FULHAM HOME THREAD

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
User avatar
Boomer
Posts: 8604
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:00 am
Location: Putting the 'THE' back in the Arsenal.

Post by Boomer »

flash gunner wrote:
Boomer wrote:
psychoangus wrote:Well I kinda thought that they hadn't had a chance to play together as RvP has been injured for 24 years.

In a 4-3-3 I'd have Chamakh and Walcott at the top with RvP in the middle sat slightly deeper to feed them. I agree that Chamakh is a leading striker/target man, but I think RvP can play the deep-lying supplier.

I know Wenger likes to play two nippies either side of a leading striker (Arshavin and Walcott or Nasri flanking Chamakh) but I think they could play together.

It'll be interesting anyway to see the teamsheet this weekend to see what he'll do!
So are you asking RVP to track back? Won't work!
That's a very FM formation with 3 central strikers.
ATM we have 1 striker with 2 outside wingers which drift in. They also track back.
If thats the case why did we buy Chamakh or why didnt we sell RVP? one as cover for the other? i cant see it!!! When they are both fully fit they will play in the same team
Hang on Flash! You were only quoting the other day about the quality through the squad.
For once we have options up front. Yes cover or rotation even different option.
The person who's really in trouble would be Bendtner.

If AW does pick them both (which is tactically stupid) I bet he'd stick RVP outwide! :roll:

User avatar
Arsenal 1991
Posts: 3219
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:53 pm
Location: England

Post by Arsenal 1991 »

Boomer wrote:
flash gunner wrote:
Boomer wrote:
psychoangus wrote:Well I kinda thought that they hadn't had a chance to play together as RvP has been injured for 24 years.

In a 4-3-3 I'd have Chamakh and Walcott at the top with RvP in the middle sat slightly deeper to feed them. I agree that Chamakh is a leading striker/target man, but I think RvP can play the deep-lying supplier.

I know Wenger likes to play two nippies either side of a leading striker (Arshavin and Walcott or Nasri flanking Chamakh) but I think they could play together.

It'll be interesting anyway to see the teamsheet this weekend to see what he'll do!
So are you asking RVP to track back? Won't work!
That's a very FM formation with 3 central strikers.
ATM we have 1 striker with 2 outside wingers which drift in. They also track back.
If thats the case why did we buy Chamakh or why didnt we sell RVP? one as cover for the other? i cant see it!!! When they are both fully fit they will play in the same team
Hang on Flash! You were only quoting the other day about the quality through the squad.
For once we have options up front. Yes cover or rotation even different option.
The person who's really in trouble would be Bendtner.

If AW does pick them both (which is tactically stupid) I bet he'd stick RVP outwide! :roll:
Or just play the way we did on tuesday but with chamakh instead of bentdner

User avatar
Boomer
Posts: 8604
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:00 am
Location: Putting the 'THE' back in the Arsenal.

Post by Boomer »

Arsenal 1991 wrote:
Boomer wrote:
flash gunner wrote:
Boomer wrote:
psychoangus wrote:Well I kinda thought that they hadn't had a chance to play together as RvP has been injured for 24 years.

In a 4-3-3 I'd have Chamakh and Walcott at the top with RvP in the middle sat slightly deeper to feed them. I agree that Chamakh is a leading striker/target man, but I think RvP can play the deep-lying supplier.

I know Wenger likes to play two nippies either side of a leading striker (Arshavin and Walcott or Nasri flanking Chamakh) but I think they could play together.

It'll be interesting anyway to see the teamsheet this weekend to see what he'll do!
So are you asking RVP to track back? Won't work!
That's a very FM formation with 3 central strikers.
ATM we have 1 striker with 2 outside wingers which drift in. They also track back.
If thats the case why did we buy Chamakh or why didnt we sell RVP? one as cover for the other? i cant see it!!! When they are both fully fit they will play in the same team
Hang on Flash! You were only quoting the other day about the quality through the squad.
For once we have options up front. Yes cover or rotation even different option.
The person who's really in trouble would be Bendtner.

If AW does pick them both (which is tactically stupid) I bet he'd stick RVP outwide! :roll:
Or just play the way we did on tuesday but with chamakh instead of bentdner
Which was a 4-4-2 not 4-3-3 as we've just discussed.

The two can't play in the current 4-3-3 set-up

User avatar
flash gunner
Posts: 29243
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 6:55 am
Location: Armchairsville. FACT.

Post by flash gunner »

Boomer when did i post about quality throughout the squad? I genuinely cant remember. Anyway i cant see Wenger buying Chamakh to have him and RVP in a rotational thing, i think RVP could and should play wide left (or right) of the forward 3 with Chamkh central and Bendtner sold

User avatar
Boomer
Posts: 8604
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:00 am
Location: Putting the 'THE' back in the Arsenal.

Post by Boomer »

flash gunner wrote:Boomer when did i post about quality throughout the squad? I genuinely cant remember. Anyway i cant see Wenger buying Chamakh to have him and RVP in a rotational thing, i think RVP could and should play wide left (or right) of the forward 3 with Chamkh central and Bendtner sold
Just a comment in the Wenger "I have no room for new signings." thread. You mentioned 3 key area's which need strengthening.

What you said about RVP wide on either flank was what I mentioned. I don't think it would fully work for us. RVP is too slow and would also require him to track back.

User avatar
psychoangus
Posts: 722
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:31 pm
Location: Stevenage

Post by psychoangus »

Well....Quite nice to have the options for once anyway!

gunner_ace
Posts: 679
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 7:52 am
Location: leeds

Post by gunner_ace »

whats the weather like in London? travelling down from Leeds so dont want to get there and have Arsenal call off the game for H&S reasons like they did last season in the CC.

User avatar
Chippy
Posts: 9480
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:09 pm
Location: A town called malice.

Post by Chippy »

gunner_ace wrote:whats the weather like in London? travelling down from Leeds so dont want to get there and have Arsenal call off the game for H&S reasons like they did last season in the CC.
All stopped now. Going to be tropical tomorrow. 5C. :D

User avatar
Henry Norris 1913
Posts: 8374
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:25 pm

Post by Henry Norris 1913 »

Chippy wrote:
gunner_ace wrote:whats the weather like in London? travelling down from Leeds so dont want to get there and have Arsenal call off the game for H&S reasons like they did last season in the CC.
All stopped now. Going to be tropical tomorrow. 5C. :D
shorts and t-shirt weather :barscarf:

gunner_ace
Posts: 679
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 7:52 am
Location: leeds

Post by gunner_ace »

sorted. Ill leave my long johns at home then.

User avatar
psychoangus
Posts: 722
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:31 pm
Location: Stevenage

Post by psychoangus »

Boomer wrote:
flash gunner wrote:Boomer when did i post about quality throughout the squad? I genuinely cant remember. Anyway i cant see Wenger buying Chamakh to have him and RVP in a rotational thing, i think RVP could and should play wide left (or right) of the forward 3 with Chamkh central and Bendtner sold
Just a comment in the Wenger "I have no room for new signings." thread. You mentioned 3 key area's which need strengthening.

What you said about RVP wide on either flank was what I mentioned. I don't think it would fully work for us. RVP is too slow and would also require him to track back.
http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-archiv ... d-chamakh-

And as if by magic........! :lol:

I feel that's one to me Boomer/Percy!

User avatar
Chippy
Posts: 9480
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:09 pm
Location: A town called malice.

Post by Chippy »

Crapping myself. Anyone know the last time we lost 3 home league games on the trot? :( :( :(

User avatar
augie
Posts: 30957
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Post by augie »

psychoangus wrote:
Boomer wrote:
flash gunner wrote:Boomer when did i post about quality throughout the squad? I genuinely cant remember. Anyway i cant see Wenger buying Chamakh to have him and RVP in a rotational thing, i think RVP could and should play wide left (or right) of the forward 3 with Chamkh central and Bendtner sold
Just a comment in the Wenger "I have no room for new signings." thread. You mentioned 3 key area's which need strengthening.

What you said about RVP wide on either flank was what I mentioned. I don't think it would fully work for us. RVP is too slow and would also require him to track back.
http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-archiv ... d-chamakh-

And as if by magic........! :lol:

I feel that's one to me Boomer/Percy!

This defies belief for me.........we have a natural No.10 striker (playing off the front man) in arshavin and have marooned him on the wing for 2 seasons but now we are going to change the system to accomodate rvp and chamakh ? :shock: Dont get me wrong cos personally I would be a lot happier reverting to 4-4-2 (or 3-5-2 even) but jeez play the best players in their best positions :roll: :banghead:

User avatar
augie
Posts: 30957
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:03 pm
Location: Ireland

Post by augie »

Anyway onto the game itself and I am predicting a comfortable 3-1 if we score in the first 30mins or otherwise it could be a long afternoon ending up with a 1-1 or 2-1 late winner

User avatar
Arsenal 1991
Posts: 3219
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:53 pm
Location: England

Post by Arsenal 1991 »

augie wrote:
psychoangus wrote:
Boomer wrote:
flash gunner wrote:Boomer when did i post about quality throughout the squad? I genuinely cant remember. Anyway i cant see Wenger buying Chamakh to have him and RVP in a rotational thing, i think RVP could and should play wide left (or right) of the forward 3 with Chamkh central and Bendtner sold
Just a comment in the Wenger "I have no room for new signings." thread. You mentioned 3 key area's which need strengthening.

What you said about RVP wide on either flank was what I mentioned. I don't think it would fully work for us. RVP is too slow and would also require him to track back.
http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-archiv ... d-chamakh-

And as if by magic........! :lol:

I feel that's one to me Boomer/Percy!

This defies belief for me.........we have a natural No.10 striker (playing off the front man) in arshavin and have marooned him on the wing for 2 seasons but now we are going to change the system to accomodate rvp and chamakh ? :shock: Dont get me wrong cos personally I would be a lot happier reverting to 4-4-2 (or 3-5-2 even) but jeez play the best players in their best positions :roll: :banghead:
I don't get this with arshavin, people seem to ignore his lack of effort and make excuses for him saying hes being played out of position. He might do well but he'd be much more of a hindrance imo with the effort hes been putting in. Also look at barca's front three, is villa a natural left winger?

Post Reply