Dear realists (NSFW)

mrgnu1958 · Post by **mrgnu1958** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:20 pm

g88ner wrote:Another day, another feud involving Martin. It's so predictable.

This forum has lost the plot. It's all about abuse and tit-for-tat bullshit. Insult after insult just to fill time. What's the point?

I hardly post on this forum anymore because of abusive posters like Martin. He's already given me the "fuck off", "fuck you", "jackass" treatment, and Flash is 2 types of c**t and someone else is a c**t pussy, apparently ... it's crazy, and will never end.

It's just become a depressing environment.

****"y was rightly given a short term ban to calm him down, and I'm amazed Martin hasn't had his wings clipped as well. When is enough enough? - or do we have to read these endless abusive posts forever more?

Martin can quite rightly claim he's not the only abusive poster, and will no doubt say he's only retaliating, but as Wenger said this week -

"I am not responsible for public order," said Wenger, "but I believe individual responsibility is down to everybody"

In other words Martin, stop blaming others and take responsiblilty for your behaviour and tone down the abuse! only then can you complain about others.

Regards,

c**ts fuck prick c**t wanker pussy (or whatever else you'll no doubt refer to me as )

you crunt

Post by **g88ner** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:26 pm

USMartin wrote:It's a shame you are incapable of addressing anyone else's conduct g88ner with a degree of honesty or objectivity. You might actually make some difference in this if you did. I would certainly be willing to listen to some of your reason if it ever directed at anyone besides me. And be an adult and amdit it never is. You have never singled out any other person by name when addressing these issues - certainly not when addresssing me.

Why should anyone take you seriously let alone me when you are so blantantly biased in your supposedly sincere efforts?

I'm not being dragged into a feud with you Martin. If you don't think I have a point, then that's up to you and others to decide.

If you don't think you're an abusive poster then fine, but the evidence (i.e. your posting history) suggests that you most certainly are.

I'd say it's not acceptable behaviour, but if you think it is then I guess we've been brought up on very different values, mate.

If you want to ignore your behaviour and discuss my bias instead, then that's up to you - it's just something else for you to complain about BUT you should be more concerned with your output... and whether it's acceptable... and if not, you should take responsibility for your behaviour and leave the other abusive posters to it. They'll soon get bored if you ignore them mate.

You're clearly an intelligent chap, and it's just beyond me why you keep getting caught up in these daily feuds. Just stop... it's not difficult.

Deise Gooner · Post by **Deise Gooner** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:29 pm

mcdowell42 wrote:
Deise Gooner wrote:
USMartin wrote: I did not call you all sorts of c**ts. I called you a c**t and then I called you a bigger c**t then you already (were). That is by my count two sorts of c**ts which is a ways from all sorts of c**ts...

This is my new sig
Thanks deise for telling me how to post jpegs on here.They are coming in very handy.

Wish i hadnt now

fucking BIFFO

Rugby Gooner · Post by **Rugby Gooner** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:29 pm

Peeman · Post by **Peeman** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:29 pm

I like it when he's not talking about the bored

1886 · Post by **1886** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:33 pm

AA23Northbank wrote:
1989 wrote:
Deise Gooner wrote:

AA23NorthBank wrote:

1989 · Post by **1989** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:34 pm

Deise Gooner · Post by **Deise Gooner** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:37 pm

1886 wrote:
AA23Northbank wrote:
1989 wrote:
Deise Gooner wrote:

AA23NorthBank wrote:

Im out, reload!

1886 · Post by **1886** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:37 pm

USMartin · Post by **USMartin** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:04 pm

g88ner wrote:
USMartin wrote:It's a shame you are incapable of addressing anyone else's conduct g88ner with a degree of honesty or objectivity. You might actually make some difference in this if you did. I would certainly be willing to listen to some of your reason if it ever directed at anyone besides me. And be an adult and amdit it never is. You have never singled out any other person by name when addressing these issues - certainly not when addresssing me.

Why should anyone take you seriously let alone me when you are so blantantly biased in your supposedly sincere efforts?
I'm not being dragged into a feud with you Martin. If you don't think I have a point, then that's up to you and others to decide.

If you don't think you're an abusive poster then fine, but the evidence (i.e. your posting history) suggests that you most certainly are.

I'd say it's not acceptable behaviour, but if you think it is then I guess we've been brought up on very different values, mate.

If you want to ignore your behaviour and discuss my bias instead, then that's up to you - it's just something else for you to complain about BUT you should be more concerned with your output... and whether it's acceptable... and if not, you should take responsibility for your behaviour and leave the other abusive posters to it. They'll soon get bored if you ignore them mate.

You're clearly an intelligent chap, and it's just beyond me why you keep getting caught up in these daily feuds. Just stop... it's not difficult.

Show me where I have not taken responsbility for my own behavior then. Lord knows you will have plenty of opportunities and surely must have an example to prove that contention.

I have in fact said I have not engaged in thread hi-jacking because I have not. I do not deny anything I have posted anywhere - it simply is only thread hi-jacking in the eyes of some and while they can make an honest and even reasonable case for that, I can make a case that is every bit as honest and reasonable that it is not thread hi-jacking but simply called that in many cases by those taking exception to those views and seek to validate their views and discredit mine.

As MM99 said earlier

MM99 wrote: It's ... the double standards that are deployed depending on your views on this forum.

In other words legitimate posts become thread hi-jacking solely based on whether you support the view expressed in them not whether in fact they are actually irrelevant or disruptive to the thread discussion.

Other than that I have no problem discussing my behavior. I give as well as I get now sometimes more sometimes not. I can be as harsh abrasive and even abusive as many here at times, sometimes at my own initiation, more often not. And I take - not for the first time either - full responsibiltiy for how I conduct myself at all times. If you feel I am not seeing something fine, but if you want me to look you should show the same willingess to pint that out to others at the same time or why should I take you seriously?

No worries, no feud, just an honest and adult difference of opinion.

I will say the worst I can say is you remind of a parent who goes out to break up his kid fighting but if his kid is winning will wait till the other kid has the upper hand before breaking them up. You are a smart person too, so you must know you are not being objective or consistent and that can only undermine any genuine efforts you may be making to reason in this or any other intsnace.

frankbutcher · Post by **frankbutcher** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:14 pm

To add my two-penneth....

This forum is a joke (in a good way), so don't take it seriously. There is a definite 'clique' in the sense that some people spend more time than others on here, and consequently have an affinity with each other (in-jokes etc.) When someone tries to change the status quo, they are shot down in flames. Serious debate is disrupted until the poster is forced to give up.

How is this any different from real life? The majority rule the minority.

I say like it, or lump it!!

mcdowell42 · Post by **mcdowell42** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:17 pm

Post by **g88ner** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:24 pm

Martin, you're going way off track and I have no intention of following you.

I don't think your abusive behaviour is acceptable, you do - so we're at an impasse and there's nothing to add.

I've made my point. Take it on board or ignore it.

mcdowell42 · Post by **mcdowell42** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:27 pm

g88ner wrote:Martin, you're going way off track and I have no intention of following you.

I've made my point. Take it on board or ignore it.

tel · Post by **tel** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:28 pm

When will the mods ban this self indulging prick?

Until they do most threads are hijacked by it.

PFO