Why god why!!!??? They were so fucking perfect together


Even for real fun I Don't Wanna go to Chelsea......SWLGooner wrote:Only if he brings the tampons for the flightUSMartin wrote:SWLGooner wrote: kingjayson1 wrote:
SWL was so far up my creek as OBG says that it was tickling my nostril hairs.
As Richard Keys would say I was hanging out both ends of it
Never thought a home-made Human Centipede would be so much fun.
And USM if you do want to get out tgen believe me when I say Jayson's got room for a third
You should have him fly over with you in the fall then you naughty boy you
Fuck the Blind Pig we can head a bit further south in Manhattan and have some real fun
Its coz that dog (bouncer??) shagged her when he was out at work...then the sheep got involved and after that it all went to bollox......tut tut...it was never like that when Kylie was there.....BournemouthRED wrote:Why cant we all just get along? I hate all this fighting, reminds me when karl and Susan broke up in neighbors!
Why god why!!!??? They were so fucking perfect together![]()
I am quite impressed by this effort as I have an idea of the effort involved Well doneOneBardGooner wrote:QuartzGooner wrote:The USMartin thread on wages was in my opinion one where a board discussion was needed.
USMartin, unfortunately your past behaviour has given you a reputation here as someone obsessed with the bard.![]()
![]()
![]()
Oh! No! Don't bring me into this......
![]()
![]()
This is positively unfair, who are you - the thought police? I take no side here but it seems to me that both the board and Wenger out obsessions are utterly equal in scope. Who are you to say what's more "central to the fans"? You don't speak for me, for starters. USMartin is a dullard, but he talks sense if you can make it out in all his overly-long posts. He should be entitled to express himself here with the same rules as the rest of us.Henry Norris 1913 wrote:no I can't , because at the end of the day the issue with the performance of our manager is more central to the fans, whereas you repeatedly hijack threads to say the SAME shit that winds people up because you drag the board into everything.USMartin wrote:No there are things I take seriously and there I things I don't - no different than anyone else here. Simple question since this is the heart of the issue can you name one instance when a forum member who repeatedly uses every thread the can to call for sacking the manager(and I can name several people who do this) has gotten the same heat ihave for thread hijacking. And if anything its easier to read the shorter angrier more obscenity-ridden posts of that nature.Henry Norris 1913 wrote:theres one reason why you don't get along well here USM and thats-
YOU TAKE THIS PLACE TOO SERIOUSLY.
get a blog, and post your shit there. I swear on behalf of flash that he will read every word.
So care to answer that?
First of all, Marty, why is this a separate thread?USMartin wrote:Flash it's not hypocritical at all. There is a difference between sincerely posting views they are believed to be relevant to the discussion in a thread whetherattacks insults ad hominem complaints and jpegs that are not relevant in any way shape or form to the actual discussion.
Expressing a contrary or alternative opinion in a genuine discussion is not thread hi-jacking. Interfering with the exchange of genuine discussion is,and that is what you and others engage in constantly, and no one can say I do that.
You can debate whether my view is relevant to a thread but the fact is an argument can be made for that being the case. What is the relevance of posting a jpeg of a movie poster? What is the relevance of that? What is the relevance of stating a discussion you don't have to read or a thread you don;'t have to open is boring or irrelevant or anything?
I could care less what you have to post about me. I just think its disingenuous attempts at amateur censorship by making threads unreadable for those who might want to and really inconsiderate of the forum as a whole and wish you'd stop it and stop hiding behind this false equivalnecy in which what ever you define as hi-jacking is whether that is true or not and justiifies genuine hi-jacking on your part and others as well and wish the mods would in fact have a talk about this, as even though I never did anything to justify having to I did try to meet you people part way on this - but guess what - the same people complaining about theread hi-jacking complained about that too.
Have the courage of your convictions and admit what this is about you McDowell and the lot or else else give it up or I will formally ask someone to deal with it.
Sorry, I meant the other Bard.OneBardGooner wrote:QuartzGooner wrote:The USMartin thread on wages was in my opinion one where a board discussion was needed.
USMartin, unfortunately your past behaviour has given you a reputation here as someone obsessed with the bard.![]()
![]()
![]()
Oh! No! Don't bring me into this......
![]()
![]()
ummmm.......thanks????????antgel wrote:This is positively unfair, who are you - the thought police? I take no side here but it seems to me that both the board and Wenger out obsessions are utterly equal in scope. Who are you to say what's more "central to the fans"? You don't speak for me, for starters. USMartin is a dullard, but he talks sense if you can make it out in all his overly-long posts. He should be entitled to express himself here with the same rules as the rest of us.Henry Norris 1913 wrote:no I can't , because at the end of the day the issue with the performance of our manager is more central to the fans, whereas you repeatedly hijack threads to say the SAME shit that winds people up because you drag the board into everything.USMartin wrote:No there are things I take seriously and there I things I don't - no different than anyone else here. Simple question since this is the heart of the issue can you name one instance when a forum member who repeatedly uses every thread the can to call for sacking the manager(and I can name several people who do this) has gotten the same heat ihave for thread hijacking. And if anything its easier to read the shorter angrier more obscenity-ridden posts of that nature.Henry Norris 1913 wrote:theres one reason why you don't get along well here USM and thats-
YOU TAKE THIS PLACE TOO SERIOUSLY.
get a blog, and post your shit there. I swear on behalf of flash that he will read every word.
So care to answer that?
Anyone else turned on?g88ner wrote:Martin, if you have a problem with other forum members, pm them privately and sort it out like adults... or, if you feel that upset about it, privately pm the mods... and if you really feel action is needed, then privately pm Rob, Mike Francis and/or Gooner.ed; if they feel you have a case, they will help, I'm sure.
This just isn't thread worthy... and certainly not in Arsenal chat!
This forum is turning into a nasty place of abuse and tit-fot-tat bullshit. A quick look back at your recent activity on here Martin will clearly show that you're throwing around insults like confetti just like others. It's cringeworthy, and perhaps it's best to pm each other privately and sort it out like grown ups instead of having open war on Arsenal threads!!!!
No ones cares who started it... just finish it once and for all and move the fuck on. These daily feuds are boring! AND THAT'S EVERYONE, NOT JUST MARTIN.
Because as the title reads I am not going to let my threads be hi-jacked anymore and that means I am not going to aid you self-styled forum censors who don't have the courage to simply admit what you want - which is what "the good people" on any forum do - they are honest about what they want and why.olgitgooner wrote: First of all, Marty, why is this a separate thread?![]()
Are you suggestiung that based on seniority forum members have rights to mis-treat others like some sort of fraternity where pledges have to go through initiation? Or that long-standing members are somehow simply superior human beings and their behavior should never be questioned or criticized no matter their conduct of themselves or towards others on here? Hmmmm....maybe I have actually learned a little something about youolgitgooner wrote: Secondly, why are you threatening respected and long-standing forum members with some sort of sanction (banning, maybe?) just because your feelings are hurt?
It just doesn't make sense.
Trust me if you thought that was true you would have done so by now - indeed I would expect you to once again mis-represent the facts as you once did on here about me then too. I don't trust you ina any way for one moment to to be one bit better as a man as you have shown yourself to be ion this forum in my experience.olgitgooner wrote: Thirdly, if the good folk on here "formally asked" for you to be "dealt with".....you probably wouldn't be posting here at all.
Even if there were a hint of actual truth in that statement I could not hope to do it nearly as well and eagerly as you . In this case and other cases like this relating to dishonesty and hypocrisy, you olgit are a better man than I. I just can't compete at this.olgitgooner wrote:You really do take the piss out of the freedom that you get here.