadn't had a chance to play together as RvP has been injured for 24 years.
In a 4-3-3 I'd have Chamakh and Walcott at the top with RvP in the middle sat slightly deeper to feed them. I agree that Chamakh is a leading striker/target man, but I think RvP can play the deep-lying supplier.
I know Wenger likes to play two nippies either side of a leading striker (Arshavin and Walcott or Nasri flanking Chamakh) but I think they could play together.
It'll be interesting anyway to see the teamsheet this weekend to see what he'll do!
So are you asking RVP to track back? Won't work!
That's a very FM formation with 3 central strikers.
ATM we have 1 striker with 2 outside wingers which drift in. They also track back.
If thats the case why did we buy Chamakh or why didnt we sell RVP? one as cover for the other? i cant see it!!! When they are both fully fit they will play in the same team
This is my opinion too. However, I'll be very interested to see how this pans out now.
