Arshavin - Cutting The Mustard?
Arshavin - Cutting The Mustard?
Due to family commitments I was unable to see the Chelsea game last night. IN years gone by I would have moved heaven and earth to be there or see it with family taking a back seat. I firmly believe had I made the effort we'd have not one - I am the centre of the universe you know!
Having only seen the goals today I wondered what was different - in a moment of clarity I had a very srong feeling that Arshavin had not played yesterday which I just read was the case.
Does anyone else think this is significant, for me he has just not done very much since scoring 4 at Anfield. He reminds me of Berbatov, when he's on form he's World class but that sadly is one game in 10. The rest of the time he just looks like he can't be arsed and doesn't care.
£18m - you can see why Wenger is reluctant to spend on the big names!
Rob.
Having only seen the goals today I wondered what was different - in a moment of clarity I had a very srong feeling that Arshavin had not played yesterday which I just read was the case.
Does anyone else think this is significant, for me he has just not done very much since scoring 4 at Anfield. He reminds me of Berbatov, when he's on form he's World class but that sadly is one game in 10. The rest of the time he just looks like he can't be arsed and doesn't care.
£18m - you can see why Wenger is reluctant to spend on the big names!
Rob.
I posted this on Arshavin thread earlier, it's very interesting read, I think...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog ... f-comments
Arsenal's players have been grumbling among themselves about what they perceive to be the preferential treatment afforded by the manager, Arsène Wenger, to Andrey Arshavin. The Russia forward tends to enjoy a roaming brief yet without the responsibility to track back, even in training. Wenger reasons that Arshavin is worth it because he has the capacity to change a game with one flash of genius. But even Wenger reached the end of his tether at Arshavin's non-performance at Manchester United two weeks ago.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog ... f-comments
Arsenal's players have been grumbling among themselves about what they perceive to be the preferential treatment afforded by the manager, Arsène Wenger, to Andrey Arshavin. The Russia forward tends to enjoy a roaming brief yet without the responsibility to track back, even in training. Wenger reasons that Arshavin is worth it because he has the capacity to change a game with one flash of genius. But even Wenger reached the end of his tether at Arshavin's non-performance at Manchester United two weeks ago.
- QuartzGooner
- Posts: 14474
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 pm
- Location: London
-
- Posts: 5491
- Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:06 pm
- Location: Aberystwyth
no, only goals and he has only scored 6 goals this season, the 4th highest top scorer in the team, jointly with Cesc, not good enoughdonaldo wrote:To hear some say he does nothing.He has more assists than any other Arsenal player and is the 3rd highest in the assists in the premiership this season.Dont assists count?

his main problem for me is the lack of tracking back and how he just gives up when he loses possession of the ball, stopping to work out in his mind how someone was able to take the ball from his russian feet.


-
- Posts: 2710
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:27 pm
- Location: every full moon
I was a big fan of AA before we signed him. I watched quite a few games when he played for Zenit St. Petersburg in the EUFA cup and Russia leading up to Euro 2008, but as the OP says, he hasn't really done anything since the 4 at Anfield. He still has the ability to turn a game with his individual brilliance, but most times he just doesn't look like he gives a shit. I still think AW is playing him out of position, as he is best centrally "in the hole" so to say, but with CF4 there he won't be getting much oppertunities there, especially if he doesn't bother to track back like Cesc does.
As Quartz said, Marin would be a good replacement - if we want to look at a like-for-like replacement.
Personally, I would now sell him and look at buying Scott Parker from the Hammers (good at DM or AM) or Mickel Arteta.
As Quartz said, Marin would be a good replacement - if we want to look at a like-for-like replacement.
Personally, I would now sell him and look at buying Scott Parker from the Hammers (good at DM or AM) or Mickel Arteta.
- I Hate Hleb
- Posts: 18632
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 3:36 pm
- Location: London
I like Arshavin as a player.
I don't think he does enough for us though on both sides of the ball.
Easily the most intelligent player I've seen since Bergkamp retired and who is not Fabreags.
Would excel in a full flowing truely confident Arsenal side. Very much a shame he doesn't because he's truely capable.
I don't think he does enough for us though on both sides of the ball.
Easily the most intelligent player I've seen since Bergkamp retired and who is not Fabreags.
Would excel in a full flowing truely confident Arsenal side. Very much a shame he doesn't because he's truely capable.
-
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 2:14 pm
- Location: Islington
- QuartzGooner
- Posts: 14474
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 12:49 pm
- Location: London
We did well yesterday because we pressed, worked hard, tracked back etc.
How much of this does Arshavin do?
Not much.
Yes he has some assists, a few goals, but so might a less technically talented but harder working player, who would also track back.
I agree with those who say his best position is likely behind the striker, but it does not look as if he will play there much, so probably best for his career and our team if we replace him in the summer.
How much of this does Arshavin do?
Not much.
Yes he has some assists, a few goals, but so might a less technically talented but harder working player, who would also track back.
I agree with those who say his best position is likely behind the striker, but it does not look as if he will play there much, so probably best for his career and our team if we replace him in the summer.