He'd have done a hell of a lot more than Bendtner AND Arshavin combined I can guarantee you that. Shocking substitutions. When did I miss RVP signing a new contract stating he has to play 90 minutes no matter what?1989 wrote:I don't see what Chamakh would've added to our game. He can't finish either, and we can't cross. He would've been useless.rodders999 wrote:What had Chamackh done to Wenger?
BLUE MANCS UP NEXT
-
rodders999
- Posts: 22755
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:59 pm
- Location: Diamond Club
-
Irish Gooner
- Posts: 3156
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:47 pm
- Location: Ireland
Agreed.1989 wrote:I don't see what Chamakh would've added to our game. He can't finish either, and we can't cross. He would've been useless.rodders999 wrote:What had Chamackh done to Wenger?
Wenger needed to go Bendtner on for RVP who was very poor barring the two shots.
If another change was needed then Arshavin on the left, Nasri dropping back and Wilshere off.
Instead we seen Arshavin and Bendtner out of position on opposing flanks. Really pathetically poor decision making tonight.
-
Bring Back Pires
- Posts: 2977
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 3:23 pm
-
Irish Gooner
- Posts: 3156
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:47 pm
- Location: Ireland
Nah but I would think you Mr Louder are surely in your teenage years evidently since all you do is post smilies like a child and make idiotic posts like calling Roberto Mancini - Mankini because he dared embarrass the great one, Lord Arsene.Louder wrote:Jog on ?Irish Gooner wrote:Man-kiniLouder wrote: You think Man-kini told his players not to shoot at our goal ?. ( Louder age 4 )
Wow your hilarious aren't you.
No on second thoughts your a boring little twat that hasn't a clue.
Now jog on.Ahhh teenagers
-
Henry Norris 1913
- Posts: 8374
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:25 pm
stop fishingLouder wrote:Jog on ?Irish Gooner wrote:Man-kiniLouder wrote: You think Man-kini told his players not to shoot at our goal ?. ( Louder age 4 )
Wow your hilarious aren't you.
No on second thoughts your a boring little twat that hasn't a clue.
Now jog on.
that was the worst game of football I've seen
From our point of view that was obviously very disappointing and of course we will be frustrated at citeeh's tactics but the slating of them for adopting that attitude defies belief Are we the same Arsenal fans who have slated wenger for playing a wide open expansive game against barca twice last season ? Did we not complain that we should have adopted a defensive approach to negate them ? Citeeh did that tonight and did it very well so fair play to them and instead of knocking them for it I will say that if we dont win it I hope they do.
Wenger's substitutions and tactics defied belief again tonight Personally I felt that theo had shot his load and had totally gone out of the game but bringing on bedtner instead of wilshire and then playing him as a left winger is beyond ridiculous 
Bedtner is shit and I will say that and he is the worst 6ft 4" player at winning headers that I have ever ever seen playing the game 
If wenger decided he was goona win the game for us, and I am fcuked if I know how he could come to that conclusion, then play the long streak of piss up front then cos it aint fcuking rocket science You want to win a game against a team playing defensively then at least go two up front Wenger has not got a fcuking clue and how he left rvp on is beyond me 
Are we the same Arsenal fans who have slated wenger for playing a wide open expansive game against barca twice last season ? Did we not complain that we should have adopted a defensive approach to negate them ? Citeeh did that tonight and did it very well so fair play to them and instead of knocking them for it I will say that if we dont win it I hope they do.Wenger's substitutions and tactics defied belief again tonight
Personally I felt that theo had shot his load and had totally gone out of the game but bringing on bedtner instead of wilshire and then playing him as a left winger is beyond ridiculous Bedtner is shit and I will say that and he is the worst 6ft 4" player at winning headers that I have ever ever seen playing the game If wenger decided he was goona win the game for us, and I am fcuked if I know how he could come to that conclusion, then play the long streak of piss up front then cos it aint fcuking rocket science You want to win a game against a team playing defensively then at least go two up front Wenger has not got a fcuking clue and how he left rvp on is beyond me Arsene Wenger wasn't embarrassed by Man-kini at all tonight. Not at all !!Irish Gooner wrote:Nah but I would think you Mr Louder are surely in your teenage years evidently since all you do is post smilies like a child and make idiotic posts like calling Roberto Mancini - Mankini because he dared embarrass the great one, Lord Arsene.Louder wrote:Jog on ?Irish Gooner wrote:Man-kiniLouder wrote: You think Man-kini told his players not to shoot at our goal ?. ( Louder age 4 )
Wow your hilarious aren't you.
No on second thoughts your a boring little twat that hasn't a clue.
Now jog on.
-
Irish Gooner
- Posts: 3156
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:47 pm
- Location: Ireland
What are blabbering about now Martin, were did I mention Ferguson?USMartin wrote:You'd rather watch the c**t Ferguson who would shoot his own mother in the back for a win and feel proud of it celebrate another trophy? Really?Irish Gooner wrote:Well at least the Wenger apologists have their excuses to use again tonight about "anti football".
Look at a tape of us under Graham. I applaud City's defensive display, top class. They came for a draw and got it, fair play to them.
Wenger had 90 minutes to react, again failed in fact taking off our best attacker in Walcott for the back heeling circus act Arshavin.
The only consolation is we now know for sure this bunch of clowns won't win the league, United have it sewn up already and it's only January.
Anyway fair play at least a post without the board mentioned.
When brevity accomplishes my purpose I'll always choose that. Always have in fact....even on here...AA23Northbank wrote:I actually think this is one of your best posts on this forum, keep it short and simple Martin and you'll go farUSMartin wrote:You'd rather watch the c**t Ferguson who would shoot his own mother in the back for a win and feel proud of it celebrate another trophy? Really?Irish Gooner wrote:Well at least the Wenger apologists have their excuses to use again tonight about "anti football".
Look at a tape of us under Graham. I applaud City's defensive display, top class. They came for a draw and got it, fair play to them.
Wenger had 90 minutes to react, again failed in fact taking off our best attacker in Walcott for the back heeling circus act Arshavin.
The only consolation is we now know for sure this bunch of clowns won't win the league, United have it sewn up already and it's only January.
No issue with City coming to defend.
But the time taken over the goal kicks and players going down and staying down to break up the game really does piss me off. Thats not really part of coming to defend.
4 minutes added time, the fuck?
And the referencing of 2005 FA Cup Final as an example of Arsenal coming to defend? Poor choice. We'd have given up less chances in that game had we gone all out on attack.
But the time taken over the goal kicks and players going down and staying down to break up the game really does piss me off. Thats not really part of coming to defend.
4 minutes added time, the fuck?
And the referencing of 2005 FA Cup Final as an example of Arsenal coming to defend? Poor choice. We'd have given up less chances in that game had we gone all out on attack.
You're happy City won't win the Premiership which means United probably we will because tonight probably had the same effect on us as City in terms of winning the League.Irish Gooner wrote:What are blabbering about now Martin, were did I mention Ferguson?USMartin wrote:You'd rather watch the c**t Ferguson who would shoot his own mother in the back for a win and feel proud of it celebrate another trophy? Really?Irish Gooner wrote:Well at least the Wenger apologists have their excuses to use again tonight about "anti football".
Look at a tape of us under Graham. I applaud City's defensive display, top class. They came for a draw and got it, fair play to them.
Wenger had 90 minutes to react, again failed in fact taking off our best attacker in Walcott for the back heeling circus act Arshavin.
The only consolation is we now know for sure this bunch of clowns won't win the league, United have it sewn up already and it's only January.
Anyway fair play at least a post without the board mentioned.
Though we clearly have the better chance as we have played only one more match than United, so if they slip up it seems we are best poised to truly take advantage.
Youre joking arent you?.He wouldnt have done better than that tosser Bender who cant head a ball or control a ball.1989 wrote:I don't see what Chamakh would've added to our game. He can't finish either, and we can't cross. He would've been useless.rodders999 wrote:What had Chamackh done to Wenger?
Is there anyone left who thinks Wenger did the right thing by playing a Carling cup team at Wigan?
