As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
I'm sorry, I like Nasri as much as anyone when he's showing his flair, but the guy is really not that good of a player since he only shows up like 25% of the time. Arshavin may only show up 25% of the time too but I feel that when he does show up, he's more productive than Nasri. If we could sell Nasri now for 20m i'd do it in a heartbeat. We do not need him anyways, we have plenty of cover for his positions. Losing Nasri wouldnt really effect the team AT ALL in my opinion. Losing Fabregas, however, will sink the ship.
Mata would for sure be a good signing and i hope it gets done.
He might be a good signing, he might not. But one thing I am certain of is that Mata is not anywhere close to being as good as Cesc and, contrary to some people's belief, won't by himself be sufficient replacement for what we'll be missing if Fabregas goes.
I Hate Hleb wrote:He might be a good signing, he might not. But one thing I am certain of is that Mata is not anywhere close to being as good as Cesc and, contrary to some people's belief, won't by himself be sufficient replacement for what we'll be missing if Fabregas goes.
Agree with that. I think he would be a good addition, not world class and certainly don't see him fulfilling the playmaker role Cesc did so well. When Cesc goes, we will have to adjust the way we play to a degree I suppose.
The more i look and think about it, how the fuck did Wenger ever manage to sign Squillaci.
This is an even worse signing than a Diaby or a Denilson. Those players were starting out and he was hoping to bring them on.
Squillaci was an experienced CH. What did he see to make him buy?
That is proof that Wenger doesn't have a clue when talking about defence and about how to stop the rot.
its what i've been saying for ages ,you dont win anything with namby pamby rolling over ooohhh i'm hurt jessies.we need some backbone some one who is going to get sent off 3 -4 times a year for gbh.then we wont get the piss taken out of us.oh go on i can hear you all now ,"what use is a player getting sent off?".well ask pv no one took the piss then did they.lets get back to winning ,to hell with all this football.play the long ball,kick and run ,bully,boss,anything just fucking win.one last rant i notice all you purists have gone silent on the point of barton,having seconed thoughts are we,tippy tappy football not quiet satisfying enough?
MEDINABOY wrote:its what i've been saying for ages ,you dont win anything with namby pamby rolling over ooohhh i'm hurt jessies.we need some backbone some one who is going to get sent off 3 -4 times a year for gbh.then we wont get the piss taken out of us.oh go on i can hear you all now ,"what use is a player getting sent off?".well ask pv no one took the piss then did they.lets get back to winning ,to hell with all this football.play the long ball,kick and run ,bully,boss,anything just fucking win.one last rant i notice all you purists have gone silent on the point of barton,having seconed thoughts are we,tippy tappy football not quiet satisfying enough?