Mods

Post by **REB** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:09 am

i think the mods on here are just great

Post by **DB10GOONER** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:10 am

REBEL GOONER wrote:i think the mods on here are just great

Thanks. You're a bit shit though.

Post by **REB** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:19 am

im the nice mod,
i respect people
and only lock as a last resort.
unlike some trigger happy irish cunting mods who shall remain nameless

marcengels · Post by **marcengels** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:24 am

REBEL GOONER wrote:im the nice mod,
i respect people
and only lock as a last resort.
unlike some trigger happy irish cunting mods who shall remain nameless

Yeah, right!

That thread the other day wasn't even at the resort, let alone the last one.

Post by **REB** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:27 am

i was pm,d to lock it before it got out of hand.

otherwise i would have let it go till it got to insult mode

marcengels · Post by **marcengels** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:28 am

REBEL GOONER wrote:i was pm,d to lock it before it got out of hand.

otherwise i would have let it go till it got to insult mode

Ahh, by someone higher than you.

mmm, rules out DB10 then.

Post by **REB** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 8:35 am

marcengels wrote:
REBEL GOONER wrote:i was pm,d to lock it before it got out of hand.

otherwise i would have let it go till it got to insult mode
Ahh, by someone higher than you.

mmm, rules out DB10 then.

USMartin · Post by **USMartin** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:42 am

TeeCee wrote:Martin,

Because of the boards financial policies, do you think they gave Wenger an ultimatum.....to give Denilson, Diaby, Bendtner, Eboue etc etc extended and improved contracts? I'm interested to hear how the board would have gone about this.

Can you tell me how you think the board pick the first 11, how they determine tactics (sic) and how they send the word to Wenger to make the usual 70th minute substitution?

Can you tell me when you think the board speak to Wenger to tell him to go on TV and make crass and embarrassing comments about why we lost a game?

Can you tell me how the board have managed to influence the manager of the team into having a plan A and no backup whatsoever should that plan fail?

You always lay the blame at the door of the board and not the manager so I expect to see you answer the above with the relevant proof of how the board have done this?

TeeCee, you as usual are full of crap, and trying to mix issues up tyo confuse them to protct your afith in the Board.

The individaul habits of how the team is managed match-to-match on the pitch of the pitch and and how it is run off it are too distinctly different matters. I don't suppose the Board has any say in how Mr. Wenger actually manages matches.

Of course he didn't from 1998-2005 when though many of the same flaws you refer to now were practiced the very same way then (the same 70th minute substituitions, the same lack of a Plan B, the same lack of sharp set-piece play, though more onn the attacking end then) the sole difference being the personnel being managed that way, and I doubt that unless only perfection satisified at any time, that winning the Premiership three times the FA Cup four times, and the Double twice, as well as going Unbeaten through the Premiership in 2004 and finishing in the top two every year you were too fussed about it.

So that really is a false argument there. All amangers have strengths and weaknesses and how they manage in spite of them comes down to the talent they have at their disposal.

And that is where the one relevant point you make comes in. Do you realistically believe for one moment that if the Board was making more moey available to invest in players and not tightening the wage structure at the top end that the players you list would still be here or those who were would be on the contracts they are now? Yes or no. And provide proof that the Board has offered more money .Not that they say they have - objective proof that they have. You have none and every time I have asked you to prove you have run away from this because you can't just admit that proof does not exist, and that there is not even some circumstantial proof to support your claim.

Your claim is solely based on blind faith in the Board and taking it at its word even if they offer noting else to support that clain year afy=ter year after year. You would rather believe them even if that harms the team than not.

treygoony · Post by **treygoony** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 12:19 pm

USMartin wrote:
TeeCee wrote:Martin,

Because of the boards financial policies, do you think they gave Wenger an ultimatum.....to give Denilson, Diaby, Bendtner, Eboue etc etc extended and improved contracts? I'm interested to hear how the board would have gone about this.

Can you tell me how you think the board pick the first 11, how they determine tactics (sic) and how they send the word to Wenger to make the usual 70th minute substitution?

Can you tell me when you think the board speak to Wenger to tell him to go on TV and make crass and embarrassing comments about why we lost a game?

Can you tell me how the board have managed to influence the manager of the team into having a plan A and no backup whatsoever should that plan fail?

You always lay the blame at the door of the board and not the manager so I expect to see you answer the above with the relevant proof of how the board have done this?
TeeCee, you as usual are full of crap, and trying to mix issues up tyo confuse them to protct your afith in the Board.

The individaul habits of how the team is managed match-to-match on the pitch of the pitch and and how it is run off it are too distinctly different matters. I don't suppose the Board has any say in how Mr. Wenger actually manages matches.

Of course he didn't from 1998-2005 when though many of the same flaws you refer to now were practiced the very same way then (the same 70th minute substituitions, the same lack of a Plan B, the same lack of sharp set-piece play, though more onn the attacking end then) the sole difference being the personnel being managed that way, and I doubt that unless only perfection satisified at any time, that winning the Premiership three times the FA Cup four times, and the Double twice, as well as going Unbeaten through the Premiership in 2004 and finishing in the top two every year you were too fussed about it.

So that really is a false argument there. All amangers have strengths and weaknesses and how they manage in spite of them comes down to the talent they have at their disposal.

And that is where the one relevant point you make comes in. Do you realistically believe for one moment that if the Board was making more moey available to invest in players and not tightening the wage structure at the top end that the players you list would still be here or those who were would be on the contracts they are now? Yes or no. And provide proof that the Board has offered more money .Not that they say they have - objective proof that they have. You have none and every time I have asked you to prove you have run away from this because you can't just admit that proof does not exist, and that there is not even some circumstantial proof to support your claim.

Your claim is solely based on blind faith in the Board and taking it at its word even if they offer noting else to support that clain year afy=ter year after year. You would rather believe them even if that harms the team than not.

...Erm mods? When are we going to get that yawn smiley?

Post by **I Hate Hleb** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:36 pm

marcengels wrote:
REBEL GOONER wrote:i was pm,d to lock it before it got out of hand.

otherwise i would have let it go till it got to insult mode
Ahh, by someone higher than you.

mmm, rules out DB10 then.

Think I might qualify on both definitions of the word!!!

Post by **DB10GOONER** » Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:05 pm

I Hate Hleb wrote:
marcengels wrote:
REBEL GOONER wrote:i was pm,d to lock it before it got out of hand.

otherwise i would have let it go till it got to insult mode
Ahh, by someone higher than you.

mmm, rules out DB10 then.

Think I might qualify on both definitions of the word!!!

Don't forget "wider" too, lardass!