OnlyGotOneSong wrote:Oh dont worry, Marc. He's looking for IHH.rockaldo84 wrote:on the weed mate and that effect the concentration levels


Its Up 4 Grabs Now wrote:Your Mrs had an affair with Corkbarry?marcengels wrote:No, she isnt, she just signed a new five-year contract, and made it clear that she is happy here, and that meeting that guy for an ice cream was a misunderstanding.Number 5 wrote:
Answer the question please.
Is your wife having an affair?
If not would she like to?
You've got PM.
![]()
Well played Rebel's dad!
What exactly is my opinion abiout the Board? Seriously?Number 5 wrote:Brother, USMartin ain't never gonna change his opinion about the board.rockaldo84 wrote:All yous sceptics would be sick if afc pulled it off this season and i would find it great just to see how quickly your opinion changes.
And calling our cousins from across the Atlantic names ain't gonna help Anglo-American Online Gooner relations neither.
USMartin wrote:What exactly is my opinion abiout the Board? Seriously?Number 5 wrote:Brother, USMartin ain't never gonna change his opinion about the board.rockaldo84 wrote:All yous sceptics would be sick if afc pulled it off this season and i would find it great just to see how quickly your opinion changes.
And calling our cousins from across the Atlantic names ain't gonna help Anglo-American Online Gooner relations neither.
I have said I would rather the club continue being run by this Bioard than any other.
I have said I believe this Board is entitled to return on their investment and reward for their work.
I have said I would like to see the Board take a dividend for their holdings.
All I have tried to do is raise the possibility that the Board may be setting financial policies that undermine the manager's ability to buld the best possible team.
All I have tried to do is raise the possibility that the Board's motivations in their policies may be driven by self-interest as opposed to the club's best interests.
All I have tried to do is raise the possibility that if we ignore that possibility we would be making a mistake and that the policies we want changed may not change with a new manager.
The whole point in my mind of arsenalfc,notplc is to try top cut through the confusion and uncertainty about the lack of investment in the football team, and get to the bottom of why we are not investing in the team so we supporters can advocate the needed changes in that policy.. This movement is not pro- or anti-Wenger, and it is not pro-or anti-Board. In fact arsenalfc,notplc is pro-Arsenal.
As is my attitude. I want whoever is responsible for these policies to correct them or be held accountable and frankly I do not care who that is. I simply believe there is a stronger, maybe even a stronger case for saying that in fact is the Board. I would be happy to change my mind at a moment's notice if that were justified.
USMartin wrote:What exactly is my opinion abiout the Board? Seriously?Number 5 wrote:Brother, USMartin ain't never gonna change his opinion about the board.rockaldo84 wrote:All yous sceptics would be sick if afc pulled it off this season and i would find it great just to see how quickly your opinion changes.
And calling our cousins from across the Atlantic names ain't gonna help Anglo-American Online Gooner relations neither.
I have said I would rather the club continue being run by this Bioard than any other.
I have said I believe this Board is entitled to return on their investment and reward for their work.
I have said I would like to see the Board take a dividend for their holdings.
All I have tried to do is raise the possibility that the Board may be setting financial policies that undermine the manager's ability to buld the best possible team.
All I have tried to do is raise the possibility that the Board's motivations in their policies may be driven by self-interest as opposed to the club's best interests.
All I have tried to do is raise the possibility that if we ignore that possibility we would be making a mistake and that the policies we want changed may not change with a new manager.
The whole point in my mind of arsenalfc,notplc is to try top cut through the confusion and uncertainty about the lack of investment in the football team, and get to the bottom of why we are not investing in the team so we supporters can advocate the needed changes in that policy.. This movement is not pro- or anti-Wenger, and it is not pro-or anti-Board. In fact arsenalfc,notplc is pro-Arsenal.
As is my attitude. I want whoever is responsible for these policies to correct them or be held accountable and frankly I do not care who that is. I simply believe there is a stronger, maybe even a stronger case for saying that in fact is the Board. I would be happy to change my mind at a moment's notice if that were justified.
Respectfully Martin your hunch about the board is wrong!USMartin wrote:What exactly is my opinion abiout the Board? Seriously?Number 5 wrote:Brother, USMartin ain't never gonna change his opinion about the board.rockaldo84 wrote:All yous sceptics would be sick if afc pulled it off this season and i would find it great just to see how quickly your opinion changes.
And calling our cousins from across the Atlantic names ain't gonna help Anglo-American Online Gooner relations neither.
I have said I would rather the club continue being run by this Bioard than any other.
I have said I believe this Board is entitled to return on their investment and reward for their work.
I have said I would like to see the Board take a dividend for their holdings.
All I have tried to do is raise the possibility that the Board may be setting financial policies that undermine the manager's ability to buld the best possible team.
All I have tried to do is raise the possibility that the Board's motivations in their policies may be driven by self-interest as opposed to the club's best interests.
All I have tried to do is raise the possibility that if we ignore that possibility we would be making a mistake and that the policies we want changed may not change with a new manager.
The whole point in my mind of arsenalfc,notplc is to try top cut through the confusion and uncertainty about the lack of investment in the football team, and get to the bottom of why we are not investing in the team so we supporters can advocate the needed changes in that policy.. This movement is not pro- or anti-Wenger, and it is not pro-or anti-Board. In fact arsenalfc,notplc is pro-Arsenal.
As is my attitude. I want whoever is responsible for these policies to correct them or be held accountable and frankly I do not care who that is. I simply believe there is a stronger, maybe even a stronger case for saying that in fact is the Board. I would be happy to change my mind at a moment's notice if that were justified.
Theres AT LEAST £35m to spend and im sure there could be more if players were sold and Im sure the club could access even more on top of that.rockaldo84 wrote:USMartin wrote:What exactly is my opinion abiout the Board? Seriously?Number 5 wrote:Brother, USMartin ain't never gonna change his opinion about the board.rockaldo84 wrote:All yous sceptics would be sick if afc pulled it off this season and i would find it great just to see how quickly your opinion changes.
And calling our cousins from across the Atlantic names ain't gonna help Anglo-American Online Gooner relations neither.
I have said I would rather the club continue being run by this Bioard than any other.
I have said I believe this Board is entitled to return on their investment and reward for their work.
I have said I would like to see the Board take a dividend for their holdings.
All I have tried to do is raise the possibility that the Board may be setting financial policies that undermine the manager's ability to buld the best possible team.
All I have tried to do is raise the possibility that the Board's motivations in their policies may be driven by self-interest as opposed to the club's best interests.
All I have tried to do is raise the possibility that if we ignore that possibility we would be making a mistake and that the policies we want changed may not change with a new manager.
The whole point in my mind of arsenalfc,notplc is to try top cut through the confusion and uncertainty about the lack of investment in the football team, and get to the bottom of why we are not investing in the team so we supporters can advocate the needed changes in that policy.. This movement is not pro- or anti-Wenger, and it is not pro-or anti-Board. In fact arsenalfc,notplc is pro-Arsenal.
As is my attitude. I want whoever is responsible for these policies to correct them or be held accountable and frankly I do not care who that is. I simply believe there is a stronger, maybe even a stronger case for saying that in fact is the Board. I would be happy to change my mind at a moment's notice if that were justified.
wasnt pointing finger at yourself if you look around the threads on the forum you see alot of this wenger out shit and im just given the guy a bit of support and all that stuff youv just given me ,im glad you feel o passionates but its nothing to do with the PRO WENGER thread but fair play mate.To b honest getting fuked off with the board and would love to hear public speech from them about plans and even just seethe financial report,because there mustnt be any cash for transfers
NO worries - Number 5 brought me into this. It was his comment I was replying to.rockaldo84 wrote: I wasnt pointing finger at yourself if you look around the threads on the forum you see alot of this wenger out shit and im just given the guy a bit of support and all that stuff youv just given me ,im glad you feel o passionates but its nothing to do with the PRO WENGER thread but fair play mate.To b honest getting fuked off with the board and would love to hear public speech from them about plans and even just seethe financial report,because there mustnt be any cash for transfers