Dear realists (NSFW)

mrgnu1958 · Post by **mrgnu1958** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:35 pm

flash gunner wrote:
mrgnu1958 wrote:Ive just got home from work..Have i missed anything today AND has anyone Died?

I heard Norman wisdom is feeling a bit peaky

Didnt you know he died months ago?

I really liked him ya know

Henry Norris 1913 · Post by **Henry Norris 1913** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:37 pm

martin you did call mcdowell a *word censored* though

or was it a "*word censored* pussy"

USMartin · Post by **USMartin** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:37 pm

Flash you have every right to post in any thread you want and any view you want - so long as it is factually or contextually relevant to what is being discussed in the forum or can be genuinely argued to be so.. You reading of this as a matter of personal freedom equates to yelling fire in a crowded theatre.

You are engaged in deliberately disrupting the right and ability of others to share and exchnge views they choose to in these instances. You are not expressing relevant discussion points of any sort - whatever the opinion relevant discussiion points are I think I can say welcome at all times. Any opinon that can be said to be genuinely relevant by the person posting it to a subject discussed woulkd be welcome.

The problem is and more so with McDowell than with you there is no effort to express any sort of opinion but to protest to expression and exchange of opinion and to interfere in that process. Not just in my threads but in other threads relevant to my views, whether I am posing in them or not, whther I am posting that day or not, regardless of what I have posted in fact. I don't believe you can honestly defend that as simply your freedon of jaunty give-and-take banter we all enjoy.

But I will give you the chance

how is the following in any way relevant to the thread it was posted in and the issue being discussed

mcdowell42 wrote:

or this

mcdowell42 wrote:

The simple truth is - you are free to discuss what you want how you want and free not to as well. You are not free to deny that freedon to others and that is what you and particularly McDowell are trying to do.

Post by **flash gunner** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:38 pm

Im losing the will to live

1989 · Post by **1989** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:44 pm

USMartin wrote: I did not call you all sorts of c**ts. I called you a c**t and then I called you a bigger c**t then you already (were). That is by my count two sorts of c**ts which is a ways from all sorts of c**ts...

TeeCee · Post by **TeeCee** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:44 pm

mcdowell42 · Post by **mcdowell42** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:45 pm

Hi marty you seem a bit upset.

Deise Gooner · Post by **Deise Gooner** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:49 pm

USMartin wrote: I did not call you all sorts of c**ts. I called you a c**t and then I called you a bigger c**t then you already (were). That is by my count two sorts of c**ts which is a ways from all sorts of c**ts...

This is my new sig

mcdowell42 · Post by **mcdowell42** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:52 pm

Henry Norris 1913 · Post by **Henry Norris 1913** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:53 pm

USM must be a double account or a WUM. come on, own up

mcdowell42 · Post by **mcdowell42** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:55 pm

Deise Gooner wrote:
USMartin wrote: I did not call you all sorts of c**ts. I called you a c**t and then I called you a bigger c**t then you already (were). That is by my count two sorts of c**ts which is a ways from all sorts of c**ts...

This is my new sig

Thanks deise for telling me how to post jpegs on here.They are coming in very handy.

1886 · Post by **1886** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:56 pm

Deise Gooner wrote:
USMartin wrote: I did not call you all sorts of c**ts. I called you a c**t and then I called you a bigger c**t then you already (were). That is by my count two sorts of c**ts which is a ways from all sorts of c**ts...

This is my new sig

antgel · Post by **antgel** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 8:57 pm

Handy for making everyone's eyes bleed and using "humour" from elsewhere in an attempt to be funny?

1886 · Post by **1886** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:00 pm

antgel wrote:Handy for making everyone's eyes bleed and using "humour" from elsewhere in an attempt to be funny?

Nah, just a bit of fun mate. Although I will admit some of them are terrible

Post by **g88ner** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:02 pm

Another day, another feud involving Martin. It's so predictable.

This forum has lost the plot. It's all about abuse and tit-for-tat bullshit. Insult after insult just to fill time. What's the point?

I hardly post on this forum anymore because of abusive posters like Martin. He's already given me the "fuck off", "fuck you", "jackass" treatment, and Flash is 2 types of *word censored*

and someone else is a *word censored* pussy, apparently

... it's crazy, and will never end.

It's just become a depressing environment.

****"y was rightly given a short term ban to calm him down, and I'm amazed Martin hasn't had his wings clipped as well. When is enough enough? - or do we have to read these endless abusive posts forever more?

Martin can quite rightly claim he's not the only abusive poster, and will no doubt say he's only retaliating, but as Wenger said this week -

"I am not responsible for public order," said Wenger, "but I believe individual responsibility is down to everybody"

In other words Martin, stop blaming others and take responsiblilty for your behaviour and tone down the abuse! only then can you complain about others.

Regards,

*word censored* fuck prick *word censored* wanker pussy (or whatever else you'll no doubt refer to me as

)