Apparently we bid 6mil for Cahill

As we're unlikely to see terraces again at football, this is the virtual equivalent where you can chat to your hearts content about all football matters and, obviously, Arsenal in particular. This forum encourages all Gooners to visit and contribute so please keep it respectful, clean and topical.
Post Reply
rigsby
Posts: 3046
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:52 am

Post by rigsby »

But why not start with something like say, 12mil? But 6?! Seriously

User avatar
MK Gould
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:25 pm
Location: North Bucks

Post by MK Gould »

The fact that Cahill only has a year left on his contract is interesting, but surely not the most critical thing here. After all, we're buying the player, not his contract!

How much do we think he is worth to us NOW? £15m? Then that is what we should be prepared to pay as a maximum. That's what Citeh effectively did over Nasri.

Ok, you can try to call Bolton's bluff on the basis that they'll get nowt in 12 months time. But when Cahill is available for free then we won't get him anyway as someone else will offer higher wages. And we need him now - not in 12 months......

There must be a figure somewhere between £6m and £15m on which the clubs can agree......but the deal needs to be done now. Not January, and certainly not next summer!

User avatar
biglunn
Posts: 259
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Windsor, Berks

Post by biglunn »

Utterly shameful behaviour from Arsenal.

Just to put in perspective - we put in a bid of £6m which is around what we got for Clichy. A valuation less than what we would sell Bendy for :shock:

I cant understand - why on earth bid such a stupid amount? Was it to deliberately insult Bolton, the player, and Arsenal fans? If we didnt want the player, we should not bid at all!

User avatar
donaldo
Posts: 8175
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 2:33 pm
Location: The gates of hell waiting for Wenger

Post by donaldo »

MK Gould wrote:The fact that Cahill only has a year left on his contract is interesting, but surely not the most critical thing here. After all, we're buying the player, not his contract!

How much do we think he is worth to us NOW? £15m? Then that is what we should be prepared to pay as a maximum. That's what Citeh effectively did over Nasri.

Ok, you can try to call Bolton's bluff on the basis that they'll get nowt in 12 months time. But when Cahill is available for free then we won't get him anyway as someone else will offer higher wages. And we need him now - not in 12 months......

There must be a figure somewhere between £6m and £15m on which the clubs can agree......but the deal needs to be done now. Not January, and certainly not next summer!

We have £70m to spend but we are haggling over a few million like we did with Alonso and Schwarzer.Blackburn put a price of £16m on Phil Jones.Fergie didnt argue over the price he just paid it and got his man.

rigsby
Posts: 3046
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:52 am

Post by rigsby »

To make it worse the boy wants to come to Arsenal. Apparently Spurs preparing an offer.

Jumpers For Goalposts
Posts: 2245
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:42 pm

Post by Jumpers For Goalposts »

We fucked about all last summer over the Mark Schwarzer transfer - for the sake of what amounts to small change for a club like Arsenal. And then we missed out.

If Wenger is serious about wanting Cahill then offer Bolton a reasonable amount, don't take the piss out of them. He looks like a good, solid, defender that is comfortable in the EPL - just what we've been crying out for.

IF - and it's a very big IF - Wenger can bring in 2 or 3 experienced players like Cahill, this will be a big step in the right direction but FFS Arsene conduct yourself like Fergusmoan does - identify the players we need, pay the money and get them integrated into a winning squad.

Get a few big, strong defenders in and maybe we'll stop getting f**ked over and losing valuable points to teams like Stoke

1989
Posts: 11832
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:50 pm

Post by 1989 »

What a fucking laugh Wenger is. £6m for Gary Cahill? Hang your head in shame you tight french bastard

User avatar
TeeCee
Posts: 10081
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 12:26 pm
Location: On the Cusp in SW France

Post by TeeCee »

If reports are true then Arsenal have plumbed new depths. There comes a point when people look at you as a mickey mouse club and we're heading that way.

It's all about supply and demand. City wanted Clichy, we didn't particularly want to keep him so sold for a reasonable fee. We 'want' Cahill, along with quite a few other clubs potentially so Bolton are not going to sell for anything less than 12m I would think. We ought to stick in a bid of 14m now and say it's our 1st (or 2nd)! and final offer. If we piss them off by raising the offer by 500k every day they'll laugh it off till the deadline passes and we're fooked.
Now is NOT the time to worry about the odd few million, needs must and we need big time!!

rigsby
Posts: 3046
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:52 am

Post by rigsby »

If reports are true then Arsenal have plumbed new depths. There comes a point when people look at you as a mickey mouse club and we're heading that way.
It is true, Coyle confirmed it.

Btw I did say we were in talks in the Udinese thread. Smug? :D

1989
Posts: 11832
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:50 pm

Post by 1989 »

Bolton chairman called Wenger a bellend on Twitter.

User avatar
HashKads
Posts: 5267
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:44 pm
Location: Maiden name: KingJayson

Post by HashKads »

1989 wrote:Bolton chairman called Wenger a bellend on Twitter.
No he didn't.

1989
Posts: 11832
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:50 pm

Post by 1989 »

He inferred that he was a bellend.

User avatar
Percy Dalton
Posts: 6060
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:54 am
Location: Selling peanuts on the North Bank
Contact:

Post by Percy Dalton »

kingjayson1 wrote:
1989 wrote:Bolton chairman called Wenger a bellend on Twitter.
No he didn't.

He called him a fuckwit!

8)

User avatar
HashKads
Posts: 5267
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:44 pm
Location: Maiden name: KingJayson

Post by HashKads »

It was a retweet.

User avatar
Henry Norris 1913
Posts: 8374
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:25 pm

Post by Henry Norris 1913 »

please wenger you have limited time to prove you aren't a total *word censored*, get the deal done NOW! If scum snap him up I'll be fucking livid :evil:

Post Reply